Final (71/10/4); ended 15:11, 14 September 2011 (UTC) Maxim (talk) 15:11, 14 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Rannpháirtí anaithnid ( talk · contribs)
This is my second request (and first self-nomination) having been unsuccessfully nominated in 2007. That request failed largely due to a lapse of judgement on my part to do with handling a hoaxer that I was familiar with.
It is daunting to be here again — and especially self nominating — but it has been something that has been at the back of my mind since being nominated in 2007. On the advice of another user, I opened a subpage of my talk inviting comments on whether I would make a good admin. Obviously, that sample is skewed but, over a year later, with some comments there being definitely 'no', it has given the courage to self nominate this time.
So, not with a little trepidation, I nominate myself for adminship.
Note: I previously edited under the user name "sony-youth" but requested the right to vanish in 2008. In 2009, I found myself editing regularly again as an IP and signed up for my current account. The former "sony-youth" account has since been moved to User:Rannpháirtí anaithnid (old).
--RA ( talk) 11:15, 7 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.
RfA/RfB toolbox for "Rannpháirtí anaithnid" account | |
---|---|
Counters | |
Analysis | |
Cross-wiki |
RfA/RfB toolbox for "sony-youth" account | |
---|---|
Counters | |
Analysis | |
Cross-wiki |
On the one hand you've less of a record in deletion-related processes than I'm normally comfortable with, but on the other you have a strong record in Ireland-related matters, which is just about as controversial an area as there is. I've got no reason to suspect that you would use the tools in an improper way, I'm satisfied that you have decent all-round experience in spite of a small XfD record, and for that reason I'm happy to support. — WFC— 16:30, 7 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Final (71/10/4); ended 15:11, 14 September 2011 (UTC) Maxim (talk) 15:11, 14 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Rannpháirtí anaithnid ( talk · contribs)
This is my second request (and first self-nomination) having been unsuccessfully nominated in 2007. That request failed largely due to a lapse of judgement on my part to do with handling a hoaxer that I was familiar with.
It is daunting to be here again — and especially self nominating — but it has been something that has been at the back of my mind since being nominated in 2007. On the advice of another user, I opened a subpage of my talk inviting comments on whether I would make a good admin. Obviously, that sample is skewed but, over a year later, with some comments there being definitely 'no', it has given the courage to self nominate this time.
So, not with a little trepidation, I nominate myself for adminship.
Note: I previously edited under the user name "sony-youth" but requested the right to vanish in 2008. In 2009, I found myself editing regularly again as an IP and signed up for my current account. The former "sony-youth" account has since been moved to User:Rannpháirtí anaithnid (old).
--RA ( talk) 11:15, 7 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.
RfA/RfB toolbox for "Rannpháirtí anaithnid" account | |
---|---|
Counters | |
Analysis | |
Cross-wiki |
RfA/RfB toolbox for "sony-youth" account | |
---|---|
Counters | |
Analysis | |
Cross-wiki |
On the one hand you've less of a record in deletion-related processes than I'm normally comfortable with, but on the other you have a strong record in Ireland-related matters, which is just about as controversial an area as there is. I've got no reason to suspect that you would use the tools in an improper way, I'm satisfied that you have decent all-round experience in spite of a small XfD record, and for that reason I'm happy to support. — WFC— 16:30, 7 September 2011 (UTC) reply