SPA that continues edit war off from another Editor [1] [2] Avono ( talk) 11:48, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Uniquark9 apparently used the suspected sock account to perform a total of six reversions of disputed content at Mongol Empire yesterday, despite repeated entreaties to discuss the issue. He also used the suspected sock to make comments in agreement in the discussion. And he removed a comment from the talk page raising suspicion of his sock puppetry ( [3]). The sock account was created during the time frame of the dispute. Laszlo Panaflex ( talk) 15:21, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Clerk note: Tagged the puppet. Closing.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 01:18, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
The user Uniquark9 was blocked last month for using a sock under very similar circumstances; he blanked his talk page to hide evidence of that. Then and now he engaged in lengthy edit wars, violating 3RR, this time at Genghis Khan ( history). He then uses his sock in the discussion on the talk page to agree with himself ( discussion, diff). The talk page for Ceithe has been used by Uniquark9 apparently to store notes (I cannot read the language used), but then was similarly blanked. Uniquark9 racked up six reversions on the Genghis Khan page in a matter of a few hours yesterday. He also calls other users vandals or trolls for making good faith edits (see in this discussion and at Mongol empire). He routinely removes sourced content and when challenged he claims the sources are made up or "not mainstream" ( example, regarding Encyclopedia Britannica). Then he supplements his argument with the sock agreeing with him. In this case the sock uses the same "not mainstream" argument about the source he doesn't like. (The previous investigation was raised by @ Avono:, who has also asked Uniquark9 to cease his disruptive editing.) Laszlo Panaflex ( talk) 14:41, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
It is worth noting here, for future referemce, that User:Ceithe has now been blocked indefinitely as a sock account of User:Ancientsteppe, which has also been blocked indefinitely. This confirms suspicions raised here and in a related ANI that Uniquark9, Ceithe, and unknown others are all linked and repeatedly using sockpuppet accounts. Laszlo Panaflex ( talk) 01:04, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Lol. Is it sockputting if somebody edit without logging? Read before accusing people: Defending yourself against claims. And I am not User:188.158.104.214. Uniquark9 ( talk) 19:04, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
This is my ip 66.65.0.132 ( talk) 19:05, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
https://db-ip.com/all/188.158.104 this is from Iran. https://db-ip.com/66.65.0.132 is from the US. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uniquark9 ( talk • contribs) 20:12, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
I don't think Evecurid is a sock of Uniquark, if Ceithe is a sock of Uniquark, as Ceitha and Evecurid have disagreed - see Talk:Genghis Khan#further discussion.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me | See what I have done) 01:57, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
Clerk endorsed. Perhaps we'll make more headway with a new CU than we did with the last one. Ceithe mainly leaves messages in Mongolian (according to Google anyway). Once, again according to Google, he spoke in Yoruba language. Also the account Byamba tuguldur ( talk · contribs · count) looks somewhat suspicious because Ceithe left a message on their Talk page as well and because the user says they are Mongolian. That's all I have to go on with that account, so it's up to the CU if they want to include it. The one thing that stands out above everything else is that the master is tremendously disruptive irrespective of socking.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 20:44, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
SPA that continues edit war off from another Editor [1] [2] Avono ( talk) 11:48, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Uniquark9 apparently used the suspected sock account to perform a total of six reversions of disputed content at Mongol Empire yesterday, despite repeated entreaties to discuss the issue. He also used the suspected sock to make comments in agreement in the discussion. And he removed a comment from the talk page raising suspicion of his sock puppetry ( [3]). The sock account was created during the time frame of the dispute. Laszlo Panaflex ( talk) 15:21, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Clerk note: Tagged the puppet. Closing.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 01:18, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
The user Uniquark9 was blocked last month for using a sock under very similar circumstances; he blanked his talk page to hide evidence of that. Then and now he engaged in lengthy edit wars, violating 3RR, this time at Genghis Khan ( history). He then uses his sock in the discussion on the talk page to agree with himself ( discussion, diff). The talk page for Ceithe has been used by Uniquark9 apparently to store notes (I cannot read the language used), but then was similarly blanked. Uniquark9 racked up six reversions on the Genghis Khan page in a matter of a few hours yesterday. He also calls other users vandals or trolls for making good faith edits (see in this discussion and at Mongol empire). He routinely removes sourced content and when challenged he claims the sources are made up or "not mainstream" ( example, regarding Encyclopedia Britannica). Then he supplements his argument with the sock agreeing with him. In this case the sock uses the same "not mainstream" argument about the source he doesn't like. (The previous investigation was raised by @ Avono:, who has also asked Uniquark9 to cease his disruptive editing.) Laszlo Panaflex ( talk) 14:41, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
It is worth noting here, for future referemce, that User:Ceithe has now been blocked indefinitely as a sock account of User:Ancientsteppe, which has also been blocked indefinitely. This confirms suspicions raised here and in a related ANI that Uniquark9, Ceithe, and unknown others are all linked and repeatedly using sockpuppet accounts. Laszlo Panaflex ( talk) 01:04, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Lol. Is it sockputting if somebody edit without logging? Read before accusing people: Defending yourself against claims. And I am not User:188.158.104.214. Uniquark9 ( talk) 19:04, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
This is my ip 66.65.0.132 ( talk) 19:05, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
https://db-ip.com/all/188.158.104 this is from Iran. https://db-ip.com/66.65.0.132 is from the US. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uniquark9 ( talk • contribs) 20:12, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
I don't think Evecurid is a sock of Uniquark, if Ceithe is a sock of Uniquark, as Ceitha and Evecurid have disagreed - see Talk:Genghis Khan#further discussion.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me | See what I have done) 01:57, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
Clerk endorsed. Perhaps we'll make more headway with a new CU than we did with the last one. Ceithe mainly leaves messages in Mongolian (according to Google anyway). Once, again according to Google, he spoke in Yoruba language. Also the account Byamba tuguldur ( talk · contribs · count) looks somewhat suspicious because Ceithe left a message on their Talk page as well and because the user says they are Mongolian. That's all I have to go on with that account, so it's up to the CU if they want to include it. The one thing that stands out above everything else is that the master is tremendously disruptive irrespective of socking.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 20:44, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.