February 15
File:USSF women logo.svg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Remove from 2012 United States Women's National Soccer Team. Since this file was already replaced in United States women's national soccer team by a free alternative ( WP:NFCC#1), this file is currently orphaned. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 ( talk) 21:50, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- File:USSF women logo.svg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jhortman ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Non-free image being used in United States women's national soccer team and 2012 United States Women's National Soccer Team; file was also being used in United States women's national under-17 soccer team, but I removed it per WP:NFCC#10c and No. 17 of WP:NFC#UUI. File has non-free use rationales for the team's main article and the 2012 season article, but I don't think the usage in the latter satisfies WP:NFCC#8 or Nos. 14 and 17 or WP:NFC#UUI. The image is also almost identical to File:US Soccer Federation.svg, with the only difference between the two being the three stars added to the women's logo. I believe the stars represent the three women's world cups won by the team, but I am not sure. My concern is whether this difference is sufficient enough for the women's logo to not be considered a derivative of the logo used by the United States Soccer Federation. If it is a derivative, then I don't think usage in "United States women's national soccer team" complies with WP:NFCC per No. 17 of WP:NFC#UUI and WP:NFCC#3. If it is not a derivative, I think keep for the women's national team, but remove from "2012 United Women's National Soccer Team" (the team won it's third world cup in 2015 so in 2012 there would've been only two stars (if that's what they stand for)) and also remove from any other youth teams or season articles, etc. per nos. 14 and 17 of WP:NFC#UUI. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 01:32, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Your assumption about the meaning of the stars above the crest is correct; they stand for World Cup championships. As such, the USSF logo for the women's team is necessarily different from general logo of the organization, which is
File:US Soccer Federation.svg. The general logo is also used for the men's team, as they have won no World Cup championships. If they had, the men's logo would also include the appropriate number of stars above the general organization's logo. See an analogous example in the logos for
Germany national football team and
Germany women's national football team. As such, I'd recommend a keep for
United States women's national soccer team. The page for the U-17 women's team should use the general USSF logo, and if a version of the logo with 2 stars is not available on Wikipedia, then the page for the 2012 USWNT team should use the general logo, as well.-
Jhortman (
talk) 18:34, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The usage of File:US Soccer Federation.svg was previously discussed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 February 6#File:US Soccer Federation.svg and the close was that non-free usage is only appropriate for United States Soccer Federation, so I don't think that using the logo in the other women's team articles is going to be considered acceptable. In previous NFCR/ FFD discussions, the usage of non-free logos such as these has almost always only considered to be NFCC compliant in the articles about the main federation/association, regardless of whether the individual teams use the same logo. This is because No. 17 of WP:NFC#UUI reads that usage in articles about parent entities is allowed, but the usage of the same logo is not allowed in articles about child entities in attempt to keep non-free usage minimal per WP:NFCC#3. Anyway, the thing that needs to be determined is whether the three stars added to the women's logo represent a significant enough difference from the federation's logo, so that the former is not considered to be a derivative of the latter. I think it might be different enough, but others may feel it's not. As for the usage of the logos in the German team articles, the way non-free content is being used in one particular instance does not necessarily mean all similar usages in other articles is NFCC compliant as well, much like trying to argue other stuff exists in Afd discussions. At first glance, the usage of the German team logo also seems questionable, so it's probably something that should also be discussed in another FFD thread. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 22:04, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: File has been replaced in United States women's national soccer team with a newer version of the United States Soccer Federation's badge updated to Commons. Since a free-equivalent which serves the same encyclopedic purpose now seems available and assuming the licensing on the Commons' file is correct, there is now no need for this non-free file per WP:NFCC#1 in any article, unless possibly it is itself the subject of sourced commentary as a former logo. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 21:24, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- For the record, the file that Marchjuly is referring to above is File:Crest of the United States women's national soccer team.png. Steel1943 ( talk) 21:46, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Butler B Wordmark.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:Butler B Wordmark.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bsuorangecrush ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Orphaned PD; File:Butler Bulldogs wordmark.png (main wordmark) has replaced this file in all articles 🇺🇸 Corkythe hornetfan 🇺🇸 01:48, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Hartford Hawks wordmark.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:Hartford Hawks wordmark.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bsuorangecrush ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Orphaned PD image. 🇺🇸 Corkythe hornetfan 🇺🇸 01:50, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Austin Peay Wordmark.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:Austin Peay Wordmark.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bsuorangecrush ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Orphaned PD image 🇺🇸 Corkythe hornetfan 🇺🇸 01:54, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Austin Peay Governors Wordmark.