If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Kashmircloud}} to the checkuser page
here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on
Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Supporting evidence:Kashmircloud (
talk·contribs) and the other listed accounts were blocked as per
Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Kashmircloud. Kashmircloud now claims that he/she has been wrongfully blocked. I think a check can shed some confusions, as there are some additional canvassing sock cases not fully resolved. Kashmircloud has given consent to checkuser,
[1]. --
Soman (
talk) 19:30, 7 September 2008 (UTC)reply
Careful here. The following are Confirmed sock-puppets of the one editor;
Clerk note: The one account that was not yet blocked has now been.
Tiptoetytalk 01:23, 9 September 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Kashmircloud}} to the checkuser page
here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on
Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Supporting evidence:Kashmircloud (
talk·contribs) and the other listed accounts were blocked as per
Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Kashmircloud. Kashmircloud now claims that he/she has been wrongfully blocked. I think a check can shed some confusions, as there are some additional canvassing sock cases not fully resolved. Kashmircloud has given consent to checkuser,
[1]. --
Soman (
talk) 19:30, 7 September 2008 (UTC)reply
Careful here. The following are Confirmed sock-puppets of the one editor;
Clerk note: The one account that was not yet blocked has now been.
Tiptoetytalk 01:23, 9 September 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.