What is this dispute about? What sections, sentences, or issues in the article(s) can you not agree on? If you are the editor who opened this request, list these issues to be mediated under "Primary issues". If you did not open this request, you can add additional issues to be mediated under "Additional issues". The issues to be mediated would be properly agreed upon later, if this request for mediation is accepted.
Primary issues (added by the filing party)
Should the infobox be condensed?
What information should be included in the 'status' section of the infobox?
Additional issues (added by other parties)
Additional issue 1
Additional issue 2
Parties' agreement to mediation
If you are a named party, please sign below and indicate whether you agree or refuse to participate in mediation. Remember that all editors are obliged to resolve disputes about content through discussion, mediation, or other similar means. If you do not wish to participate in mediation, you must arrange another form of dispute resolution. Comments and questions should be made underneath the numbered list below, to avoid confusion.
This section should only be edited by a mediator. The Mediation Committee's representative will indicate in due course whether the request is
accepted (meaning a mediator will be assigned) or
rejected (meaning you will have to try a different type of dispute resolution). If the mediator asks you a question in this section, you may edit here.
Reject. Fails to meet
prerequisite for mediation #8, "No related dispute resolution proceedings are active in other Wikipedia forums." A
request for comments is pending on the article talk page. A RfC is considered a
dispute resolution proceeding. This request may be refiled if the RfC is closed without resolving the dispute. For the Mediation Committee,
TransporterMan (
TALK) 02:33, 26 December 2014 (UTC) (chairperson)reply
What is this dispute about? What sections, sentences, or issues in the article(s) can you not agree on? If you are the editor who opened this request, list these issues to be mediated under "Primary issues". If you did not open this request, you can add additional issues to be mediated under "Additional issues". The issues to be mediated would be properly agreed upon later, if this request for mediation is accepted.
Primary issues (added by the filing party)
Should the infobox be condensed?
What information should be included in the 'status' section of the infobox?
Additional issues (added by other parties)
Additional issue 1
Additional issue 2
Parties' agreement to mediation
If you are a named party, please sign below and indicate whether you agree or refuse to participate in mediation. Remember that all editors are obliged to resolve disputes about content through discussion, mediation, or other similar means. If you do not wish to participate in mediation, you must arrange another form of dispute resolution. Comments and questions should be made underneath the numbered list below, to avoid confusion.
This section should only be edited by a mediator. The Mediation Committee's representative will indicate in due course whether the request is
accepted (meaning a mediator will be assigned) or
rejected (meaning you will have to try a different type of dispute resolution). If the mediator asks you a question in this section, you may edit here.
Reject. Fails to meet
prerequisite for mediation #8, "No related dispute resolution proceedings are active in other Wikipedia forums." A
request for comments is pending on the article talk page. A RfC is considered a
dispute resolution proceeding. This request may be refiled if the RfC is closed without resolving the dispute. For the Mediation Committee,
TransporterMan (
TALK) 02:33, 26 December 2014 (UTC) (chairperson)reply