The result of the discussion was merge, looks like these have already been merged, with no objections, so closing as merge. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:32, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:NLLTeamSeason with
Template:Infobox lacrosse team season.
I rewrote
template:infobox lacrosse team season to use
template:infobox, and in the process, noticed that it's basically a generalisation of
template:NLLTeamSeason. to confirm this is the case, I then rewrote
template:NLLTeamSeason to call
template:infobox lacrosse team season. basically, the only parameters being autofilled by
template:NLLTeamSeason are the league, league link, and cup. my proposal is to (1) substitute the wrapper that is currently used in
template:NLLTeamSeason, then (2) merge the early history of
template:NLLTeamSeason into
template:infobox lacrosse team season.
Frietjes (
talk) 20:53, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was speedy keep per WP:SNOWBALL and due to erroneous assumption in nomination. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:28, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
WP:SPAM. instead of external linking in the ordinary way, the main object seems to be to promote the brand name Longines. Could be solved by removing language identifying the source. The source is not so much in question as the content which receives scant attention. Student7 ( talk) 20:39, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:39, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
mostly redlinks. articles can be connected by other methods. Frietjes ( talk) 20:07, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was reformat as list articles. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:42, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Past 20 light-years distant from us, the distance from the sun is not an especially-noteworthy property of a star, thus these subjects are only loosely related to each other. These fail multiple criteria of navboxes as well. Per WP:NAVBOX, there should be an article on the subject of the navboxes, which there isn't in this case. The subject of the template is also not mentioned in each article. For these templates, the vast majority of articles contained within the navbox are also non-notable, which is an absolute no-no for navboxes. These also require near-constant maintenance to keep up-to-date due to the rapid-pace discoveries of new objects. StringTheory11 ( t • c) 15:27, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:43, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Not used on any pages. Excessively small and not needed. Therefore I propose deletion Tom (LT) ( talk) 08:02, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge. -- BDD ( talk) 18:42, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Routes of administration by organ system with
Template:Dosage forms.
Duplicate scope, so I propose merging these
Tom (LT) (
talk) 06:57, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge, looks like these have already been merged, with no objections, so closing as merge. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:32, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:NLLTeamSeason with
Template:Infobox lacrosse team season.
I rewrote
template:infobox lacrosse team season to use
template:infobox, and in the process, noticed that it's basically a generalisation of
template:NLLTeamSeason. to confirm this is the case, I then rewrote
template:NLLTeamSeason to call
template:infobox lacrosse team season. basically, the only parameters being autofilled by
template:NLLTeamSeason are the league, league link, and cup. my proposal is to (1) substitute the wrapper that is currently used in
template:NLLTeamSeason, then (2) merge the early history of
template:NLLTeamSeason into
template:infobox lacrosse team season.
Frietjes (
talk) 20:53, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was speedy keep per WP:SNOWBALL and due to erroneous assumption in nomination. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:28, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
WP:SPAM. instead of external linking in the ordinary way, the main object seems to be to promote the brand name Longines. Could be solved by removing language identifying the source. The source is not so much in question as the content which receives scant attention. Student7 ( talk) 20:39, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:39, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
mostly redlinks. articles can be connected by other methods. Frietjes ( talk) 20:07, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was reformat as list articles. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:42, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Past 20 light-years distant from us, the distance from the sun is not an especially-noteworthy property of a star, thus these subjects are only loosely related to each other. These fail multiple criteria of navboxes as well. Per WP:NAVBOX, there should be an article on the subject of the navboxes, which there isn't in this case. The subject of the template is also not mentioned in each article. For these templates, the vast majority of articles contained within the navbox are also non-notable, which is an absolute no-no for navboxes. These also require near-constant maintenance to keep up-to-date due to the rapid-pace discoveries of new objects. StringTheory11 ( t • c) 15:27, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:43, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Not used on any pages. Excessively small and not needed. Therefore I propose deletion Tom (LT) ( talk) 08:02, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge. -- BDD ( talk) 18:42, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Routes of administration by organ system with
Template:Dosage forms.
Duplicate scope, so I propose merging these
Tom (LT) (
talk) 06:57, 18 March 2015 (UTC)