Home • Search • Translate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



AndresHerutJaim

AndresHerutJaim ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:

18 December 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

See below. Bbb23 ( talk) 23:15, 18 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

@ Bbb23: account "IWeaponsv" is not registered, it appears red in the list above. Just checking that's not a typo on your part. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 17:09, 21 December 2016 (UTC) reply
@ Ivanvector: Typo and now fixed. Thanks for catching it.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 18:07, 21 December 2016 (UTC) reply

19 December 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Duck: sole edit so far was a crabby revert to Palestinian women, 5 minutes after referenced content was re-added [1], identical to those of blocked sock User:Perverticecream a month ago: [2], [3] Wikishovel ( talk) 07:49, 19 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

01 January 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

User made 500 dummy edits to their userspace in order to be extended confirmed to edit United Nations Security Council Resolution 2334. This is the same tactic sock User:Fexlajahd used in order to edit other Palestine-Israel articles. Aside from that, there's also intersection at the Palestinian women article: [4] [5] [6] Sro23 ( talk) 16:42, 1 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

11 January 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Look, it's another sockpuppet who made 500 dummy edits to their userspace in order to gain extended confirmed access and immediately start disrupting Palestine-Israel articles, just like past socks User:Fexlajahd and User:Annestorm. They also seem to have a problem grasping WP:CV just like Annestorm as evidenced by their edits on Palestinians. CU is needed because every time a huge amount of sleepers are discovered. Sro23 ( talk) 02:09, 11 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Looks like User:Delotrooladoo is back at it again. The user makes unwarranted edits at Palestinian articles, Jewish articles and in the below examples, articles about people of Jewish descent who are Armenian Genocide deniers. The user doesn't stop (master user was blocked on the 18th of December 2016) and even uses IPs to carry on.

This edit was recently made by a new SPA sock called User:Oo Eddie oO.

This edit was formerly made on the 5th of December 2016 by Delotrooladoo's confirmed sock User:Angelsi 1989 here, and repeated by sockpuppet IPs during the rest of the month here, here and here. See also this one here. All of those edits were made at Bernard Lewis; notice the similarities and chronological continuity.

The blocked sockpuppet User:Angelsi 1989 also made similar edits at Guenter Lewy - here and here.

It seems that this particular user only likes to focus on articles related to Jewish and Palestinian people. He even makes it clear here, on his own unblock request.

Please therefore add:

-- 92slim ( talk) 08:27, 11 January 2017 (UTC) reply

@ 92slim: What is this nonsense, do you accuse me or is it just an argument to ban me from editing?. I'm editing articles relating to Palestinians but not Jews, if you think the Palestinians are Jews, you are wrong. All that you said is wrong or justified to block me on Wikipedia.
@ Euryalus: Look at this nonsense from user 92slim, and can you explain to the user Sro23 about (made 500 dummy edits).-- Marlo Jonesa ( talk) 09:32, 11 January 2017 (UTC) reply
You made 500 dummy edits in order to become autoconfirmed. This may or may not have been in good faith; unfortunately it's exactly the same tactic used by socks of Delotrooladoo, and it is referenced here as part of the suggestion that you are the same user. The presentation of this kind of evidence is standard at SPIs. If you are not user:Delotrooladoo and this similarity is a coincidence, then that will no doubt be apparent in an analysis of the rest of your edits. -- Euryalus ( talk) 10:39, 11 January 2017 (UTC) reply
@ Marlo Jonesa: I'm not the one accusing you, that was User:Sro23. Perhaps read carefully what the accusations are before writing nonsense yourself. -- 92slim ( talk) 09:35, 11 January 2017 (UTC) reply
As you say: by sockpuppet IPs during the rest of the month here, here and here. See also this one here. from this IP 186.137.232.97 from Argentina and I'm from Zurich, Switzerland!!.-- Marlo Jonesa ( talk) 09:58, 11 January 2017 (UTC) reply
@ Marlo Jonesa: Have you even read the page you're in? It's Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Delotrooladoo. As I said, I'm not the one accusing you, that was User:Sro23. You happen to not understand anything I write. Please read who's accusing who and for what. -- 92slim ( talk) 10:15, 11 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Marlo Jonesa is Red X Unrelated. Oo Eddie oO is  Confirmed, blocked and tagged.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 15:24, 11 January 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Closing. IPs are weeks old, so no action to be taken at the moment. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:09, 12 January 2017 (UTC) reply