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:Austin Peay Governors Wordmark.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bsuorangecrush ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Orphaned PD image. 🇺🇸 Corkythe hornetfan 🇺🇸 01:55, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:MMPR 2010 New Logo.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: remove from Mighty Morphin' Power Rangers. — ξ xplicit 04:47, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:MMPR 2010 New Logo.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Aidepikiw0000 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Non-free logo being used in Mighty Morphin' Power Rangers and Mighty Morphin Power Rangers (re-version). File has a non-free use rationale for "Mighty Morphin' Powwer Rangers", but does not have one for "Mighty Morphin Power Rangers (re-version)". If the file's description is correct, then it appears that this logo is for the 2010 rebroadcasting of the original series; therefore, it seems more appropriate for the re-version's article than the original's article. So, suggest remove from "Mighty Morphin' Power Rangers" and keep in "Mighty Morphin Power Rangers (re-version)" on the condition that there are not other NFCC problems for usage in the latter other than fixing WP:NFCC#10c. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 02:47, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Update a non-free use rationale was added for "Mighty Morphin Power Rangers (re-version)" with
this edit so there are no more
WP:NFCC#10c issues, but the non-free usage in "Mighty Morphin Power Rangers" still does not seem appropriate. --
Marchjuly (
talk) 06:36, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- A minor note to take in consideration. The original article entitled "Mighty Morphin' Power Rangers" is in fact the main article for both the original airings (season 1, season 2 and season 3) and the re-version airings. The "Mighty Morphin Power Rangers (re-version)" page is merely the list of episodes page for the Mighty Morphin re-version, much in the same way "Mighty Morphin Power Rangers (season 1)", "Mighty Morphin Power Rangers (season 2)" and "Mighty Morphin Power Rangers (season 3)" pages are list of episodes pages for Mighty Morphin season 1, Mighty Morphin season 2, and Mighty Morphin season 3 respectively. Therefore, if it had to be in only one article, it seems like the updated 2010 logo would make more sense in the main "Mighty Morphin Power Rangers" article to compare to the original 1993-1995 logo, much in the same way the original season 1 and "super" season 2 logos are used in the "Power Rangers Samurai", "Power Ranger Megaforce", and "Power Rangers Dino Charge" articles. 74.83.112.14 ( talk) 07:34, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:USC Upstate Spartans Wordmark.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:USC Upstate Spartans Wordmark.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bsuorangecrush ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Orphaned; PNG version now on Commons. 🇺🇸 Corkythe hornetfan 🇺🇸 02:48, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Seattle Redhawks Athletics.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:Seattle Redhawks Athletics.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bsuorangecrush ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Orphaned; PNG version on Commons --- replaced this image in all articles. 🇺🇸 Corkythe hornetfan 🇺🇸 03:01, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Non-free former logos of WGEE (FM)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: convert File:WOZZ Logo.gif to {{ PD-logo}}. — ξ xplicit 04:47, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:WOZZ Logo.gif ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nwa757 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
- File:WRQE Logo.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nwa757 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
Non-free former logos being used in WGEE (FM)#History. Each file has a non-free use rationale for its respective usage, but I believe each usage fails WP:NFCC#8: Neither logo itself is the subject of any sourced discussion with in the article nor is being used as the primary means of identifying the station. So, I suggest remove for each from the article. The WOZZ logo, however, might be suitable for {{ PD-logo}} and {{ Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} since it seems to just be nothing more than text. If it is changed to a free license, it would no longer be subject to WP:NFCC and would not need to be removed from the article. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 04:09, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:V.League.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:V.League.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Fetx2002 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Non-free logo being used in V.League (Japan). File has a non-free use rationale for that particular usage, but I'm wondering if this is simple enough for conversion to {{ PD-logo}} or at least {{ PD-USonly}}. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 04:24, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:West Dunbs arms.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus to delete Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 07:28, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- File:West Dunbs arms.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lozleader ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
This is a carryover from WP:NFCR. I don't have an opinion, nor understanding of this issue, and I'm only bringing it here to have it resolved. The discussion from the other page will be copied below. Oiyarbepsy ( talk) 04:30, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Image of coat of arms appears to be licensed as non-free for use in West Dunbartonshire, but only a very bare bones non-free use rationale is provided. Source is simply given as "council document" and nothing about the coat of arms can be found on the Council's official website. This photo, however, from the Council's official Flick'r account does show the CoA so I'm pretty sure it is actually used. I also found two versions of the CoA online at Heraldry of the World and The Heraldry Society of Scotland and the former more resembles the one shown in the Flick'r photo. I have two questions about this usage:
- Is it acceptable per WP:NFCC#1?
