Final (8/5/2); ended 19:31, 1 August 2011 (UTC). Withdrawn by candidate. Regards So Why 19:33, 1 August 2011 (UTC) reply
My76Strat ( talk · contribs) – I am putting this nomination forward because I believe I have learned the things I needed to learn which hindered a large contingent from supporting my first nomination, and I see areas where I believe I can further benefit Wikipedia by having the extra tools. What matters most, is whether or not a consensus will emerge demonstrating that the community shares these beliefs. My76Strat ( talk) 06:49, 1 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review his contributions before commenting.
RfA/RfB toolbox | |
---|---|
Counters | |
Analysis | |
Cross-wiki |
This mess has an inexplicable semicolon splicing a mass of varied tenses and improperly used wordforms (e.g., grasps, consequence). It also uses two sentences to convey very little information (e.g., no mention of specific "enunciated ... lessons" that were adopted). When asked to rewrite the answer in short form, the meaning of this jumble of becomes clearer.And the other lessons which were enunciated by participants who expressed; I would be better situated for adminship after allowing some time to grasps the things being said. I have learned those things, and I hope to display the full consequence of what I have learned over the next seven days.
Since it is obvious that My76Strat has the full capacity to express these ideas in a form that does not obscure the meaning of the prose, I think it's clear that s/he is writing in this contrived manner for deliberate effect. I'm not asking for perfection in English, merely that effort be taken to consistently communicate with clarity. As for further examples, it is trivial to find similar writing in My76Strat's recent editing history: nearly every discussion page edit I've seen from My76Strat suffers from the same deficits. If you really want more examples, I'll take it to the talk page. — Scien tizzle 17:49, 1 August 2011 (UTC) replyI hope to demonstrate that I have bettered myself by adopting the suggestions provided by everyone who offered advice.
Final (8/5/2); ended 19:31, 1 August 2011 (UTC). Withdrawn by candidate. Regards So Why 19:33, 1 August 2011 (UTC) reply
My76Strat ( talk · contribs) – I am putting this nomination forward because I believe I have learned the things I needed to learn which hindered a large contingent from supporting my first nomination, and I see areas where I believe I can further benefit Wikipedia by having the extra tools. What matters most, is whether or not a consensus will emerge demonstrating that the community shares these beliefs. My76Strat ( talk) 06:49, 1 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review his contributions before commenting.
RfA/RfB toolbox | |
---|---|
Counters | |
Analysis | |
Cross-wiki |
This mess has an inexplicable semicolon splicing a mass of varied tenses and improperly used wordforms (e.g., grasps, consequence). It also uses two sentences to convey very little information (e.g., no mention of specific "enunciated ... lessons" that were adopted). When asked to rewrite the answer in short form, the meaning of this jumble of becomes clearer.And the other lessons which were enunciated by participants who expressed; I would be better situated for adminship after allowing some time to grasps the things being said. I have learned those things, and I hope to display the full consequence of what I have learned over the next seven days.
Since it is obvious that My76Strat has the full capacity to express these ideas in a form that does not obscure the meaning of the prose, I think it's clear that s/he is writing in this contrived manner for deliberate effect. I'm not asking for perfection in English, merely that effort be taken to consistently communicate with clarity. As for further examples, it is trivial to find similar writing in My76Strat's recent editing history: nearly every discussion page edit I've seen from My76Strat suffers from the same deficits. If you really want more examples, I'll take it to the talk page. — Scien tizzle 17:49, 1 August 2011 (UTC) replyI hope to demonstrate that I have bettered myself by adopting the suggestions provided by everyone who offered advice.