21 February 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

See findings below. Bbb23 ( talk) 15:26, 21 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

I would like to draw your attention to this recently created Sstella12 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki) which has the same edits as Bamboozled_Shaare. -- Hyperzion ( talk) 20:19, 21 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

09 March 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

See below. Bbb23 ( talk) 22:02, 9 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


10 March 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

New account, immediately reinstates sockpuppet's edits. [7] [8] [9] [10] Sro23 ( talk) 03:06, 10 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  Looks like a duck to me. GAB gab 14:12, 10 March 2017 (UTC) reply
I agree. Blocked without tags. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 14:46, 10 March 2017 (UTC) reply
On second thought, tagged, per previous cases. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 14:49, 10 March 2017 (UTC) reply

20 March 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Fream Yogur: Intersection with User:Angelsi 1989. [11] [12]. As for the rest, they all demonstrate WP:OWN problems, WP:GAME (see how the Oxbird became autoconfirmed through User:Oxbird/sandbox) and high overlap mainly with the sock User:Iphone4 hateparents. [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] Sro23 ( talk) 00:01, 20 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

22 March 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

restoring sock User:Oxbird's edits ( [19] [20] [21] [22]) Sro23 ( talk) 01:03, 22 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

09 April 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

See WP:OWN and intersection with past sock on Mohammad Khaleel Jamjoum. [23] [24] The username is supposed to be mocking the user with whom they are in dispute with. They done this before, for example User:Yh98a. Sro23 ( talk) 17:51, 9 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


14 April 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Like almost all other socks, made a single edit almost immediately after registration (in this case, registered at 02:34 with first edit at 02:35), concerned with POV-pushing on topics pertaining to Geert Wilders/description of his ideology, as well as Islamophobia. For previous socks' activity on these topics, see [25] [26] [27] for examples of previous activity within this area. See also: previous case report of 22 March. Mélencron ( talk) 05:10, 14 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


21 April 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

  Looks like a duck to me: [28] [29]. CU may be necessary for sleepers, but one was just conducted, so... GAB gab 01:20, 21 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I've added a few more WP:DUCKs. Sro23 ( talk) 01:25, 21 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Please block the sock. Thanks, GAB gab 01:21, 21 April 2017 (UTC) reply

 Clerk note: Indeffing w/o tags and closing.
 —  Berean Hunter (talk) 07:29, 21 April 2017 (UTC) reply

29 May 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Same kind of SPA account in the same kind of topic area - [30] [31] - same methods of achieving autoconfirmed status: [32]. Sro23 ( talk) 01:06, 29 May 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

10 July 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Delotrooladoo keeps returning to the same topics with the same point of view and ownership. Operation Ezra and Nehemiah: [33] [34], Jeremy Corbyn: [35] [36], Jews: [37] [38], Linda Sarsour: [39] [40], as well as the dummy edits this sockmaster is known for: [41] [42]. Requested CU to see if additional accounts may be found. Sro23 ( talk) 03:23, 10 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

13 July 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Noticed this new user restoring what User:ZhengaryChen did. [43] [44] [45] [46] Sro23 ( talk) 01:32, 13 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

