Discovered in November. Used on 25 articles. IMO, it makes more sense to split stadium stubs by location, not stadium use. Delete because of that and small size. Conscious 07:06, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
Discovered in November. Used on 16 articles, 14 of which are about musicians and 1 about a band (and should thus go into other categories). Delete because a category with 1 article is too small (even 16, too). Conscious 07:06, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
Hardly used. The thought of its existance encourages every Tom, Dick, and Harry to write a Wikipedia article about their podcast. If a short article doesn't fit into a better category than this, it probably needs to be deleted as podcruft and for lack of encyclopedic merit or merged if applicable. — FREAK OF NURxTURE ( TALK) 10:34, Feb. 2, 2006
These two were discovered in November. They are used on 37 and 24 articles, respectively. I'm not quite sure if these templates and categories are in SFD scope, but they combine articles on specific topics on the basis of their completeness. I propose that we mark all stubs in these categories with (in)organic-compound-stub, mark all non-stubs with {{ expand}} and then delete these templates/categories. Conscious 07:06, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
Only a minor quibble here, but it may be worth changing. Saudi implies that it is about the royal family, rather than about the country. I've brought it here now because I'm going to be proposing a {{ SaudiArabia-geo-stub}} in the next few days, and it's worth getting them consistent. Wouldn't object if Saudi-stub was kept as a redirect, but I don't think it should be the basic template name. Grutness... wha? 06:35, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
Discovered in November, used on 4 articles. Too specific, delete. Conscious 10:57, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
Discovered in November, used on 2 articles. Too few, delete. Conscious 10:57, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
Recently created, used on one article (which is marginal for being a stub on length), proposed only after the fact. Delete this, as per previous similar meta-splits of {{ stub}} such as "unsorted stub". Alai 22:57, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
Following the creation of new stub categories, particularly Category:Amphibian stubs, this category is now restricted to reptiles, a fact which should be reflected in its title. Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals#Split_of_.7B.7Breptile-stub.7D.7D for relevant background. Stemonitis 07:49, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
from Alais list. Had three stubs and even if we added all the ones in Grutnesses last tally thered be less than 15. in any case the parent category is called french guiana not guyane. BL Lacertae - kiss the lizard 22:47, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
The rationale behind me creating these French overseas department stubs was that every other French (metropolitan) department has its own stub. Eventually, I imagine that these stubs would have a reasonable number of articles to justify their existence. Kiwipete 09:09, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
from Alais list. Had two stubs and even if we added all the ones in Grutnesses last tally thered be less than 15. BL Lacertae - kiss the lizard 22:47, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
from Alais list. Had three stubs and even if we added all the ones in Grutnesses last tally thered be less than 5. BL Lacertae - kiss the lizard 22:47, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
The vast majority of subcategories in Category:Companies use the wording "Foo companies". However, the top-level category for stubs about companies is Category:Corporation stubs, and the vast majority of its sub-categories use the wording "Foo corporation stubs". Their needs to be consistency in wording. As per types of companies, all corporations are companies, but not all companies are corporations. I am proposing that all stubs containing "corp" in their name and their parent-categories be renamed to use a wording based on the word "company", as it has a larger scope than "corporation". This proposal was offered at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals for discussion a week ago but received no responses. The following renamings are proposed:
Categories:
Templates: Please note that {{ comp-stub}} currently exists as a redirect to {{ compu-stub}}.