- Can a combination of the Flick'r photo and the "Heraldry of the World" links be used as the source of the image if the image is OK to be uploaded as non-free?
Thanks in advance. - Marchjuly ( talk) 04:36, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Courtesy pings: @ Marchjuly:@ Masem:. Oiyarbepsy ( talk) 04:33, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Hello. As the guilty party who uploaded this file many years ago, I seem to have been pulled into the loop on this discussion. I have the blazon of the arms (textual description if you will) in Scottish Civic Heraldry 2 by R M Urquhart (published by the Scottish Library Association, 2001, ISBN 9780900649233). I'll have to locate the book: I have moved house since 2007, but it's here somewhere. Lozleader ( talk) 10:26, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Rhondda Cynon Taff arms.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus to delete Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 07:28, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- File:Rhondda Cynon Taff arms.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lozleader ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Leftover from WP:NFCR. I have no opinion on the matter. Original discussion below. Oiyarbepsy ( talk) 04:36, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Image is licensed as non-free and is being used in Rhondda Cynon Taf, but I am not sure if the amount of information provided about it is sufficient to constitute a non-free use rationale or if it should be tagged with {{ Di-no fair use rationale}}. I am also not sure if WP:NFCC#1 is satisfied. - Marchjuly ( talk) 13:31, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
- The non-template rationale is reasonably fine to prevent an immediate di deletion, but it definitely would benefit from a more accurate source bit, and fleshing the rationale out more can't hurt. --
MASEM (
t) 14:12, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you for the clarification Masem. I've tried to flesh out the nfur as best as I could, but please correct any mistakes I might have made. Still not sure if this satisfies WP:NFCC#1 though since it includes heraldry elements. Also, from this webpage it appears that this is not really the coat of arms of the borough per se, but rather the coat of arms of the borough's mayor. I'm not sure how that affects the image's use in the article or if the image would be better suited for Rhondda Cynon Taf County Borough Council. Perhaps this logo from the borough's official website should be used instead of the COA? - Marchjuly ( talk) 05:13, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Hi, I'm not sure how old this discussion is, but I just received a message as I uploaded the file many years ago. Just to reply to a comment made above: the arms were granted to and belong to the council. There are no such thing as "the arms of the mayor" (unless the particular individual is armigerous in his own right). What has happened in the last few years is that councils are increasingly retiring their armorial bearings, granted the by College of Arms, in favour of some graphic artist's squiggly "logo". They continue to be the property of the council but only used in somewhat limited ceremonial occasions. They, of course, form the centre piece of the mayoral chain of office, and I have seen a number of council websites that describe them as the "mayor's arms". However they are incorrect, although one would not expect a web designer to be familiar with the laws of arms. If one were to llook at the letters patent granting the arms, one would see that they were granted to the council itself. Anyway this all a bit obscure, but i hoope it adds a little clarity to the murk. Lozleader ( talk) 10:37, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Samsung Galaxy (esports) logos
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep File:Samsung Galaxy Pro-Game Team.png in the main infobox only and remove File:Samsung Khan.png as unopposed after almost two months. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 ( talk) 17:27, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
- File:Samsung Galaxy Pro-Game Team.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Fetx2002 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
- File:Samsung Khan.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Fetx2002 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
Non-free logos being used in Samsung Galaxy (esports). "File:Samsung Galaxy Pro-Game Team.png" is being used in the main infobox and in a gallery of logos, but only has a non-free use rationale for the infobox. "File:Samsung Khan.png" also has a non-free use rationale, but it's usage is purely decorative in a gallery of logos (See WP:NFG), so it lacks the contextual significance required by WP:NFCC#8. If these cannot be changed to public domain, I suggest for keep "Samsung Galaxy Pro-Game Team.png" in the main infobox only and remove for "Samsung Khan.png". -- Marchjuly ( talk) 05:06, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Mighty Morphin Power Rangers logo.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep in Mighty Morphin Power Rangers, remove all other instances. — ξ xplicit 04:47, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:Mighty Morphin Power Rangers logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Powergate92 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Non-free logo being used in Mighty Morphin Power Rangers, Mighty Morphin Power Rangers (season 1), Mighty Morphin Power Rangers (season 2), and Mighty Morphin Power Rangers (season 3). File has a non-free use rationale for each usage, but the usages in the individual season articles do not seem to comply with Nos. 14 and No. 17 of WP:NFC#UUI. Season specific logos are probably OK, but the logo for the show itself should not be being used. Suggest keep for "Mighty Morphin Power Rangers" and remove from the individual season articles. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 06:08, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Non-free Power Ranger logos in episode list articles
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep in main articles, remove from list articles. — ξ xplicit 04:47, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:PR Zeo logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Powergate92 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
- File:PR Turbo logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Powergate92 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
- File:PR Lost Galaxy logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Powergate92 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
- File:PR Lightspeed Rescue logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Powergate92 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
- File:PR Time Force logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Powergate92 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
- File:PR Wild Force logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Powergate92 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
- File:PR Ninja Storm logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Powergate92 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
- File:PR Dino Thunder logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Powergate92 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
