Final (85/2/4); Closed as successful by – xeno talk at 13:55, 18 February 2011 (UTC) reply
ErrantX ( talk · contribs) – I've been back with Wikipedia for a solid 9 months now, and am here for the long haul. I'm nominating myself because the admin tools would be useful to me during day-to-day activities. My personal opinion is that I could now be trusted not to blow anything up with these tools. I took the liberty of writing an extended statement below Errant ( chat!) 11:42, 11 February 2011 (UTC) reply
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
I originally joined Wikipedia back in 2006, but stopped editing after only a couple of months. I should disclose that during that time
I ran for adminship, a somewhat misguided (but good faith) idea that rightly failed. Despite being a bit naive I think I did some good work. 4 years later, with better spuelling and a little more adult/experienced I returned; ostensibly to work on
Digital forensics topics. Fortunately (or perhaps unfortunately for my family and friends...) I got dragged back into the fray proper and have been actively editing for the last nine months. My work here tends to flit between article work proper, BLP work, hanging out on AN/I and wikignoming (mostly wikification). For a while now I have felt that having access to the admin tools would be beneficial, but that I still needed a little more time. Now I am personally happy that my knowledge of policy is back up to speed and that I could use such tools without blowing anything up.
I consider adminship very much to be no big deal, and ideally loads of us would have the tools to keep the wiki clean, healthy and accurate. Hopefully the community will agree the tools would be useful to me. If not, then this should be a good process to highlight any weak areas I can work on. -- Errant ( chat!) 11:47, 11 February 2011 (UTC) reply
Account disclosures:
All above accounts are used/disclosed properly (indeed only Autoerrant is active) per our socking policy.
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review his contributions before commenting.
RfA/RfB toolbox | |
---|---|
Counters | |
Analysis | |
Cross-wiki |
Final (85/2/4); Closed as successful by – xeno talk at 13:55, 18 February 2011 (UTC) reply
ErrantX ( talk · contribs) – I've been back with Wikipedia for a solid 9 months now, and am here for the long haul. I'm nominating myself because the admin tools would be useful to me during day-to-day activities. My personal opinion is that I could now be trusted not to blow anything up with these tools. I took the liberty of writing an extended statement below Errant ( chat!) 11:42, 11 February 2011 (UTC) reply
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
I originally joined Wikipedia back in 2006, but stopped editing after only a couple of months. I should disclose that during that time
I ran for adminship, a somewhat misguided (but good faith) idea that rightly failed. Despite being a bit naive I think I did some good work. 4 years later, with better spuelling and a little more adult/experienced I returned; ostensibly to work on
Digital forensics topics. Fortunately (or perhaps unfortunately for my family and friends...) I got dragged back into the fray proper and have been actively editing for the last nine months. My work here tends to flit between article work proper, BLP work, hanging out on AN/I and wikignoming (mostly wikification). For a while now I have felt that having access to the admin tools would be beneficial, but that I still needed a little more time. Now I am personally happy that my knowledge of policy is back up to speed and that I could use such tools without blowing anything up.
I consider adminship very much to be no big deal, and ideally loads of us would have the tools to keep the wiki clean, healthy and accurate. Hopefully the community will agree the tools would be useful to me. If not, then this should be a good process to highlight any weak areas I can work on. -- Errant ( chat!) 11:47, 11 February 2011 (UTC) reply
Account disclosures:
All above accounts are used/disclosed properly (indeed only Autoerrant is active) per our socking policy.
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review his contributions before commenting.
RfA/RfB toolbox | |
---|---|
Counters | |
Analysis | |
Cross-wiki |