14 July 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Making edits in same subject area persistently, swapping IP addresses. 331dot ( talk) 17:27, 14 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Additional information needed - @ 331dot: In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
  1. At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
  2. At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
  3. In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:35, 14 July 2017 (UTC) reply
I was mostly relying on what Doug Weller said here. However looking at a few of the edits made by established socks of this user, the attitude seems consistent. The attitude of the IP users seem consistent with that named user as well. 331dot ( talk) 17:42, 14 July 2017 (UTC) reply
We don't normally comment on IPs. However, if this is a sock, I suspect blocking wouldn't help as they'd just get another IP address, so I've semi-protected the article for 2 weeks. Doug Weller talk 18:08, 14 July 2017 (UTC) reply
I was not aware of the correct procedure here, and I apologize. 331dot ( talk) 18:11, 14 July 2017 (UTC) reply

21 July 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Fits the pattern of making 10 minor edits and then once autoconfirmed, immediately returning to articles Delotrooladoo can't seem to leave alone. [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] CU requested to look for additional accounts. Sro23 ( talk) 01:44, 21 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

11 September 2017

Suspected sockpuppets
Comments

Four years ago user Sheilub, a confirmed sock puppet of Buenos Aires-based AndresHerutJaim, attributed various unsolved attacks under "Hezbollah" category (see: [53] [54] [55] [56] [57]), and in past few days he is trying to restore the same category back. All IPs are Buenos Aires-based and modus operandi regarding Israel-related articles is the same. His disrupting activity did not stop in late 2015 as suggested on an investigation page, meanwhile he has used other socks like AmirSurfLera which are already blocked for abusing multiple accounts/IPs, and such IPs (181.103.223.13) are again Buenos Aires-based. -- 2A01:5EC0:8:B95C:652F:F885:BFEE:8301 ( talk) 05:46, 11 September 2017 (UTC) reply


Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This case is being reviewed by Sro23 as part of the clerk training process. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on their Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.

  • Articles have been protected, so case closed. Sro23 ( talk) 23:45, 12 September 2017 (UTC) reply

19 September 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Everything started from Talk:Ali Khamenei#Power base when Icewhiz, who had started editing the article on 17 September 2017, reverted my edit. After the discussion began, another user, with no further edits on the article, entered the story and supported Icewhiz. The user was DarkKing Rayleigh with no precedented edits on the article. The two accounts are both editing similar articles and were nearly "always there when needed" (see these edits or more specifically [58] and [59]). Further investigations into the newer account, shows that he started editing less than 2 months ago meanwhile he could do edits not expected from a newbie. Mhhossein talk 13:37, 19 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Comment by Icewhiz

I have noticed DarkKing Rayleigh acting on a number of Islamic/Islam related articles (specifically 4) - which is not "my main thing" here, though I have touched this in the past 1-2 months. Per - Interaction analyzer on Council on American–Islamic Relations, Linda Sarsour, Talk:Ali Khamenei, and Zuhdi Jasser. I responded to a Talk:Israel ECP request by him (one of several respondents) - as it was on my watchlist. And he removed an image (does not seem to be controversial) after an edit I made on University of Haifa which was unrelated to his action. I do now know why he chose to edit those articles, though some of them are obvious -

  1. Linda Sarsour was all over a number of noticeboards NPVN, RSN - which got me involved
  2. Zuhdi Jasser, I branched out to Jasser after he was brought up on Linda Sarsour, where he also edited.
  3. I got to CAIR after Sarsour, perhaps his vector was the same.
  4. Stumped by Khamenei, as this was a fairly random selection by me following work on a number of Iran related articles, and into I which I got involved after seeing well-sourced information being removed.

