- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep - bad faith nom. Non-admin closure.-- WaltCip ( talk) 15:22, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not about winning
Wikipedia is all about winning and about who comes on top. Hence. this essay is bullshit. – MuZemike 07:07, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - I disagree. Then what happened to WP:BATTLE? Jasper Deng (talk) 07:09, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- On the off-chance that this deletion request is serious and not just a platform for humour/pointed commentary, I suggest we keep the article. It seems a sufficiently worthy addition to the wikiessay genre. Colon el Tom 08:35, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - I quoted this essay only yesterday when clarifying I would not take it personally if an AfD request I submitted came back with "Keep" as a consensus. However, much more importantly, I would be able to point and laugh at the OP ... oh, maybe it is about winning after all. D'uuh. -- Ritchie333 ( talk) 10:51, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- For anyone who isn't aware of it, MuZemike enjoys making ironic proposals like this which are intended to highlight some sort of inequality or other drama. This isn't a serious nomination. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 11:16, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- That just strikes me as time wasting, and on a par with admins on other sites who block or rename users for a "laugh". -- Ritchie333 ( talk) 11:41, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- keep. Speedy keep. No valid, genuine reason offered for deletion. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 12:57, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep - bad faith nom. Non-admin closure.-- WaltCip ( talk) 15:22, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not about winning
Wikipedia is all about winning and about who comes on top. Hence. this essay is bullshit. – MuZemike 07:07, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - I disagree. Then what happened to WP:BATTLE? Jasper Deng (talk) 07:09, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- On the off-chance that this deletion request is serious and not just a platform for humour/pointed commentary, I suggest we keep the article. It seems a sufficiently worthy addition to the wikiessay genre. Colon el Tom 08:35, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - I quoted this essay only yesterday when clarifying I would not take it personally if an AfD request I submitted came back with "Keep" as a consensus. However, much more importantly, I would be able to point and laugh at the OP ... oh, maybe it is about winning after all. D'uuh. -- Ritchie333 ( talk) 10:51, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- For anyone who isn't aware of it, MuZemike enjoys making ironic proposals like this which are intended to highlight some sort of inequality or other drama. This isn't a serious nomination. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 11:16, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- That just strikes me as time wasting, and on a par with admins on other sites who block or rename users for a "laugh". -- Ritchie333 ( talk) 11:41, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- keep. Speedy keep. No valid, genuine reason offered for deletion. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 12:57, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.