The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:15, 22 April 2016 (UTC) reply

File:La scienza della laziness (The Science of Laziness) by Frank Stella, 1984, oil, enamel and alkyd paint on canvas, etched magnesium, aluminum and fiberglass, National Gallery of Art (Washington, D. C.).jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wmpearl ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fair use art photo is not the subject of sourced commentary in any of its current usages. Dated speedy was just removed on the last day. czar 00:19, 11 March 2016 (UTC) reply

I have added specific discullion of the work to the Frank Stella article. Wmpearl ( talk) 04:29, 25 March 2016 (UTC) reply

A single, unsourced sentence? It's still not the source of significant commentary such that our failure to show it would be a detriment to readers ( WP:NFCC#8). There are plenty of other examples within the article. czar 10:30, 21 April 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:03, 19 March 2016 (UTC) reply

File:Tunaphoto.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Tunakir~enwiki ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Up for deletion on Commons, where discussion should take place ( c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tunaphoto.jpg) Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 04:51, 11 March 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:03, 19 March 2016 (UTC) reply

File:Nasty uk7v.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by The Moving Finger Writes ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

There is the U.S. cover art already. This UK cover edition is no longer necessary for the American song by Janet Jackson. George Ho ( talk) 05:55, 11 March 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:03, 19 March 2016 (UTC) reply

File:Teraa Surroor poster (February 2016).jpeg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Musa Raza ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

There's already a film poster in the article's infobox. Skr15081997 ( talk) 06:55, 11 March 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete per nom. — Vensatry _(Talk) 09:53, 16 March 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:03, 19 March 2016 (UTC) reply

File:Barabati Fort Front Gate.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mak Salo ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

There is practically no difference (only a slight crop and significant downscaling) between this and the original on Commons, c:File:Barabati durga Cuttack Barabati Fort Front-2.JPG. The user uploaded it here with an incorrect license tag. An F8 was declined because the crop was different, but I really see no value in this image hanging around. I put the original back in the relevant article since it's higher quality. BethNaught ( talk) 08:27, 11 March 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:03, 19 March 2016 (UTC) reply

File:Odisha State Maritime Museum.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mak Salo ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

As above, see c:File:Odisha State Maritime Muesuem.JPG BethNaught ( talk) 08:31, 11 March 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:03, 19 March 2016 (UTC) reply

File:TVB2016CalendarJan.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jud82877 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Abuse of fair use criteria, use on page not that given in fair use rationale given, mainly that it is used in the infobox, and is the primary means of visual identification of the series, the actual infobox image is more inline witn the visual design of the series (so far). However what I would concede is that image is a quick, visual metaphor of the characters in the series, but this can equally conveyed in the prose character sketches. KTo288 ( talk) 08:58, 11 March 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: convert to {{ PD-US-not renewed}}. — ξ ^xplicit 04:15, 18 May 2016 (UTC) reply

File:Marie Maynard Daly.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Duckduckstop ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Listed as unfree, but how often are such yearbooks renewed? Probably PD-US-not renewed. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:34, 11 March 2016 (UTC) reply

feel free to change the license, after your copyright office search. Duckduckstop ( talk) 15:45, 11 March 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 24 April 2016 (UTC) reply

File:ScholasticNarnia.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Walter Görlitz ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

"Another consideration for "no free equivalent" are "freer" versions of non-free media, typically which include derivative works. For example, a photograph of a copyrighted 3D work of art will also carry the copyright of the photographer in addition to the copyright of the artist that created the work. We would use a photograph where the photographer has licensed their photograph under a free license, retaining the copyright of the derivative work, instead of a photograph that has non-free licenses for both the photograph and work of art."