- File:PR Jungle Fury logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Powergate92 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
- File:PR RPM logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Powergate92 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
- File:PR Samurai logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Powergate92 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
- File:Power Rangers Megaforce logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Powergate92 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
- File:PR S.P.D. logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Powergate92 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
- File:PRIS.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ryulong ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
- File:Super samurai.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ryulong ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
- File:PR Operation Overdrive logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ryūkotsusei ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
- File:Mystic Force logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Paulcmnt ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
- File:Power Rangers Super Megaforce logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by MarcoPolo250 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
- File:Power Rangers Dino Charge logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Strongjam ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
Non-free Power Rangers logos being used in various TV show articles and episode list article. Each usage has a non-free use rationale for each respective usage, but I only think the usages in the main articles about the shows themselves comply with WP:NFCC#8. Usage in the list article does not seem to comply with WP:NFCC#3 since the logo can be seen in the main article, and WP:NFCC#8 since the contextual significance required by WP:NFCC#8 is lacking. For reference, the usage of a similar logo in a list article was previously discussed in Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 January 27#File:Power Rangers Dino Super Charge logo.png and the result was to remove from the list article. I don't see how these are any different, so I suggest keep for the main articles and remove from the list articles. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 07:27, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: Unable to notify the uploader Ryulong because their user talk is protected and cannot be edited. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 07:27, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Sample RASD RUP & RAD.gif
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:Sample RASD RUP & RAD.gif ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Itsme01 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
This image was used in an article 9 years ago that was deleted fairly swiftly after creation, and it has been sitting around ever since. Such content should be created as a table in an article, not as a very blurry, contextless, jargon-laden GIF image. — This, that and the other (talk) 12:41, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:A Light Dependent Resistor schematic symbol.gif
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:A Light Dependent Resistor schematic symbol.gif ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Neilgravir ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 ( talk) 13:57, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Bowie-Blackstar-vinylcover.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:Bowie-Blackstar-vinylcover.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Electro Ultra 217 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8, no concrete criteria for understanding in context of the presence of a similar non-free image in the parent article. Easily replaceable by words. — IB [ Poke ] 14:21, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Nextbit Robin.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:Nextbit Robin.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ayub407 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Delete: As a non-free image of a phone which is not yet available to the public does not mean a free image could not be made, so it fails the first criteria of WP:NFCC. It only requires someone to gain access to one of these phones at a trade show or promotional event for an image to be made that could be freely licenced. ww2censor ( talk) 14:43, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Can't the copyrighted image be used until someone gain access to device to create a free licenced version of it? Ayub407 talk 15:49, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:DJKhaledICALDlx.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:DJKhaledICALDlx.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by BlaccCrab ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Redundant extra cover. Fails WP:NFCC#3a. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:00, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:JMW Turner Kenilworth Castle 1830.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: kept, changed to {{ PD-Art}}. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:51, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:JMW Turner Kenilworth Castle 1830.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by BrEdWhite ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Does this reproduction of a painting made in 1830 by an artist who died in 1851 fall under the scope of {{ PD-art}}? That is, a slavish reproduction of a work of art whose copyright has almost certainly expired. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 20:11, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The photograph of the painting doesn't seem to be copyrightable. The uploader seems to claim that the painting itself is copyrighted, though. I wonder why. Sure, if the painting was published for the first time approximately 200 years after it was painted, then it could be unfree, but this situation sounds unlikely. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 21:42, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Lotte Hotels & Resorts logo.gif
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Tagged as {{ PD-ineligible-USonly}}. The status of the image's copyright status in its originating country is currently unknown as it was not able to be definitively determined during the course of this discussion. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 ( talk) 22:08, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- File:Lotte Hotels & Resorts logo.gif ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mrhotelier ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
This fairly clearly is not copyrightable in the US - a line and text are not original enough. Would it be copyrightable in South Korea? If yes, this needs the PD-USonly tag, otherwise it should be moved to Commons. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 20:18, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Obviously not copyrightable in the United States. The South Korean copyright law seems to be similar to the Japanese copyright law, and logos like this are not copyrighted in Japan, so presumably they aren't copyrighted in South Korea either.