-- Kurieeto 18:28, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
Comment: All categories moved. All templates renamed and redirects kept. Redirects added to WP:WSS/R. -- TheParanoidOne 12:29, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
Not sure how this one escaped the "Great -Related Purge of 2005", but it did - rename'. Grutness... wha? 07:08, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
We've been a lot more lenient on redirects lately, which is perhaps a good thing - as long as it's clear what the redirect is for by looking at it, that seens to be acceptable. But - wthout looking at this redirect (no peeking now!) how many of you can tell what it's for? Any ideas? It's for {{ Johannesburg-stub}}. All of the articles that use it seem to be things which (if we had one) would be marked with johannesburg-geo-stub, anyway. Joburg I can accept as an abbreviation... but JNB? (BTW, it's the Joburg airport's three letter code, so it's like having YYZ-stub redirecting to Toronto-stub). Grutness... wha? 08:06, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
Used on only 5 articles (3 of which are lists), found potentially only 2 other articles for which this template could be used. No corresponding category. Articles should use {{ Caribbean-stub}} and {{ bcast-stub}} instead. DHowell 02:44, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
Used on one article. Alai 07:31, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
To properly earn its place in BJAODN, this should presumbly be deleted. Actually, my main complaint against it is it introduced a circularity into the categories (tad vexing when trying to construct transitive db queries, I'm here to tell you), which I've just removed. Alai 07:26, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Created a while ago, but used on only 6 articles. Too specific a topic, delete. Conscious 08:13, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Unused redirect to {{ confection-stub}}. The other two redirects created by the same user can be justified as redirects from an alternate name, but we generally avoid supporting misspellings. Caerwine Caerwhine 00:16, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
from Alais list. Empty now (had one stub). template has a box, which i dont think is right for stub templates(?) and well enough coverd by road-stub anyway. BL Lacertae - kiss the lizard 01:05, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
Used on one article. Seems to be two articles total on this publisher (hard to say, the "permanent parent" cat is a redlink). Company doesn't even seem to have published 60 titles, past or present, so probably unpopulatable, at least while the Greenland icecap's still with us. Lemmehearyasay delete. Alai 05:20, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
Used on one article, redlink category. (Can we speedy as malformed?) Alai 19:31, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
These are for Historical European Martial Arts (not sure why that's capitalized). However, the template name atleast is incorrect. It either ought to be {{ HEMA-stub}} or preferably some less-abbreviated form. The category also ought to be non-abbreviated However, it's possible this isn't large enough and should be deleted, as it's currently used on 19 articles, and there's less than 60 in both Cat:HEMA and its other child. Mairi 06:05, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
Update: Category:HEMA renamed to Category:Historical european martial arts. Conscious 19:00, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
BL missed this one last week. Four stubs (now in Cat:Caribbean geography stubs)which - together with the ones adequately categorised in Cat:Caribbean geography stubs makes a total of nine in all. A chronically undersized category - delete. Grutness... wha? 00:33, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
This one's existed over a year and still has only a dozen stubs. No need for a separate category, although we may want to start thinking about splitting some of the larger sections out of Cat:Russia geography stubs sometime. If we do, this won't be near the top of the list! Delete. Grutness... wha? 00:33, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
Did I spell that right? This one's more borderline, and there's a little irony here. It has about 20 stubs, still far too few for currently being needed. Six countries are covered by Cat:Central Asia geography stubs, with this being the only subcategory. The main category is hardly overfull (about 190 stubs). The irony is that every single one of the other countries have more geo-stubs than Kyrgysztan (and Mongolia and Kazakhstan are getting fairly close to the threshold for splitting). I'd suggest we delete the category and redirect the template to Cat:Central Asia geography stubs, on the likelihood that this may one day prove useful for splitting the stubs. Grutness... wha? 00:33, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
One article. Usual moans. Alai 05:31, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
Summary Category renamed to "Mexico television stubs" as part of a rescope. -- TheParanoidOne 22:57, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
An attempt (unproposed) to split geo-stubs by type - which has been rejected on other stub types in the past, and a fairly useless one, too. The category contained three "stubs" - one was far too big tio be considered such, one was about a military operation and the third was a perfectly acceptable Texas-geo-stub (which is how it is now marked). Would not be useful for either stub-sorting or editorsa looking for articles to improve. Delete. Grutness... wha? 06:49, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