In any event, I am not him. Icewhiz ( talk) 14:12, 19 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Addendum - I'll note that the interaction level between Mhhossein and MehrdadFR [60], who just got blocked at AE previous to this report is larger - though I'm not planning to file a Sockpuppet investigation as they do not seem to be the same (though they are in contact via e-mail it would seem ( [61])). I also sent Mhhossein a courteous request to self-revert following a 1RR vio by him on Ali Khamenei, which he did. Icewhiz ( talk) 14:38, 19 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Addendum2 - Also it seems DarkKing Rayleigh edits quite a bit at hours I'm asleep in my usual timezone (particularly 0-4 - Icewhiz wmflabs - Time card, DarkKing Rayleigh - wmflabs - Time card), and on days on which I edit less (I do edit on Friday and Saturday - but much less than other days (I tend to be out and about, and not next to a desktop). He seems to be editing quite a bit on Friday, and not at all on Saturday). Icewhiz ( talk) 14:58, 19 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Comment by Dr. K.
  • I consider this to be a disruptive and invalid SPI that should be speedily closed. I request that the filer of this SPI be given a warning about filing frivolous SPIs in the area of ARB/PIA as a means to intimidate those who disagree with him/her. Please see also my ANI report. Dr. K. 17:42, 19 September 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Additional comment: Per the clerk's findings, that Icewhiz, the named target of this investigation, is innocent of the sock allegations leveled against him by Mhhossein, and per Mhhossein's original intent to file an SPI against me, I request that the initiator of this SPI should be strongly cautioned against such future attacks against established good-faith editors. Dr. K. 19:26, 19 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  On hold - a first glance at contribs shows behaviour worth investigating. Leaving this note so that this isn't closed prematurely. Please feel free to add additional evidence/comments while this case remains "on hold". Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 18:42, 19 September 2017 (UTC) reply
  •  Clerk declined with respect to Icewhiz. I believe they're an innocent editor caught up in this, at least as far as sockpuppetry goes, and I'm not commenting on anything else here. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 19:05, 19 September 2017 (UTC) reply
  •  Clerk endorsed - please check DarkKing Rayleigh ( talk · contribs) against socks in the archive of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Delotrooladoo, such as KWcMc10 ( talk · contribs) and Chupamus Vergus ( talk · contribs). Like previous socks in that case, DKR's first 10 edits are minor random changes, followed by immediately returning to a semiprotected article (a semiprotected template in this case) and repeating the disruption of past socks; editing interests also overlap with past cases very closely. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 19:05, 19 September 2017 (UTC) reply
  • I see PhilKnight is on the case--he just beat me to it. So this is just my two cents--yes, I agree re:DarkKing, and let's rename this quickly--it's unfortunate that IceWhiz's name now appears in the CU log. Drmies ( talk) 03:38, 20 September 2017 (UTC) reply
I agree. Since I intend not to leave a redirect here, I'll wait to close the case first. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 12:59, 20 September 2017 (UTC) reply
DarkKing Rayleigh is  Likely, bordering on  Confirmed, to be a sock of Delotrooladoo. I haven't checked Icewhiz since I fully concur with the comments above. I'll go and hand DKR a nice fresh indef now; @ Ivanvector:, would you mind shunting this over to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Delotrooladoo, please? Yunshui  雲 水 15:16, 20 September 2017 (UTC) reply
 Done. Closing this case; note that I will be deleting the redirect from the original filing for this report. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 15:22, 20 September 2017 (UTC) reply

25 October 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Noticed user trying to re-add the same disputed content a Delotrooladoo sock added to Linda Sarsour - [62] [63]. In addition, the account displays the same problems with WP:OWNnership in the same topic area as past sockpuppets. Note further intersection here: [64] [65] [66] [67] [68] [69] [70] [71]. Please check for sleepers as this sockmaster is known for creating them in the dozens. Sro23 ( talk) 18:41, 25 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I had noticed him -- but didn't feel like I could file a SPI well (have tried in the past, didn't end up well because I SUCK at filing SPIs). Glad to see that the sock's been reported. 79.66.4.79 ( talk) 19:09, 25 October 2017 (UTC) reply

And who you might be?-- Shrike ( talk) 21:46, 25 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

No apparent sleepers found after looking through many IPs and he is doing a good deal of IP socking through ranges that are not practical to block.
 —  Berean Hunter (talk) 15:06, 28 October 2017 (UTC) reply

  • Thanks for the check - closing. GAB gab 15:52, 28 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/AndresHerutJaim/Archive/2&oldid=1181451040"
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



