- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was No consensus - people's ideas are all over the place, and there's no compelling policy reason to favour any particular outcome. Wilde as pop culture "cruft" is a new one to me. Wily D 08:30, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
User:ChildofMidnight/Mermaid problem
article previously deleted, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mermaid problem. Userfied, but no work done on it since that time, user was banned for a year but has done no editing since the apparent lifting of the ban. housekeeping to avoid google hits, etc. Mercurywoodrose ( talk) 03:29, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
- Move to article space Trim the "in pop culture" stuff and this does seem to have a few decent sources to support the content. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 04:33, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
- Comment this was to me the most interesting of all the pages listed here. I am really interested in giving these a last chance if at all conceivable. tastes around deletions do vary over time. Mercurywoodrose ( talk) 05:09, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
- (ignoring for a moment that mainspace -> AfD -> userspace -> rot -> mainspace is not a virtuous cycle) A quick examination of the article reveals that the "examples" section is 100% popcruft and of the rest, only the first three sources directly address the subject matter. So that leaves us with sentences 1, 2, 4 and 5 from the article. That's roughly enough for a paragraph on the "phenomenon" on mermaid. If folk really think that's worthwhile, this should be moved to mermaid biology or something and then speedily merged to the parent. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 13:58, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was No consensus - people's ideas are all over the place, and there's no compelling policy reason to favour any particular outcome. Wilde as pop culture "cruft" is a new one to me. Wily D 08:30, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
User:ChildofMidnight/Mermaid problem
article previously deleted, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mermaid problem. Userfied, but no work done on it since that time, user was banned for a year but has done no editing since the apparent lifting of the ban. housekeeping to avoid google hits, etc. Mercurywoodrose ( talk) 03:29, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
- Move to article space Trim the "in pop culture" stuff and this does seem to have a few decent sources to support the content. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 04:33, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
- Comment this was to me the most interesting of all the pages listed here. I am really interested in giving these a last chance if at all conceivable. tastes around deletions do vary over time. Mercurywoodrose ( talk) 05:09, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
- (ignoring for a moment that mainspace -> AfD -> userspace -> rot -> mainspace is not a virtuous cycle) A quick examination of the article reveals that the "examples" section is 100% popcruft and of the rest, only the first three sources directly address the subject matter. So that leaves us with sentences 1, 2, 4 and 5 from the article. That's roughly enough for a paragraph on the "phenomenon" on mermaid. If folk really think that's worthwhile, this should be moved to mermaid biology or something and then speedily merged to the parent. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 13:58, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.