While the parent, Cat:United States broadcasting stubs needs to be split, doing it two articles at a time is not a plan. Excessively narrow, delete. Alai 05:13, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
Two articles, no vast size or obvious undersorting of parent. Alai 05:19, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
Three articles. Unreasonably narrow category. Alai 05:24, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
Been around for two months, and only three articles. Seems too narrow. Alai 15:36, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk about cutting across the hierarchy! This one contains five stubs - including a US-politician-stub, a US-gov-stub, a local organisation from Tacoma, a term used in espionage, and a Korean police force. Quite a bizarre mixture for quite a bizarre idea for a stub type. It is possible that some countries could use individual government agency stubs, but a cross-border haphazard agglomeration like this is going to be useful to no-one. Delete! Grutness... wha? 07:00, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
Delete. Not used and I don't see any particular potential either. Created in November 12 2005 so it's not just recently created pending populating either. Feeds into the exsisting Category:Television stubs so no asosiated cat. -- Sherool (talk) 01:37, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
Rename the category with a lower-case 's'. Per discussion at /Discoveries, it's a perfectly good stub, already populated, the only issue is the capitalization. - GTBacchus( talk) 06:49, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
Ive listed this for renaming to Cat:Articles with sections needing expansion at cfd, since its not really aything to do with stubs. please add your vote one way of the other there (or tell me i was wrong and it should have been here :) BL Lacertae - kiss the lizard 12:55, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
While it's doubtful whether we even need a separate category for the 19 Macedonian biography stubs, we definitely don't need this badly named duplicate of {{ Macedonia-bio-stub}}. Delete. Grutness... wha? 23:40, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
Rename the category to a lower-case 'g'. This was already mentioned when it was listed on /discoveries and could probably get speedied if that was ever done with stub categories. Also, the category is only used in 45 articles so someone might want to delete it. However, that's up from the 20 that it was on when at /discoveries, so it seems that there's potential for growth. (If someone wants to delete, remember to tag the stub template with {{ sfd-t}}).- Bobet 13:02, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
Delete. Possibly a prank; only contains a link to a non-existent image. Did not seem to meet the definition of patent nonsense, else I'd have speedied it. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 05:49, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
Per CFD nomination here, rename category to Cat:Rapid transit stubs and the template to... {{ RapidTransit-stub}}? I don't like that, but will throw it out for consideration. It should be noted that the text itself was changed long ago. -- CComMack 22:15, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
Rename to concord with numerous permanents using this terminology, and the couple of other stub types. (It's also somewhat small, but I wouldn't object to giving it a while to grow before upmerging to the (also very new) people-parent: especially as the other parent is oversized.) Alai 18:53, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
never proposed or debated. unneccessary since its already covered by other stubs which are too small to need splitting. deals with geo stubs, bio stubs, and other stubs all lumped together. very POV use (by only one editor) which is likely to cause all sorts of problems. btw this was origionaly at tfd - ive moved the debate so far here. delete. BL Lacertae - kiss the lizard 22:50, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
what is this and is it speedyable as nonsense? it isnt anything that should be called a stub template! BL Lacertae - kiss the lizard 22:31, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
Created on December 22nd 2005 and used on only 2 articles. Website stubs is at ~650 stubs so probably needs splitting. This doesn't seem the way to go though. -- TheParanoidOne 22:19, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
Seemingly kept from previous nom (or perhaps, no consensus, and/or no clarity...), but cat is still tagged as a SFD. Similar "sorted section stub" cases have indicated a firmer feeling more recently to delete, or to rename to something outwith the stub hierarchy and naming pattern. Alai 04:04, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
Created in January 2006 and used on only 1 article. -- TheParanoidOne 21:58, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
Created on 7th Feb. Used on 5 articles at the moment. Seems far too narrow a scope. Category:Biology stubs is at just over 400 stubs so wouldn't be overburdened by pushing these into it. In an amusing bit of self reference, the Computational phylogenetics article is itself a stub and marked as a {{ Comp-phylo-stub}}. -- TheParanoidOne 21:47, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
Summary: Rescoped to {{ bioinformatics-stub}} and Category:Bioinformatics stubs. -- TheParanoidOne 14:05, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
Created on December 10th 2005 and used on only 3 articles. Parent stub category Medicine stubs is at 12 pages so it's possible that this one might be worthwhile. My suggestion is delete unless populated by the requisite stub category threshold. -- TheParanoidOne 22:27, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