- There are probably thousands of mistagged textlogos on Wikipedia. Do you plan to list all of them on this page? Generally, it only seems useful to retag a mistagged logo if the logo has some foreseeable use outside the use already permitted under
WP:NFCI §2. --
Stefan2 (
talk) 21:46, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- @
Stefan2: (Offtopic) No, I don't plan to list each mistagged logo here. I am evaluating when it's appropriate to boldly change the license and when discussion is needed. One might make a point that not all these mistaggings are a problem and that I should just leave them.
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk,
contributions) 21:58, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- I come across these files all of the time, for example when searching for
WP:NFCC#9 violations. I tend to retag them (usually by uploading a cleaned up copy to Commons) if their use somehow comes in conflict with the
WP:NFCC policy (for example, because the image is used outside the article namespace), but typically ignore the file if leaving the file alone wouldn't cause any damage (all use compliant with
WP:NFCI §2) or if the only page using the image is likely to be deleted (declined AfC submission, listed as AfD or similar). --
Stefan2 (
talk) 22:06, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- For this, I commend you,
Stefan2. I don't feel confident enough to make analysis of TOO, so I just remove them when they violate NFCC#9 or NFCC#10c. I wish there was a process for this other than FFD, which I don't find ideal. Those lawyers at WMF should do something useful and devise a checklist for TOO status in Commons. –
Finnusertop (
talk ⋅
contribs) 13:26, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- I think that the main problem is that there is no fast method for converting a FUR template into a standard information template, so to save time, I only fix mistagged textlogos if it's absolutely necessary to convert the template and the logo isn't likely to be deleted as "out of scope" after an AfD closes or similar. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 21:36, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- For this, I commend you,
Stefan2. I don't feel confident enough to make analysis of TOO, so I just remove them when they violate NFCC#9 or NFCC#10c. I wish there was a process for this other than FFD, which I don't find ideal. Those lawyers at WMF should do something useful and devise a checklist for TOO status in Commons. –
Finnusertop (
talk ⋅
contribs) 13:26, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- I come across these files all of the time, for example when searching for
WP:NFCC#9 violations. I tend to retag them (usually by uploading a cleaned up copy to Commons) if their use somehow comes in conflict with the
WP:NFCC policy (for example, because the image is used outside the article namespace), but typically ignore the file if leaving the file alone wouldn't cause any damage (all use compliant with
WP:NFCI §2) or if the only page using the image is likely to be deleted (declined AfC submission, listed as AfD or similar). --
Stefan2 (
talk) 22:06, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- @
Stefan2: (Offtopic) No, I don't plan to list each mistagged logo here. I am evaluating when it's appropriate to boldly change the license and when discussion is needed. One might make a point that not all these mistaggings are a problem and that I should just leave them.
