- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗ plicit 23:42, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
User:Avazina/CREATION SCIENCE vs EVOLUTION
WP:UBCR says Wikipedia is not an appropriate place for: Propaganda, advocacy, or recruitment of any kind (commercial, political, religious, or otherwise)
and Opinion pieces, particularly on current affairs or politics
. This is inflammatory opinion on religion/politics. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 20:41, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
- Weak delete not “inflammatory” but I strongly support banning the promotion of pseudoscience on userpages Dronebogus ( talk) 23:59, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. There should be zero tolerance towards any promotion of pseudoscience, on userpages or elsewhere. — Sundostund mppria ( talk / contribs) 01:03, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: Wrong, but not offensive. People are allowed to be wrong without being thought-policed.
SmokeyJoe (
talk) 09:28, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is
not a forum for free speech. We're here for a singular purpose (to create an encyclopedia), and material that conflicts with that purpose should be removed.
Thebiguglyalien (
talk) 19:35, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
- The userbox is an appropriate declaration that the user is scientifically illiterate.
SmokeyJoe (
talk) 03:06, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
- I used to think that too, but now I just think it’s unnecessarily “asking for trouble/fishing for controversy” because you can hold dumb views like this but not insert them into the encyclopedia. Dronebogus ( talk) 12:11, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- The userbox is an appropriate declaration that the user is scientifically illiterate.
SmokeyJoe (
talk) 03:06, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is
not a forum for free speech. We're here for a singular purpose (to create an encyclopedia), and material that conflicts with that purpose should be removed.
Thebiguglyalien (
talk) 19:35, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Violation of WP:POLEMIC and WP:UBCR. Permitting pseudoscience brings the project into disrepute. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 19:35, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Promotion of pseudoscience. Curbon7 ( talk) 02:01, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: harmless
Unnecessarily (
talk) 10:51, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
- I’ve noticed you’ve been going around adding empty or vague MFD votes. It helps your case if you provide a rationale.
Dronebogus (
talk) 12:13, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- I didn't think anyone actually read them
Unnecessarily (
talk) 17:05, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
- I will endeavor to do better. I thought it was a straight vote. Unnecessarily ( talk) 17:08, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
- I didn't think anyone actually read them
Unnecessarily (
talk) 17:05, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
- I’ve noticed you’ve been going around adding empty or vague MFD votes. It helps your case if you provide a rationale.
Dronebogus (
talk) 12:13, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: This userbox gives a clear feeling of talking down to someone. - Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 15:17, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Wikipedia should have no space for the promotion of pseudoscience, including in userspace. — CX Zoom[he/him] ( let's talk • { C• X}) 12:09, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, as per other editors, pseudoscience. Robert McClenon ( talk) 17:19, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗ plicit 23:42, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
User:Avazina/CREATION SCIENCE vs EVOLUTION
WP:UBCR says Wikipedia is not an appropriate place for: Propaganda, advocacy, or recruitment of any kind (commercial, political, religious, or otherwise)
and Opinion pieces, particularly on current affairs or politics
. This is inflammatory opinion on religion/politics. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 20:41, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
- Weak delete not “inflammatory” but I strongly support banning the promotion of pseudoscience on userpages Dronebogus ( talk) 23:59, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. There should be zero tolerance towards any promotion of pseudoscience, on userpages or elsewhere. — Sundostund mppria ( talk / contribs) 01:03, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: Wrong, but not offensive. People are allowed to be wrong without being thought-policed.
SmokeyJoe (
talk) 09:28, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is
not a forum for free speech. We're here for a singular purpose (to create an encyclopedia), and material that conflicts with that purpose should be removed.
Thebiguglyalien (
talk) 19:35, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
- The userbox is an appropriate declaration that the user is scientifically illiterate.
SmokeyJoe (
talk) 03:06, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
- I used to think that too, but now I just think it’s unnecessarily “asking for trouble/fishing for controversy” because you can hold dumb views like this but not insert them into the encyclopedia. Dronebogus ( talk) 12:11, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- The userbox is an appropriate declaration that the user is scientifically illiterate.
SmokeyJoe (
talk) 03:06, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is
not a forum for free speech. We're here for a singular purpose (to create an encyclopedia), and material that conflicts with that purpose should be removed.
Thebiguglyalien (
talk) 19:35, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Violation of WP:POLEMIC and WP:UBCR. Permitting pseudoscience brings the project into disrepute. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 19:35, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Promotion of pseudoscience. Curbon7 ( talk) 02:01, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: harmless
Unnecessarily (
talk) 10:51, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
- I’ve noticed you’ve been going around adding empty or vague MFD votes. It helps your case if you provide a rationale.
Dronebogus (
talk) 12:13, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- I didn't think anyone actually read them
Unnecessarily (
talk) 17:05, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
- I will endeavor to do better. I thought it was a straight vote. Unnecessarily ( talk) 17:08, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
- I didn't think anyone actually read them
Unnecessarily (
talk) 17:05, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
- I’ve noticed you’ve been going around adding empty or vague MFD votes. It helps your case if you provide a rationale.
Dronebogus (
talk) 12:13, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: This userbox gives a clear feeling of talking down to someone. - Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 15:17, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Wikipedia should have no space for the promotion of pseudoscience, including in userspace. — CX Zoom[he/him] ( let's talk • { C• X}) 12:09, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, as per other editors, pseudoscience. Robert McClenon ( talk) 17:19, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.