Created on January 9th 2006 and used on only 2 articles. -- TheParanoidOne 22:07, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
No associated template. Created in April 2005 by an anon. Used on three stubs. -- TheParanoidOne 21:15, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
Used on three articles; scope is not defined at all, seems to be used on military history articles, but with a tag this open-ended, could end up over any number of politics articles, and what-not, which I double is desirable. Alai 05:49, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
Used on seven articles, all political biographies. Large, if not total, overlap with Cat:American Civil War stubs and existing politicos categories. Alai 05:59, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
Created in December 2005. Used on four stubs, all of which should have some form of {{ musician-stub}} applied. -- TheParanoidOne 21:20, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
Both created on 26th January and only used on 4 stubs. The parent stub category Novel stubs is at ~550 stubs and should probably be split in a better way than this. -- TheParanoidOne 22:51, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
Discovered in November. Used on 25 articles. IMO, it makes more sense to split stadium stubs by location, not stadium use. Delete because of that and small size. Conscious 07:06, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
Discovered in November. Used on 16 articles, 14 of which are about musicians and 1 about a band (and should thus go into other categories). Delete because a category with 1 article is too small (even 16, too). Conscious 07:06, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
Hardly used. The thought of its existance encourages every Tom, Dick, and Harry to write a Wikipedia article about their podcast. If a short article doesn't fit into a better category than this, it probably needs to be deleted as podcruft and for lack of encyclopedic merit or merged if applicable. — FREAK OF NURxTURE ( TALK) 10:34, Feb. 2, 2006
These two were discovered in November. They are used on 37 and 24 articles, respectively. I'm not quite sure if these templates and categories are in SFD scope, but they combine articles on specific topics on the basis of their completeness. I propose that we mark all stubs in these categories with (in)organic-compound-stub, mark all non-stubs with {{ expand}} and then delete these templates/categories. Conscious 07:06, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
Only a minor quibble here, but it may be worth changing. Saudi implies that it is about the royal family, rather than about the country. I've brought it here now because I'm going to be proposing a {{ SaudiArabia-geo-stub}} in the next few days, and it's worth getting them consistent. Wouldn't object if Saudi-stub was kept as a redirect, but I don't think it should be the basic template name. Grutness... wha? 06:35, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
Discovered in November, used on 4 articles. Too specific, delete. Conscious 10:57, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
Discovered in November, used on 2 articles. Too few, delete. Conscious 10:57, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
Recently created, used on one article (which is marginal for being a stub on length), proposed only after the fact. Delete this, as per previous similar meta-splits of {{ stub}} such as "unsorted stub". Alai 22:57, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
Following the creation of new stub categories, particularly Category:Amphibian stubs, this category is now restricted to reptiles, a fact which should be reflected in its title. Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals#Split_of_.7B.7Breptile-stub.7D.7D for relevant background. Stemonitis 07:49, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
from Alais list. Had three stubs and even if we added all the ones in Grutnesses last tally thered be less than 15. in any case the parent category is called french guiana not guyane. BL Lacertae - kiss the lizard 22:47, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
The rationale behind me creating these French overseas department stubs was that every other French (metropolitan) department has its own stub. Eventually, I imagine that these stubs would have a reasonable number of articles to justify their existence. Kiwipete 09:09, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
from Alais list. Had two stubs and even if we added all the ones in Grutnesses last tally thered be less than 15. BL Lacertae - kiss the lizard 22:47, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
from Alais list. Had three stubs and even if we added all the ones in Grutnesses last tally thered be less than 5. BL Lacertae - kiss the lizard 22:47, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
The vast majority of subcategories in Category:Companies use the wording "Foo companies". However, the top-level category for stubs about companies is Category:Corporation stubs, and the vast majority of its sub-categories use the wording "Foo corporation stubs". Their needs to be consistency in wording. As per types of companies, all corporations are companies, but not all companies are corporations. I am proposing that all stubs containing "corp" in their name and their parent-categories be renamed to use a wording based on the word "company", as it has a larger scope than "corporation". This proposal was offered at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals for discussion a week ago but received no responses. The following renamings are proposed:
Categories:
Templates: Please note that {{ comp-stub}} currently exists as a redirect to {{ compu-stub}}.
