Home • Search • Translate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< October 19 October 21 >

October 20

Template:Shiraz weatherbox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:43, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

unused and duplicates Shiraz#Climate. Frietjes ( talk) 21:37, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Original Thai Division 2 League Member Clubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13 Talk 21:32, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

provides no useful navigation. Frietjes ( talk) 21:06, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Oru Parish

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13 Talk 21:32, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

defunct. Frietjes ( talk) 21:02, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ottoman monuments of Skopje

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13 Talk 21:33, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

duplicates navigation provided by Template:Skopje. Frietjes ( talk) 20:16, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ottoman persons

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13 Talk 21:33, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

no clear inclusion criteria. Frietjes ( talk) 20:14, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

More unused meta/color and meta/shortname templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Should any of these find use, they can be REFUNDed. ( non-admin closure) Primefac ( talk) 04:42, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

per prior consensus, we delete unused meta/color and meta/shortname templates. Frietjes ( talk) 20:13, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Outreach article

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:44, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

old and unused. Frietjes ( talk) 20:10, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Overexposed track listing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete (non-admin closure) Primefac ( talk) 04:39, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

unused and redundant to navigation provided by {{ Maroon 5}}. Frietjes ( talk) 20:09, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Overground start

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete (non-admin closure) Primefac ( talk) 04:39, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

unused, redundant to {{ s-start}}. Frietjes ( talk) 20:08, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Delete It does a lot more than {{ s-start}} - that header row, for instance. But it is redundant to {{ rail start}}, since the London Overground is part of the National Rail system. -- Redrose64 ( talk) 09:05, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Oxford Catholic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13 Talk 21:34, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

better covered by a category. Frietjes ( talk) 20:05, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Oz group leader

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:44, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

unused and undocumented. could be replaced by {{ infobox}} if needed. Frietjes ( talk) 20:04, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:P-level

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was userfy to Useddenim's userspace. ~ Rob13 Talk 21:34, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

unused and undocumented. Frietjes ( talk) 20:03, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Delete It contains what looks like a portion of the wikicode for a table, but it's garbled on its own and it's difficult to see what use could be made of it. – Uanfala ( talk) 20:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. It is under development, but I haven't been working on it recently. The ultimate goal is for it to do the same for platform layouts as {{ S-line}} does for Railway lines. (Also, for the record, this is an improper nomination, as Frietjes never bothered to notify the author. Useddenim ( talk) 23:10, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply
    • Changing to keep or userfy then. – Uanfala ( talk) 21:52, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PAint/TP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:45, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

unused for a long time. parent template uses Module:Jctint/USA, and before that it used template:Jctint/core. Frietjes ( talk) 20:02, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Chicago Rush roster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:45, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

unused and empty. Frietjes ( talk) 16:06, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Major-Exams

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was userfy (non-admin closure) Frietjes ( talk) 12:04, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Unclear template and redundant to {{ Exams}}. Can be userfied if the creator wants it on their user page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:05, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Semi-wikibreak (simple)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 October 29 (non-admin closure) Primefac ( talk) 02:07, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:C.D.Trofense squad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. (non-admin closure) Primefac ( talk) 04:34, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

unused and out of date. Frietjes ( talk) 15:27, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Delete C.D. Trofense plays in 3rd tier of Portuguese football with few notable players, C.D. O'Higgins uses the template Template:O'Higgins squad instead. All notable players of the Basketball templates have left the clubs. Kq-hit ( talk) 21:29, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Buriram Province topics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 October 28 ~ Rob13 Talk 21:37, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bundesrat apportionment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:46, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

unused and duplicates Bundesrat of Germany#Composition. Frietjes ( talk) 15:23, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bullj

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:46, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

unused. Frietjes ( talk) 15:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

  • I'm tempted to !vote "keep" in order to keep the template's documentation. – Uanfala ( talk) 20:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bulgaria in the Eurovision Young Dancers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13 Talk 21:38, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

single use template. any content should be merged with the parent article, but the template is not needed. Frietjes ( talk) 15:20, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Gun politics by country

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete (non-admin closure) Primefac ( talk) 04:33, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

provides little navigation after most recent edits. Frietjes ( talk) 14:59, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. Only one entry. If there's ever a need again it can be re-created easily. Felsic2 ( talk) 15:10, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. The US is the only country that has "gun politics" as such. The template is not applicable to any other article. Scolaire ( talk) 21:42, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Playmates of 1961

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 October 29 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:28, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PD-WorldWind

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:49, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused license tag, replaceable by {{ PD-USGov-NASA}} FASTILY 08:19, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PD-USGov-NRO

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:49, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused license tag, replaceable by {{ PD-USGov}} FASTILY 08:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PD-USGov-NSA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:49, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused license tag, replaceable by {{ PD-USGov}} FASTILY 08:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PD-USGov-FSA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:49, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused license tag, replaceable by {{ PD-USGov}} FASTILY 08:16, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Calendar, clock, date and time computing templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 October 29 ~ Rob13 Talk 22:07, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox school marching band

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge (non-admin closure) Frietjes ( talk) 14:57, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Propose merging Template:Infobox school marching band with Template:Infobox college marching band.
These templates already have a nearly-identical set of parameters. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:10, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac ( talk) 04:56, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Spam blanked

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 October 28 (non-admin closure) Primefac ( talk) 04:47, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject Lua/Lua wikipedia colors

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13 Talk 21:42, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Besides its lone transclusion on Template:WikiProject Lua header/doc, I'm not able to see how this template could be used otherwise on other pages. Unless there can be a determined additional page where this template could be useful transcluded, this template should probably be substituted and deleted. Steel1943 ( talk) 23:52, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac ( talk) 02:01, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2016_October_20&oldid=1143416561"
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< October 19 October 21 >