This photo of a book collection box has not been released under a free license. The photograph is a work with a separate copyright because it contains originality in terms of the choice of viewpoint, lighting, framing and arrangement ( the threshold of originality of photographs is considerably low). Anyone having access to a box set can take a photograph and release it under a free license. –  Finnusertop ( talk ⋅ contribs) 16:26, 11 March 2016 (UTC) reply

The cover that replaced it is both ambiguous, as was shown from the talk page of the file, and no more or less of a copyright violation. I would argue it is less of a violation as it would be harder to reproduce the box cover by the lower resolution image. It also represents the collection by showing the spines of all seven books, under FUR, while the cover of the set simply represents the copyrighted illustration more clearly. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 16:45, 11 March 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:03, 19 March 2016 (UTC) reply

File:Wienerschnitzel logo.svg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Koman90 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The image that exists on Commons under this title appears to be the correct logo based on checking the website, and the current logo is shadowing the Commons file. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 20:09, 11 March 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 12 May 2016 (UTC) reply

File:White House cemetery entrance stone.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Redvers ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This looks like a lower resolution copy of commons:File:White House cemetery entrance stone.jpg which is being shadowed by the local copy. It's tagged as {{ Keep local}} though, not sure why? Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 20:14, 11 March 2016 (UTC) reply

•  Comment: Keep as is, or delete and not replace with the Commons file, thats the call for local admins, the keep local is a pointy request of the original uploader/author. As seen in the file history. Although the license is cc, I would consider this a Wikipedia only donation; and such requests should be honoured in order to keep the goodwill of current and potential donators of media.-- KTo288 ( talk) 08:16, 22 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Intrestingly the current Commons file, of the same name, isn't the Wikipedia one. It appears the same author also uploaded a very similar file to Flikr and the Commons file is an import from Flickr not Wikipedia. I'm not sure exactly what the point the author was trying to make, but how about replacing with a file from a totally different author.-- KTo288 ( talk) 08:54, 22 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Interesting. I don't think replacing the (which one?) file is the way to go, though. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:28, 22 March 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Insufficient information for any action. — ξ ^xplicit 04:15, 18 May 2016 (UTC) reply

File:JovanMarinovic.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Andrijapfc ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The person died in 1893, so the copyright tag is probably wrong. Most likely PD for one reason or another. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:35, 11 March 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:03, 19 March 2016 (UTC) reply

File:EIIR-GGs.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Miesianiacal ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCC#9. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:37, 11 March 2016 (UTC) reply

• One also wonders if WP:NFCC#1 is met - are these meetings always wholly private? Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 20:54, 11 March 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 14 March 2016 (UTC) reply

File:Coldplay - A Sky Full of Stars (Official music video screenshot).jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by FilBenLeafBoy ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails wP:NFCC#8 as well as WP:NFCC#3b, no contextual significance and removal is not detrimental to reader's understanding. — IB ^{[ Poke ]} 21:03, 11 March 2016 (UTC) reply
Ok the image could be deleted or if it's ok for Wikipedia's criteria a low resolution version could replace it. ^{(^_^)FilBenLeafBoy(^_^)}( Let's TALK!) 22:21, 11 March 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Renamed to unshadow Commons file.( non-admin closure) Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 16:12, 12 March 2016 (UTC) reply

File:Uroš Krek.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dr. Blofeld ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

If this file and the person on commons:Category:Uroš Krek are the same, this image probably is replaceable with one of them (such as commons:File:Uroš Krek.jpg) and thus fails WP:NFCC#1. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:32, 11 March 2016 (UTC) reply

These are two different people. The person on Commons is connected with the Slovenian Army, while the person whose photo is listed here was a composer. This person died in 2008. The person whose photos are in the Commons category was still living in 2010. Three of the photos in the category are dated 2010. The composer's photo has been renamed by me. We hope ( talk) 16:06, 12 March 2016 (UTC) reply

OK, with this in mind I'll retract the request. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 16:12, 12 March 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: remove all but one czar 02:47, 20 March 2016 (UTC) reply

File:The Wiggles album cover.jpg ( album cover.jpg%5D%5D delete | talk | history | links | album cover.jpg logs) – uploaded by Dcelano ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC#8, except in The Wiggles (album). Stefan2 ( talk) 22:03, 11 March 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:03, 19 March 2016 (UTC) reply

File:Kiteskiing.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Steveshapson ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unused, too low quality to be useful. Stefan2 ( talk) 23:40, 11 March 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:03, 19 March 2016 (UTC) reply

File:Mine.JPG ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by FLJuJitsu ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Low quality, unused, doesn't look useful. Stefan2 ( talk) 23:56, 11 March 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.