AndresHerutJaim

AndresHerutJaim ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:

18 December 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

See below. Bbb23 ( talk) 23:15, 18 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

@ Bbb23: account "IWeaponsv" is not registered, it appears red in the list above. Just checking that's not a typo on your part. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 17:09, 21 December 2016 (UTC) reply
@ Ivanvector: Typo and now fixed. Thanks for catching it.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 18:07, 21 December 2016 (UTC) reply

19 December 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Duck: sole edit so far was a crabby revert to Palestinian women, 5 minutes after referenced content was re-added [1], identical to those of blocked sock User:Perverticecream a month ago: [2], [3] Wikishovel ( talk) 07:49, 19 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

01 January 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

User made 500 dummy edits to their userspace in order to be extended confirmed to edit United Nations Security Council Resolution 2334. This is the same tactic sock User:Fexlajahd used in order to edit other Palestine-Israel articles. Aside from that, there's also intersection at the Palestinian women article: [4] [5] [6] Sro23 ( talk) 16:42, 1 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

11 January 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Look, it's another sockpuppet who made 500 dummy edits to their userspace in order to gain extended confirmed access and immediately start disrupting Palestine-Israel articles, just like past socks User:Fexlajahd and User:Annestorm. They also seem to have a problem grasping WP:CV just like Annestorm as evidenced by their edits on Palestinians. CU is needed because every time a huge amount of sleepers are discovered. Sro23 ( talk) 02:09, 11 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Looks like User:Delotrooladoo is back at it again. The user makes unwarranted edits at Palestinian articles, Jewish articles and in the below examples, articles about people of Jewish descent who are Armenian Genocide deniers. The user doesn't stop (master user was blocked on the 18th of December 2016) and even uses IPs to carry on.

This edit was recently made by a new SPA sock called User:Oo Eddie oO.

This edit was formerly made on the 5th of December 2016 by Delotrooladoo's confirmed sock User:Angelsi 1989 here, and repeated by sockpuppet IPs during the rest of the month here, here and here. See also this one here. All of those edits were made at Bernard Lewis; notice the similarities and chronological continuity.

The blocked sockpuppet User:Angelsi 1989 also made similar edits at Guenter Lewy - here and here.

It seems that this particular user only likes to focus on articles related to Jewish and Palestinian people. He even makes it clear here, on his own unblock request.

Please therefore add:

-- 92slim ( talk) 08:27, 11 January 2017 (UTC) reply

@ 92slim: What is this nonsense, do you accuse me or is it just an argument to ban me from editing?. I'm editing articles relating to Palestinians but not Jews, if you think the Palestinians are Jews, you are wrong. All that you said is wrong or justified to block me on Wikipedia.
@ Euryalus: Look at this nonsense from user 92slim, and can you explain to the user Sro23 about (made 500 dummy edits).-- Marlo Jonesa ( talk) 09:32, 11 January 2017 (UTC) reply
You made 500 dummy edits in order to become autoconfirmed. This may or may not have been in good faith; unfortunately it's exactly the same tactic used by socks of Delotrooladoo, and it is referenced here as part of the suggestion that you are the same user. The presentation of this kind of evidence is standard at SPIs. If you are not user:Delotrooladoo and this similarity is a coincidence, then that will no doubt be apparent in an analysis of the rest of your edits. -- Euryalus ( talk) 10:39, 11 January 2017 (UTC) reply
@ Marlo Jonesa: I'm not the one accusing you, that was User:Sro23. Perhaps read carefully what the accusations are before writing nonsense yourself. -- 92slim ( talk) 09:35, 11 January 2017 (UTC) reply
As you say: by sockpuppet IPs during the rest of the month here, here and here. See also this one here. from this IP 186.137.232.97 from Argentina and I'm from Zurich, Switzerland!!.-- Marlo Jonesa ( talk) 09:58, 11 January 2017 (UTC) reply
@ Marlo Jonesa: Have you even read the page you're in? It's Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Delotrooladoo. As I said, I'm not the one accusing you, that was User:Sro23. You happen to not understand anything I write. Please read who's accusing who and for what. -- 92slim ( talk) 10:15, 11 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Marlo Jonesa is Red X Unrelated. Oo Eddie oO is  Confirmed, blocked and tagged.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 15:24, 11 January 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Closing. IPs are weeks old, so no action to be taken at the moment. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:09, 12 January 2017 (UTC) reply