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk,
contributions) 21:58, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:NewUBClogo.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:NewUBClogo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ILCS07 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFC#UUI §17. Stefan2 ( talk) 23:02, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Bowie-Blackstar-vinylcover.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:Bowie-Blackstar-vinylcover.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Electro Ultra 217 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
The album was include the vinyl cover which it was design ith the new artwork by David Bowie after he died from liver cancer at aged of 69 Electro Ultra 217 ( talk) 23:32, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
February 15
File:USSF women logo.svg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Remove from 2012 United States Women's National Soccer Team. Since this file was already replaced in United States women's national soccer team by a free alternative ( WP:NFCC#1), this file is currently orphaned. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 ( talk) 21:50, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- File:USSF women logo.svg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jhortman ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Non-free image being used in United States women's national soccer team and 2012 United States Women's National Soccer Team; file was also being used in United States women's national under-17 soccer team, but I removed it per WP:NFCC#10c and No. 17 of WP:NFC#UUI. File has non-free use rationales for the team's main article and the 2012 season article, but I don't think the usage in the latter satisfies WP:NFCC#8 or Nos. 14 and 17 or WP:NFC#UUI. The image is also almost identical to File:US Soccer Federation.svg, with the only difference between the two being the three stars added to the women's logo. I believe the stars represent the three women's world cups won by the team, but I am not sure. My concern is whether this difference is sufficient enough for the women's logo to not be considered a derivative of the logo used by the United States Soccer Federation. If it is a derivative, then I don't think usage in "United States women's national soccer team" complies with WP:NFCC per No. 17 of WP:NFC#UUI and WP:NFCC#3. If it is not a derivative, I think keep for the women's national team, but remove from "2012 United Women's National Soccer Team" (the team won it's third world cup in 2015 so in 2012 there would've been only two stars (if that's what they stand for)) and also remove from any other youth teams or season articles, etc. per nos. 14 and 17 of WP:NFC#UUI. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 01:32, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Your assumption about the meaning of the stars above the crest is correct; they stand for World Cup championships. As such, the USSF logo for the women's team is necessarily different from general logo of the organization, which is
File:US Soccer Federation.svg. The general logo is also used for the men's team, as they have won no World Cup championships. If they had, the men's logo would also include the appropriate number of stars above the general organization's logo. See an analogous example in the logos for
Germany national football team and
Germany women's national football team. As such, I'd recommend a keep for
United States women's national soccer team. The page for the U-17 women's team should use the general USSF logo, and if a version of the logo with 2 stars is not available on Wikipedia, then the page for the 2012 USWNT team should use the general logo, as well.-
Jhortman (
talk) 18:34, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The usage of File:US Soccer Federation.svg was previously discussed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 February 6#File:US Soccer Federation.svg and the close was that non-free usage is only appropriate for United States Soccer Federation, so I don't think that using the logo in the other women's team articles is going to be considered acceptable. In previous NFCR/ FFD discussions, the usage of non-free logos such as these has almost always only considered to be NFCC compliant in the articles about the main federation/association, regardless of whether the individual teams use the same logo. This is because No. 17 of WP:NFC#UUI reads that usage in articles about parent entities is allowed, but the usage of the same logo is not allowed in articles about child entities in attempt to keep non-free usage minimal per WP:NFCC#3. Anyway, the thing that needs to be determined is whether the three stars added to the women's logo represent a significant enough difference from the federation's logo, so that the former is not considered to be a derivative of the latter. I think it might be different enough, but others may feel it's not. As for the usage of the logos in the German team articles, the way non-free content is being used in one particular instance does not necessarily mean all similar usages in other articles is NFCC compliant as well, much like trying to argue other stuff exists in Afd discussions. At first glance, the usage of the German team logo also seems questionable, so it's probably something that should also be discussed in another FFD thread. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 22:04, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: File has been replaced in United States women's national soccer team with a newer version of the United States Soccer Federation's badge updated to Commons. Since a free-equivalent which serves the same encyclopedic purpose now seems available and assuming the licensing on the Commons' file is correct, there is now no need for this non-free file per WP:NFCC#1 in any article, unless possibly it is itself the subject of sourced commentary as a former logo. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 21:24, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- For the record, the file that Marchjuly is referring to above is File:Crest of the United States women's national soccer team.png. Steel1943 ( talk) 21:46, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Butler B Wordmark.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:Butler B Wordmark.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bsuorangecrush ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Orphaned PD; File:Butler Bulldogs wordmark.png (main wordmark) has replaced this file in all articles 🇺🇸 Corkythe hornetfan 🇺🇸 01:48, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Hartford Hawks wordmark.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:Hartford Hawks wordmark.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bsuorangecrush ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Orphaned PD image. 