{{ VRC-Stub}} | User: Sgeo | 27 December 2004 | 2 | (VR) |
{{ parasite-stub}} | User: Happyfeet10 | 12 May | 2 | Parasitism | Feeds into Category:Science stubs. Was also listed at Wikipedia:Template_messages/Stubs. |
{{ monorail-stub}} | User: 144.139.89.214 | 17 May | 1 | Monorails | Category not created. |
We need SfD. -- grm_wnr Esc 01:07, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
Grutness... wha? 01:36, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
Template:Ent-stub ( talk links )(for " entertainment-related articles") was created on 17 Jun 2005 by User:Member. There is no accompanying category for the stub. BlankVerse ∅ 06:12, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Added to WP:WSS/ST today by User:Ashmodai. Redlink associated category ( Category:Reenactment stubs). Not used on any articles. -- TheParanoidOne 15:44, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Created by User:Sarge Baldy on the 28th. Added to Category:People stubs today. Use by 52 articles. I haven't removed it from the Category:People stubs list yet, as it seems like it satisfies the relevant criteria. If so, it needs to be added to WP:WSS/ST. -- TheParanoidOne 30 June 2005 05:49 (UTC)
Newly added to the Stub type list. nly one article in it - Tax Reform, which is an econ-stub currently awaiting merging. Do we need this one as a separate category? Perhaps we do - econ-stub is pretty full - but is this the best way to split it? Thoughts? Grutness... wha? 1 July 2005 05:18 (UTC)
A Tax stub is definately useful. Go to the taxation or tax reform categories for a list of potential articles. Econ is too full, and those of us wikis working on tax articles would love to have a stub for that purpose of categorizing our work more appropriately in order to get the attention they need. Temporarily, I've discovered 19 articles using {{ tax-stub}} and those are only the ones I've managed to glean from econ stubs doing a simple title search for "tax". There are probably a lot more in econ and other stub categories to make a very viable and useful econ sub category. Inigmatus July 1, 2005 19:41 (UTC)
The {{ tax-stub}} has been created officially now and is open for final review. Inigmatus July 6, 2005 14:59 (UTC)
Created on June 24th by User:Roadrunner3000. Used by 32 articles. Conscious 3 July 2005 05:24 (UTC)
Created on July 5th, category contains 81 entries and needs some text added to it. Conscious 5 July 2005 04:55 (UTC)
User:Sarge Baldy is on a bit a bit of a roll with creating stub templates/categories and adding them to the Category:People stubs page.
I pointed out this project to him on his talk page last night, but two hours later he archived the entire page so I am not sure if he looked at it. If someone else want to point it out, feel free. -- TheParanoidOne 5 July 2005 05:51 (UTC)
Isn't this a subtopic of {{ comp-sci-stub}}? If so, that one isn't so big as to require splitting. On the other hand, there's a Wikipedia:WikiProject Computer science now, which listed it on their project page, and maybe they need it. In any case it's used on one article and the category hasn't been created. -- 84.152.153.113 21:25, 10 July 2005 (UTC) ( <= User:Grm_wnr not logged in)
Found this stub and category July 14 and inserted into WP:WSS/ST. The template was created in late June by User:Marianocecowski. Found as a sub-category under Category:South America stubs. Courtland 03:46, July 14, 2005 (UTC)
I found {{ statute-stub}} and Category:Statute stubs on 14 July 2005; I added them to WP:WSS/ST. The template was created on July 11 2005 by User:PullUpYourSocks. It is a subcategory of Category:Law stubs, and it already has ~85 articles. Based on the alphabetic distribution of the articles, many more articles will be added. — Fingers-of-Pyrex 02:28, July 15, 2005 (UTC)
Created yesterday by James Flinders ( talk · contribs). Discovered as a consequence of Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Sally Brabyn. The original template also applied Category:Halifax College stubs, but that was removed by 172.213.111.53 ( talk · contribs). Uncle G 10:31, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
I've moved the template to Cayman-stub (small s), but this one's still annoying. I saw it and thought "We don't even have a separate stub for crocodiles - what's going on", but no, this is for the Cayman Islands. Only 25 stubs, most of which are at least as well covered by Caribbean-geo-stub (since they are geo-stubs). At the very least this will need a rename. Grutness... wha? 11:41, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
I found {{ case-law-stub}} and {{ SCOTUS-case-stub}} (corresponding categories Category:Case law stubs and Category:U.S. Supreme Court stubs) on 21 July 2005; I added them to WP:WSS/ST. The templates were created on July 8 2005 and July 11 2005 by PullUpYourSocks. Category:Case law stubs is a subcategory of Category:Law stubs, and it has ~35 articles. Category:U.S. Supreme Court stubs is a subcategory of Category:Case law stubs, and it has ~35 articles. — Fingers-of-Pyrex 19:03, July 21, 2005 (UTC)