21 February 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

See findings below. Bbb23 ( talk) 15:26, 21 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

I would like to draw your attention to this recently created Sstella12 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki) which has the same edits as Bamboozled_Shaare. -- Hyperzion ( talk) 20:19, 21 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

09 March 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

See below. Bbb23 ( talk) 22:02, 9 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


10 March 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

New account, immediately reinstates sockpuppet's edits. [7] [8] [9] [10] Sro23 ( talk) 03:06, 10 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  Looks like a duck to me. GAB gab 14:12, 10 March 2017 (UTC) reply
I agree. Blocked without tags. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 14:46, 10 March 2017 (UTC) reply
On second thought, tagged, per previous cases. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 14:49, 10 March 2017 (UTC) reply

20 March 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Fream Yogur: Intersection with User:Angelsi 1989. [11] [12]. As for the rest, they all demonstrate WP:OWN problems, WP:GAME (see how the Oxbird became autoconfirmed through User:Oxbird/sandbox) and high overlap mainly with the sock User:Iphone4 hateparents. [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] Sro23 ( talk) 00:01, 20 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

22 March 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

restoring sock User:Oxbird's edits ( [19] [20] [21] [22]) Sro23 ( talk) 01:03, 22 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

09 April 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

See WP:OWN and intersection with past sock on Mohammad Khaleel Jamjoum. [23] [24] The username is supposed to be mocking the user with whom they are in dispute with. They done this before, for example User:Yh98a. Sro23 ( talk) 17:51, 9 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


14 April 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Like almost all other socks, made a single edit almost immediately after registration (in this case, registered at 02:34 with first edit at 02:35), concerned with POV-pushing on topics pertaining to Geert Wilders/description of his ideology, as well as Islamophobia. For previous socks' activity on these topics, see [25] [26] [27] for examples of previous activity within this area. See also: previous case report of 22 March. Mélencron ( talk) 05:10, 14 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


21 April 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

  Looks like a duck to me: [28] [29]. CU may be necessary for sleepers, but one was just conducted, so... GAB gab 01:20, 21 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I've added a few more WP:DUCKs. Sro23 ( talk) 01:25, 21 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Please block the sock. Thanks, GAB gab 01:21, 21 April 2017 (UTC) reply

 Clerk note: Indeffing w/o tags and closing.
 —  Berean Hunter (talk) 07:29, 21 April 2017 (UTC) reply

29 May 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Same kind of SPA account in the same kind of topic area - [30] [31] - same methods of achieving autoconfirmed status: [32]. Sro23 ( talk) 01:06, 29 May 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

10 July 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Delotrooladoo keeps returning to the same topics with the same point of view and ownership. Operation Ezra and Nehemiah: [33] [34], Jeremy Corbyn: [35] [36], Jews: [37] [38], Linda Sarsour: [39] [40], as well as the dummy edits this sockmaster is known for: [41] [42]. Requested CU to see if additional accounts may be found. Sro23 ( talk) 03:23, 10 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

13 July 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Noticed this new user restoring what User:ZhengaryChen did. [43] [44] [45] [46] Sro23 ( talk) 01:32, 13 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

