The result of the discussion was rewrite as a wrapper Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:05, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
Redundant to {{ Infobox book}} - make it a wrapper? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:59, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Make wrapper I can see the use of having a uniform style for the Asterix books (given there are so many of them), but agree that it should wrap Infobox Book, instead of the generic Infobox. Bluap ( talk)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:09, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
Redundant to {{ Infobox station}}. Only 12 transclusions. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:41, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:55, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
Single use (on orphan article); hardcoded. Redundant to a more generic infobox? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:38, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:35, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
does not navigate much, and the two articles are already well linked. Frietjes ( talk) 19:36, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was move to sandbox, since it has been moved to the sandbox. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:42, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
unused template test. Frietjes ( talk) 19:35, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete. WP:CSD#G7 - only edits were by author (who is also nominator) and by Frietjes who gave consent below. Redrose64 ( talk) 18:36, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
Blank template, and given quite extensive debate unlikely to be used. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:37, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was rewrite as a wrapper Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:05, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
Redundant to {{ Infobox book}} - make it a wrapper? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:59, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Make wrapper I can see the use of having a uniform style for the Asterix books (given there are so many of them), but agree that it should wrap Infobox Book, instead of the generic Infobox. Bluap ( talk)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:09, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
Redundant to {{ Infobox station}}. Only 12 transclusions. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:41, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:55, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
Single use (on orphan article); hardcoded. Redundant to a more generic infobox? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:38, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:35, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
does not navigate much, and the two articles are already well linked. Frietjes ( talk) 19:36, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was move to sandbox, since it has been moved to the sandbox. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:42, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
unused template test. Frietjes ( talk) 19:35, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete. WP:CSD#G7 - only edits were by author (who is also nominator) and by Frietjes who gave consent below. Redrose64 ( talk) 18:36, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
Blank template, and given quite extensive debate unlikely to be used. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:37, 20 September 2012 (UTC)