This one's a weird one. User:Naive cynic made it - as a redirect to the European geography stub category (weird enough, to start with). Then, a few days later, User:Juro activated it, creating a new Category:Slovakia geography stubs. He then proceeded to make it a subcategory of Category:Slovakia-related stubs, which he created, even though there was an already-extant Category:Slovakia stubs. It'd be really nice to know what's been going on. Oh, and at last count there were 53 Slovakian stubs, so it can be fairly well populated - it's just annoying that it'll require some work. Grutness... wha? 10:12, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
I'm not really here (I'm on wikibreak), but... All the stubs in the Euro category are in a database saying where they're from, and doing the work now and doing it when the stub is created means simply doiung the same amount of work - so nothing is saved in doing it early. In fact, if the stub is not going to be created, which is always possible, the work's been done for mothing. Using redirects also doubles the server load, since both the redirect and the "real" template have to be used. So creating an unproposed template early as a redirect actually increases the server load and potentially wastes energy that may never be needed. What's more, the database lists a lot of articles where the stub wasn't changed, and it will be a little extra work sorting which ones have and which ones haven't in restubbing, so it's created yet more work from that point of view. All in all, a considerable amount more work was created both in terms of server load and stub sorting, and it prompted someone else to create a duplicate category that may not otherwise have been made. I appreciate the thought behind what you did, but it was yet another of those good intentions that didn't really help. Grutness... wha? 06:47, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
I found this stub template by accident while sorting some of {{ bio-stub}}. It seems to have been created by an anon editor a week ago, without creating the matching category. It has three articles at present, although undoubtably more could be found. Should I create the category? -- ScottDavis 11:49, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
Created by User:Maoririder who seems to have created several out-of-process stub types recently. i have listed this one on SfD. DES (talk) 17:45, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
Created by User:Maoririder. No category. I have listed this on SfD also. DES (talk) 19:02, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
As with the previous two, created by User:Maoririder. No category. Limited scope. Listed on SfD. DES (talk) 19:29, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
{{ VRC-Stub}} | User: Sgeo | 27 December 2004 | 2 | (VR) |
{{ parasite-stub}} | User: Happyfeet10 | 12 May | 2 | Parasitism | Feeds into Category:Science stubs. Was also listed at Wikipedia:Template_messages/Stubs. |
{{ monorail-stub}} | User: 144.139.89.214 | 17 May | 1 | Monorails | Category not created. |
We need SfD. -- grm_wnr Esc 01:07, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
Grutness... wha? 01:36, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
Template:Ent-stub ( talk links )(for " entertainment-related articles") was created on 17 Jun 2005 by User:Member. There is no accompanying category for the stub. BlankVerse ∅ 06:12, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Added to WP:WSS/ST today by User:Ashmodai. Redlink associated category ( Category:Reenactment stubs). Not used on any articles. -- TheParanoidOne 15:44, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Created by User:Sarge Baldy on the 28th. Added to Category:People stubs today. Use by 52 articles. I haven't removed it from the Category:People stubs list yet, as it seems like it satisfies the relevant criteria. If so, it needs to be added to WP:WSS/ST. -- TheParanoidOne 30 June 2005 05:49 (UTC)
Newly added to the Stub type list. nly one article in it - Tax Reform, which is an econ-stub currently awaiting merging. Do we need this one as a separate category? Perhaps we do - econ-stub is pretty full - but is this the best way to split it? Thoughts? Grutness... wha? 1 July 2005 05:18 (UTC)
A Tax stub is definately useful. Go to the taxation or tax reform categories for a list of potential articles. Econ is too full, and those of us wikis working on tax articles would love to have a stub for that purpose of categorizing our work more appropriately in order to get the attention they need. Temporarily, I've discovered 19 articles using {{ tax-stub}} and those are only the ones I've managed to glean from econ stubs doing a simple title search for "tax". There are probably a lot more in econ and other stub categories to make a very viable and useful econ sub category. Inigmatus July 1, 2005 19:41 (UTC)
The {{ tax-stub}} has been created officially now and is open for final review. Inigmatus July 6, 2005 14:59 (UTC)
Created on June 24th by User:Roadrunner3000. Used by 32 articles. Conscious 3 July 2005 05:24 (UTC)
Created on July 5th, category contains 81 entries and needs some text added to it. Conscious 5 July 2005 04:55 (UTC)
User:Sarge Baldy is on a bit a bit of a roll with creating stub templates/categories and adding them to the Category:People stubs page.