14 July 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Making edits in same subject area persistently, swapping IP addresses. 331dot ( talk) 17:27, 14 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Additional information needed - @ 331dot: In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
  1. At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
  2. At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
  3. In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:35, 14 July 2017 (UTC) reply
I was mostly relying on what Doug Weller said here. However looking at a few of the edits made by established socks of this user, the attitude seems consistent. The attitude of the IP users seem consistent with that named user as well. 331dot ( talk) 17:42, 14 July 2017 (UTC) reply
We don't normally comment on IPs. However, if this is a sock, I suspect blocking wouldn't help as they'd just get another IP address, so I've semi-protected the article for 2 weeks. Doug Weller talk 18:08, 14 July 2017 (UTC) reply
I was not aware of the correct procedure here, and I apologize. 331dot ( talk) 18:11, 14 July 2017 (UTC) reply

21 July 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Fits the pattern of making 10 minor edits and then once autoconfirmed, immediately returning to articles Delotrooladoo can't seem to leave alone. [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] CU requested to look for additional accounts. Sro23 ( talk) 01:44, 21 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

11 September 2017

Suspected sockpuppets
Comments

Four years ago user Sheilub, a confirmed sock puppet of Buenos Aires-based AndresHerutJaim, attributed various unsolved attacks under "Hezbollah" category (see: [53] [54] [55] [56] [57]), and in past few days he is trying to restore the same category back. All IPs are Buenos Aires-based and modus operandi regarding Israel-related articles is the same. His disrupting activity did not stop in late 2015 as suggested on an investigation page, meanwhile he has used other socks like AmirSurfLera which are already blocked for abusing multiple accounts/IPs, and such IPs (181.103.223.13) are again Buenos Aires-based. -- 2A01:5EC0:8:B95C:652F:F885:BFEE:8301 ( talk) 05:46, 11 September 2017 (UTC) reply


Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This case is being reviewed by Sro23 as part of the clerk training process. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on their Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.

  • Articles have been protected, so case closed. Sro23 ( talk) 23:45, 12 September 2017 (UTC) reply

19 September 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Everything started from Talk:Ali Khamenei#Power base when Icewhiz, who had started editing the article on 17 September 2017, reverted my edit. After the discussion began, another user, with no further edits on the article, entered the story and supported Icewhiz. The user was DarkKing Rayleigh with no precedented edits on the article. The two accounts are both editing similar articles and were nearly "always there when needed" (see these edits or more specifically [58] and [59]). Further investigations into the newer account, shows that he started editing less than 2 months ago meanwhile he could do edits not expected from a newbie. Mhhossein talk 13:37, 19 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Comment by Icewhiz

I have noticed DarkKing Rayleigh acting on a number of Islamic/Islam related articles (specifically 4) - which is not "my main thing" here, though I have touched this in the past 1-2 months. Per - Interaction analyzer on Council on American–Islamic Relations, Linda Sarsour, Talk:Ali Khamenei, and Zuhdi Jasser. I responded to a Talk:Israel ECP request by him (one of several respondents) - as it was on my watchlist. And he removed an image (does not seem to be controversial) after an edit I made on University of Haifa which was unrelated to his action. I do now know why he chose to edit those articles, though some of them are obvious -

  1. Linda Sarsour was all over a number of noticeboards NPVN, RSN - which got me involved
  2. Zuhdi Jasser, I branched out to Jasser after he was brought up on Linda Sarsour, where he also edited.
  3. I got to CAIR after Sarsour, perhaps his vector was the same.
  4. Stumped by Khamenei, as this was a fairly random selection by me following work on a number of Iran related articles, and into I which I got involved after seeing well-sourced information being removed.