-- Kurieeto 18:28, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
Comment: All categories moved. All templates renamed and redirects kept. Redirects added to WP:WSS/R. -- TheParanoidOne 12:29, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
Not sure how this one escaped the "Great -Related Purge of 2005", but it did - rename'. Grutness... wha? 07:08, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
We've been a lot more lenient on redirects lately, which is perhaps a good thing - as long as it's clear what the redirect is for by looking at it, that seens to be acceptable. But - wthout looking at this redirect (no peeking now!) how many of you can tell what it's for? Any ideas? It's for {{ Johannesburg-stub}}. All of the articles that use it seem to be things which (if we had one) would be marked with johannesburg-geo-stub, anyway. Joburg I can accept as an abbreviation... but JNB? (BTW, it's the Joburg airport's three letter code, so it's like having YYZ-stub redirecting to Toronto-stub). Grutness... wha? 08:06, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
Used on only 5 articles (3 of which are lists), found potentially only 2 other articles for which this template could be used. No corresponding category. Articles should use {{ Caribbean-stub}} and {{ bcast-stub}} instead. DHowell 02:44, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
Used on one article. Alai 07:31, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
To properly earn its place in BJAODN, this should presumbly be deleted. Actually, my main complaint against it is it introduced a circularity into the categories (tad vexing when trying to construct transitive db queries, I'm here to tell you), which I've just removed. Alai 07:26, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Created a while ago, but used on only 6 articles. Too specific a topic, delete. Conscious 08:13, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Unused redirect to {{ confection-stub}}. The other two redirects created by the same user can be justified as redirects from an alternate name, but we generally avoid supporting misspellings. Caerwine Caerwhine 00:16, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
from Alais list. Empty now (had one stub). template has a box, which i dont think is right for stub templates(?) and well enough coverd by road-stub anyway. BL Lacertae - kiss the lizard 01:05, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
Used on one article. Seems to be two articles total on this publisher (hard to say, the "permanent parent" cat is a redlink). Company doesn't even seem to have published 60 titles, past or present, so probably unpopulatable, at least while the Greenland icecap's still with us. Lemmehearyasay delete. Alai 05:20, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
Used on one article, redlink category. (Can we speedy as malformed?) Alai 19:31, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
These are for Historical European Martial Arts (not sure why that's capitalized). However, the template name atleast is incorrect. It either ought to be {{ HEMA-stub}} or preferably some less-abbreviated form. The category also ought to be non-abbreviated However, it's possible this isn't large enough and should be deleted, as it's currently used on 19 articles, and there's less than 60 in both Cat:HEMA and its other child. Mairi 06:05, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
Update: Category:HEMA renamed to Category:Historical european martial arts. Conscious 19:00, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
BL missed this one last week. Four stubs (now in Cat:Caribbean geography stubs)which - together with the ones adequately categorised in Cat:Caribbean geography stubs makes a total of nine in all. A chronically undersized category - delete. Grutness... wha? 00:33, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
This one's existed over a year and still has only a dozen stubs. No need for a separate category, although we may want to start thinking about splitting some of the larger sections out of Cat:Russia geography stubs sometime. If we do, this won't be near the top of the list! Delete. Grutness... wha? 00:33, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
Did I spell that right? This one's more borderline, and there's a little irony here. It has about 20 stubs, still far too few for currently being needed. Six countries are covered by Cat:Central Asia geography stubs, with this being the only subcategory. The main category is hardly overfull (about 190 stubs). The irony is that every single one of the other countries have more geo-stubs than Kyrgysztan (and Mongolia and Kazakhstan are getting fairly close to the threshold for splitting). I'd suggest we delete the category and redirect the template to Cat:Central Asia geography stubs, on the likelihood that this may one day prove useful for splitting the stubs. Grutness... wha? 00:33, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
One article. Usual moans. Alai 05:31, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
Summary Category renamed to "Mexico television stubs" as part of a rescope. -- TheParanoidOne 22:57, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
An attempt (unproposed) to split geo-stubs by type - which has been rejected on other stub types in the past, and a fairly useless one, too. The category contained three "stubs" - one was far too big tio be considered such, one was about a military operation and the third was a perfectly acceptable Texas-geo-stub (which is how it is now marked). Would not be useful for either stub-sorting or editorsa looking for articles to improve. Delete. Grutness... wha? 06:49, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
While the parent, Cat:United States broadcasting stubs needs to be split, doing it two articles at a time is not a plan. Excessively narrow, delete. Alai 05:13, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
Two articles, no vast size or obvious undersorting of parent. Alai 05:19, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
Three articles. Unreasonably narrow category. Alai 05:24, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