October 20

Template:Shiraz weatherbox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:43, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

unused and duplicates Shiraz#Climate. Frietjes ( talk) 21:37, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Original Thai Division 2 League Member Clubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13 Talk 21:32, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

provides no useful navigation. Frietjes ( talk) 21:06, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Oru Parish

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13 Talk 21:32, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

defunct. Frietjes ( talk) 21:02, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ottoman monuments of Skopje

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13 Talk 21:33, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

duplicates navigation provided by Template:Skopje. Frietjes ( talk) 20:16, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ottoman persons

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13 Talk 21:33, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

no clear inclusion criteria. Frietjes ( talk) 20:14, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

More unused meta/color and meta/shortname templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Should any of these find use, they can be REFUNDed. ( non-admin closure) Primefac ( talk) 04:42, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

per prior consensus, we delete unused meta/color and meta/shortname templates. Frietjes ( talk) 20:13, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Outreach article

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:44, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

old and unused. Frietjes ( talk) 20:10, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Overexposed track listing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete (non-admin closure) Primefac ( talk) 04:39, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

unused and redundant to navigation provided by {{ Maroon 5}}. Frietjes ( talk) 20:09, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Overground start

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete (non-admin closure) Primefac ( talk) 04:39, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

unused, redundant to {{ s-start}}. Frietjes ( talk) 20:08, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Delete It does a lot more than {{ s-start}} - that header row, for instance. But it is redundant to {{ rail start}}, since the London Overground is part of the National Rail system. -- Redrose64 ( talk) 09:05, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Oxford Catholic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13 Talk 21:34, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

better covered by a category. Frietjes ( talk) 20:05, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Oz group leader

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:44, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

unused and undocumented. could be replaced by {{ infobox}} if needed. Frietjes ( talk) 20:04, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:P-level

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was userfy to Useddenim's userspace. ~ Rob13 Talk 21:34, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

unused and undocumented. Frietjes ( talk) 20:03, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Delete It contains what looks like a portion of the wikicode for a table, but it's garbled on its own and it's difficult to see what use could be made of it. – Uanfala ( talk) 20:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. It is under development, but I haven't been working on it recently. The ultimate goal is for it to do the same for platform layouts as {{ S-line}} does for Railway lines. (Also, for the record, this is an improper nomination, as Frietjes never bothered to notify the author. Useddenim ( talk) 23:10, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply
    • Changing to keep or userfy then. – Uanfala ( talk) 21:52, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PAint/TP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:45, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

unused for a long time. parent template uses Module:Jctint/USA, and before that it used template:Jctint/core. Frietjes ( talk) 20:02, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Chicago Rush roster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:45, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

unused and empty. Frietjes ( talk) 16:06, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Major-Exams

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was userfy (non-admin closure) Frietjes ( talk) 12:04, 22 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Unclear template and redundant to {{ Exams}}. Can be userfied if the creator wants it on their user page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:05, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Semi-wikibreak (simple)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 October 29 (non-admin closure) Primefac ( talk) 02:07, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:C.D.Trofense squad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. (non-admin closure) Primefac ( talk) 04:34, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

unused and out of date. Frietjes ( talk) 15:27, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Delete C.D. Trofense plays in 3rd tier of Portuguese football with few notable players, C.D. O'Higgins uses the template Template:O'Higgins squad instead. All notable players of the Basketball templates have left the clubs. Kq-hit ( talk) 21:29, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Buriram Province topics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 October 28 ~ Rob13 Talk 21:37, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bundesrat apportionment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:46, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

unused and duplicates Bundesrat of Germany#Composition. Frietjes ( talk) 15:23, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bullj

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:46, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

unused. Frietjes ( talk) 15:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

  • I'm tempted to !vote "keep" in order to keep the template's documentation. – Uanfala ( talk) 20:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bulgaria in the Eurovision Young Dancers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13 Talk 21:38, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

single use template. any content should be merged with the parent article, but the template is not needed. Frietjes ( talk) 15:20, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Gun politics by country

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete (non-admin closure) Primefac ( talk) 04:33, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

provides little navigation after most recent edits. Frietjes ( talk) 14:59, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. Only one entry. If there's ever a need again it can be re-created easily. Felsic2 ( talk) 15:10, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. The US is the only country that has "gun politics" as such. The template is not applicable to any other article. Scolaire ( talk) 21:42, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Playmates of 1961

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 October 29 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:28, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PD-WorldWind

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:49, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused license tag, replaceable by {{ PD-USGov-NASA}} FASTILY 08:19, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PD-USGov-NRO

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:49, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused license tag, replaceable by {{ PD-USGov}} FASTILY 08:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PD-USGov-NSA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:49, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused license tag, replaceable by {{ PD-USGov}} FASTILY 08:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PD-USGov-FSA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13 Talk 04:49, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused license tag, replaceable by {{ PD-USGov}} FASTILY 08:16, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Calendar, clock, date and time computing templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 October 29 ~ Rob13 Talk 22:07, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox school marching band

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge (non-admin closure) Frietjes ( talk) 14:57, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Propose merging Template:Infobox school marching band with Template:Infobox college marching band.
These templates already have a nearly-identical set of parameters. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:10, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac ( talk) 04:56, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Spam blanked

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 October 28 (non-admin closure) Primefac ( talk) 04:47, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject Lua/Lua wikipedia colors

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13 Talk 21:42, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Besides its lone transclusion on Template:WikiProject Lua header/doc, I'm not able to see how this template could be used otherwise on other pages. Unless there can be a determined additional page where this template could be useful transcluded, this template should probably be substituted and deleted. Steel1943 ( talk) 23:52, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac ( talk) 02:01, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2016_October_20&oldid=1143416561"

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook




Top Of Page

Home • Search • Translate

© CSE