Piri

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to nominate this for FA, and I'd like some advice on what doesn't need to be there (i.e. extraneous stuff, unreliable sources etc). I also want some advice on timestamps; several interviews are no longer available and thus I am unable to locate timestamps for them. WP:FACR 2c demands consistent citations - should I take the existing timestamps out?

Thanks, Laun chba ller 10:43, 25 July 2023 (UTC) reply

@ Launchballer: This has been open for over a month without comment. Are you still interested in receiving reviews? If not, can this be closed? Z1720 ( talk) 00:14, 26 August 2023 (UTC) reply

I am still interested in getting this to FA, if that's what you're asking. Can you see anything in there that would get in its way? If not, feel free to close this - I think a month's long enough for someone to say something.-- Laun chba ller 00:47, 26 August 2023 (UTC) reply