Been around for two months, and only three articles. Seems too narrow. Alai 15:36, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk about cutting across the hierarchy! This one contains five stubs - including a US-politician-stub, a US-gov-stub, a local organisation from Tacoma, a term used in espionage, and a Korean police force. Quite a bizarre mixture for quite a bizarre idea for a stub type. It is possible that some countries could use individual government agency stubs, but a cross-border haphazard agglomeration like this is going to be useful to no-one. Delete! Grutness... wha? 07:00, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
Delete. Not used and I don't see any particular potential either. Created in November 12 2005 so it's not just recently created pending populating either. Feeds into the exsisting Category:Television stubs so no asosiated cat. -- Sherool (talk) 01:37, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
Rename the category with a lower-case 's'. Per discussion at /Discoveries, it's a perfectly good stub, already populated, the only issue is the capitalization. - GTBacchus( talk) 06:49, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
Ive listed this for renaming to Cat:Articles with sections needing expansion at cfd, since its not really aything to do with stubs. please add your vote one way of the other there (or tell me i was wrong and it should have been here :) BL Lacertae - kiss the lizard 12:55, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
While it's doubtful whether we even need a separate category for the 19 Macedonian biography stubs, we definitely don't need this badly named duplicate of {{ Macedonia-bio-stub}}. Delete. Grutness... wha? 23:40, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
Rename the category to a lower-case 'g'. This was already mentioned when it was listed on /discoveries and could probably get speedied if that was ever done with stub categories. Also, the category is only used in 45 articles so someone might want to delete it. However, that's up from the 20 that it was on when at /discoveries, so it seems that there's potential for growth. (If someone wants to delete, remember to tag the stub template with {{ sfd-t}}).- Bobet 13:02, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
Delete. Possibly a prank; only contains a link to a non-existent image. Did not seem to meet the definition of patent nonsense, else I'd have speedied it. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 05:49, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
Per CFD nomination here, rename category to Cat:Rapid transit stubs and the template to... {{ RapidTransit-stub}}? I don't like that, but will throw it out for consideration. It should be noted that the text itself was changed long ago. -- CComMack 22:15, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
Rename to concord with numerous permanents using this terminology, and the couple of other stub types. (It's also somewhat small, but I wouldn't object to giving it a while to grow before upmerging to the (also very new) people-parent: especially as the other parent is oversized.) Alai 18:53, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
never proposed or debated. unneccessary since its already covered by other stubs which are too small to need splitting. deals with geo stubs, bio stubs, and other stubs all lumped together. very POV use (by only one editor) which is likely to cause all sorts of problems. btw this was origionaly at tfd - ive moved the debate so far here. delete. BL Lacertae - kiss the lizard 22:50, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
what is this and is it speedyable as nonsense? it isnt anything that should be called a stub template! BL Lacertae - kiss the lizard 22:31, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
Created on December 22nd 2005 and used on only 2 articles. Website stubs is at ~650 stubs so probably needs splitting. This doesn't seem the way to go though. -- TheParanoidOne 22:19, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
Seemingly kept from previous nom (or perhaps, no consensus, and/or no clarity...), but cat is still tagged as a SFD. Similar "sorted section stub" cases have indicated a firmer feeling more recently to delete, or to rename to something outwith the stub hierarchy and naming pattern. Alai 04:04, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
Created in January 2006 and used on only 1 article. -- TheParanoidOne 21:58, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
Created on 7th Feb. Used on 5 articles at the moment. Seems far too narrow a scope. Category:Biology stubs is at just over 400 stubs so wouldn't be overburdened by pushing these into it. In an amusing bit of self reference, the Computational phylogenetics article is itself a stub and marked as a {{ Comp-phylo-stub}}. -- TheParanoidOne 21:47, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
Summary: Rescoped to {{ bioinformatics-stub}} and Category:Bioinformatics stubs. -- TheParanoidOne 14:05, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
Created on December 10th 2005 and used on only 3 articles. Parent stub category Medicine stubs is at 12 pages so it's possible that this one might be worthwhile. My suggestion is delete unless populated by the requisite stub category threshold. -- TheParanoidOne 22:27, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
Created on January 9th 2006 and used on only 2 articles. -- TheParanoidOne 22:07, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
No associated template. Created in April 2005 by an anon. Used on three stubs. -- TheParanoidOne 21:15, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
Used on three articles; scope is not defined at all, seems to be used on military history articles, but with a tag this open-ended, could end up over any number of politics articles, and what-not, which I double is desirable. Alai 05:49, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
Used on seven articles, all political biographies. Large, if not total, overlap with Cat:American Civil War stubs and existing politicos categories. Alai 05:59, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
Created in December 2005. Used on four stubs, all of which should have some form of {{ musician-stub}} applied. -- TheParanoidOne 21:20, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
Both created on 26th January and only used on 4 stubs. The parent stub category Novel stubs is at ~550 stubs and should probably be split in a better way than this. -- TheParanoidOne 22:51, 28 February 2006 (UTC)