In any event, I am not him. Icewhiz ( talk) 14:12, 19 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Addendum - I'll note that the interaction level between Mhhossein and MehrdadFR [60], who just got blocked at AE previous to this report is larger - though I'm not planning to file a Sockpuppet investigation as they do not seem to be the same (though they are in contact via e-mail it would seem ( [61])). I also sent Mhhossein a courteous request to self-revert following a 1RR vio by him on Ali Khamenei, which he did. Icewhiz ( talk) 14:38, 19 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Addendum2 - Also it seems DarkKing Rayleigh edits quite a bit at hours I'm asleep in my usual timezone (particularly 0-4 - Icewhiz wmflabs - Time card, DarkKing Rayleigh - wmflabs - Time card), and on days on which I edit less (I do edit on Friday and Saturday - but much less than other days (I tend to be out and about, and not next to a desktop). He seems to be editing quite a bit on Friday, and not at all on Saturday). Icewhiz ( talk) 14:58, 19 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Comment by Dr. K.
  • I consider this to be a disruptive and invalid SPI that should be speedily closed. I request that the filer of this SPI be given a warning about filing frivolous SPIs in the area of ARB/PIA as a means to intimidate those who disagree with him/her. Please see also my ANI report. Dr. K. 17:42, 19 September 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Additional comment: Per the clerk's findings, that Icewhiz, the named target of this investigation, is innocent of the sock allegations leveled against him by Mhhossein, and per Mhhossein's original intent to file an SPI against me, I request that the initiator of this SPI should be strongly cautioned against such future attacks against established good-faith editors. Dr. K. 19:26, 19 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  On hold - a first glance at contribs shows behaviour worth investigating. Leaving this note so that this isn't closed prematurely. Please feel free to add additional evidence/comments while this case remains "on hold". Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 18:42, 19 September 2017 (UTC) reply
  •  Clerk declined with respect to Icewhiz. I believe they're an innocent editor caught up in this, at least as far as sockpuppetry goes, and I'm not commenting on anything else here. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 19:05, 19 September 2017 (UTC) reply
  •  Clerk endorsed - please check DarkKing Rayleigh ( talk · contribs) against socks in the archive of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Delotrooladoo, such as KWcMc10 ( talk · contribs) and Chupamus Vergus ( talk · contribs). Like previous socks in that case, DKR's first 10 edits are minor random changes, followed by immediately returning to a semiprotected article (a semiprotected template in this case) and repeating the disruption of past socks; editing interests also overlap with past cases very closely. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 19:05, 19 September 2017 (UTC) reply
  • I see PhilKnight is on the case--he just beat me to it. So this is just my two cents--yes, I agree re:DarkKing, and let's rename this quickly--it's unfortunate that IceWhiz's name now appears in the CU log. Drmies ( talk) 03:38, 20 September 2017 (UTC) reply
I agree. Since I intend not to leave a redirect here, I'll wait to close the case first. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 12:59, 20 September 2017 (UTC) reply
DarkKing Rayleigh is  Likely, bordering on  Confirmed, to be a sock of Delotrooladoo. I haven't checked Icewhiz since I fully concur with the comments above. I'll go and hand DKR a nice fresh indef now; @ Ivanvector:, would you mind shunting this over to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Delotrooladoo, please? Yunshui  雲 水 15:16, 20 September 2017 (UTC) reply
 Done. Closing this case; note that I will be deleting the redirect from the original filing for this report. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 15:22, 20 September 2017 (UTC) reply

25 October 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Noticed user trying to re-add the same disputed content a Delotrooladoo sock added to Linda Sarsour - [62] [63]. In addition, the account displays the same problems with WP:OWNnership in the same topic area as past sockpuppets. Note further intersection here: [64] [65] [66] [67] [68] [69] [70] [71]. Please check for sleepers as this sockmaster is known for creating them in the dozens. Sro23 ( talk) 18:41, 25 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I had noticed him -- but didn't feel like I could file a SPI well (have tried in the past, didn't end up well because I SUCK at filing SPIs). Glad to see that the sock's been reported. 79.66.4.79 ( talk) 19:09, 25 October 2017 (UTC) reply

And who you might be?-- Shrike ( talk) 21:46, 25 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

No apparent sleepers found after looking through many IPs and he is doing a good deal of IP socking through ranges that are not practical to block.
 —  Berean Hunter (talk) 15:06, 28 October 2017 (UTC) reply

  • Thanks for the check - closing. GAB gab 15:52, 28 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/AndresHerutJaim/Archive/2&oldid=1181451040"

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook




Top Of Page

Home • Search • Translate

© CSE