I pointed out this project to him on his talk page last night, but two hours later he archived the entire page so I am not sure if he looked at it. If someone else want to point it out, feel free. -- TheParanoidOne 5 July 2005 05:51 (UTC)
Isn't this a subtopic of {{ comp-sci-stub}}? If so, that one isn't so big as to require splitting. On the other hand, there's a Wikipedia:WikiProject Computer science now, which listed it on their project page, and maybe they need it. In any case it's used on one article and the category hasn't been created. -- 84.152.153.113 21:25, 10 July 2005 (UTC) ( <= User:Grm_wnr not logged in)
Found this stub and category July 14 and inserted into WP:WSS/ST. The template was created in late June by User:Marianocecowski. Found as a sub-category under Category:South America stubs. Courtland 03:46, July 14, 2005 (UTC)
I found {{ statute-stub}} and Category:Statute stubs on 14 July 2005; I added them to WP:WSS/ST. The template was created on July 11 2005 by User:PullUpYourSocks. It is a subcategory of Category:Law stubs, and it already has ~85 articles. Based on the alphabetic distribution of the articles, many more articles will be added. — Fingers-of-Pyrex 02:28, July 15, 2005 (UTC)
Created yesterday by James Flinders ( talk · contribs). Discovered as a consequence of Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Sally Brabyn. The original template also applied Category:Halifax College stubs, but that was removed by 172.213.111.53 ( talk · contribs). Uncle G 10:31, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
I've moved the template to Cayman-stub (small s), but this one's still annoying. I saw it and thought "We don't even have a separate stub for crocodiles - what's going on", but no, this is for the Cayman Islands. Only 25 stubs, most of which are at least as well covered by Caribbean-geo-stub (since they are geo-stubs). At the very least this will need a rename. Grutness... wha? 11:41, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
I found {{ case-law-stub}} and {{ SCOTUS-case-stub}} (corresponding categories Category:Case law stubs and Category:U.S. Supreme Court stubs) on 21 July 2005; I added them to WP:WSS/ST. The templates were created on July 8 2005 and July 11 2005 by PullUpYourSocks. Category:Case law stubs is a subcategory of Category:Law stubs, and it has ~35 articles. Category:U.S. Supreme Court stubs is a subcategory of Category:Case law stubs, and it has ~35 articles. — Fingers-of-Pyrex 19:03, July 21, 2005 (UTC)
This one's a weird one. User:Naive cynic made it - as a redirect to the European geography stub category (weird enough, to start with). Then, a few days later, User:Juro activated it, creating a new Category:Slovakia geography stubs. He then proceeded to make it a subcategory of Category:Slovakia-related stubs, which he created, even though there was an already-extant Category:Slovakia stubs. It'd be really nice to know what's been going on. Oh, and at last count there were 53 Slovakian stubs, so it can be fairly well populated - it's just annoying that it'll require some work. Grutness... wha? 10:12, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
I'm not really here (I'm on wikibreak), but... All the stubs in the Euro category are in a database saying where they're from, and doing the work now and doing it when the stub is created means simply doiung the same amount of work - so nothing is saved in doing it early. In fact, if the stub is not going to be created, which is always possible, the work's been done for mothing. Using redirects also doubles the server load, since both the redirect and the "real" template have to be used. So creating an unproposed template early as a redirect actually increases the server load and potentially wastes energy that may never be needed. What's more, the database lists a lot of articles where the stub wasn't changed, and it will be a little extra work sorting which ones have and which ones haven't in restubbing, so it's created yet more work from that point of view. All in all, a considerable amount more work was created both in terms of server load and stub sorting, and it prompted someone else to create a duplicate category that may not otherwise have been made. I appreciate the thought behind what you did, but it was yet another of those good intentions that didn't really help. Grutness... wha? 06:47, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
I found this stub template by accident while sorting some of {{ bio-stub}}. It seems to have been created by an anon editor a week ago, without creating the matching category. It has three articles at present, although undoubtably more could be found. Should I create the category? -- ScottDavis 11:49, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
Created by User:Maoririder who seems to have created several out-of-process stub types recently. i have listed this one on SfD. DES (talk) 17:45, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
Created by User:Maoririder. No category. I have listed this on SfD also. DES (talk) 19:02, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
As with the previous two, created by User:Maoririder. No category. Limited scope. Listed on SfD. DES (talk) 19:29, 1 August 2005 (UTC)