🇺🇸 Corkythe hornetfan 🇺🇸 01:50, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Austin Peay Wordmark.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:Austin Peay Wordmark.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bsuorangecrush ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Orphaned PD image 🇺🇸 Corkythe hornetfan 🇺🇸 01:54, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Austin Peay Governors Wordmark.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:Austin Peay Governors Wordmark.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bsuorangecrush ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Orphaned PD image. 🇺🇸 Corkythe hornetfan 🇺🇸 01:55, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:MMPR 2010 New Logo.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: remove from Mighty Morphin' Power Rangers. — ξ xplicit 04:47, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:MMPR 2010 New Logo.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Aidepikiw0000 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Non-free logo being used in Mighty Morphin' Power Rangers and Mighty Morphin Power Rangers (re-version). File has a non-free use rationale for "Mighty Morphin' Powwer Rangers", but does not have one for "Mighty Morphin Power Rangers (re-version)". If the file's description is correct, then it appears that this logo is for the 2010 rebroadcasting of the original series; therefore, it seems more appropriate for the re-version's article than the original's article. So, suggest remove from "Mighty Morphin' Power Rangers" and keep in "Mighty Morphin Power Rangers (re-version)" on the condition that there are not other NFCC problems for usage in the latter other than fixing WP:NFCC#10c. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 02:47, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Update a non-free use rationale was added for "Mighty Morphin Power Rangers (re-version)" with
this edit so there are no more
WP:NFCC#10c issues, but the non-free usage in "Mighty Morphin Power Rangers" still does not seem appropriate. --
Marchjuly (
talk) 06:36, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- A minor note to take in consideration. The original article entitled "Mighty Morphin' Power Rangers" is in fact the main article for both the original airings (season 1, season 2 and season 3) and the re-version airings. The "Mighty Morphin Power Rangers (re-version)" page is merely the list of episodes page for the Mighty Morphin re-version, much in the same way "Mighty Morphin Power Rangers (season 1)", "Mighty Morphin Power Rangers (season 2)" and "Mighty Morphin Power Rangers (season 3)" pages are list of episodes pages for Mighty Morphin season 1, Mighty Morphin season 2, and Mighty Morphin season 3 respectively. Therefore, if it had to be in only one article, it seems like the updated 2010 logo would make more sense in the main "Mighty Morphin Power Rangers" article to compare to the original 1993-1995 logo, much in the same way the original season 1 and "super" season 2 logos are used in the "Power Rangers Samurai", "Power Ranger Megaforce", and "Power Rangers Dino Charge" articles. 74.83.112.14 ( talk) 07:34, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:USC Upstate Spartans Wordmark.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:USC Upstate Spartans Wordmark.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bsuorangecrush ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Orphaned; PNG version now on Commons. 🇺🇸 Corkythe hornetfan 🇺🇸 02:48, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Seattle Redhawks Athletics.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:Seattle Redhawks Athletics.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bsuorangecrush ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Orphaned; PNG version on Commons --- replaced this image in all articles. 🇺🇸 Corkythe hornetfan 🇺🇸 03:01, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Non-free former logos of WGEE (FM)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: convert File:WOZZ Logo.gif to {{ PD-logo}}. — ξ xplicit 04:47, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:WOZZ Logo.gif ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nwa757 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
- File:WRQE Logo.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nwa757 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
Non-free former logos being used in WGEE (FM)#History. Each file has a non-free use rationale for its respective usage, but I believe each usage fails WP:NFCC#8: Neither logo itself is the subject of any sourced discussion with in the article nor is being used as the primary means of identifying the station. So, I suggest remove for each from the article. The WOZZ logo, however, might be suitable for {{ PD-logo}} and {{ Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} since it seems to just be nothing more than text. If it is changed to a free license, it would no longer be subject to WP:NFCC and would not need to be removed from the article. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 04:09, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:V.League.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:V.League.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Fetx2002 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Non-free logo being used in V.League (Japan). File has a non-free use rationale for that particular usage, but I'm wondering if this is simple enough for conversion to {{ PD-logo}} or at least {{ PD-USonly}}. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 04:24, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:West Dunbs arms.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus to delete Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 07:28, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- File:West Dunbs arms.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lozleader ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
This is a carryover from WP:NFCR. I don't have an opinion, nor understanding of this issue, and I'm only bringing it here to have it resolved. The discussion from the other page will be copied below. Oiyarbepsy ( talk) 04:30, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Image of coat of arms appears to be licensed as non-free for use in West Dunbartonshire, but only a very bare bones non-free use rationale is provided. Source is simply given as "council document" and nothing about the coat of arms can be found on the Council's official website. This photo, however, from the Council's official Flick'r account does show the CoA so I'm pretty sure it is actually used. I also found two versions of the CoA online at Heraldry of the World and The Heraldry Society of Scotland and the former more resembles the one shown in the Flick'r photo. I have two questions about this usage:
- Is it acceptable per WP:NFCC#1?
- Can a combination of the Flick'r photo and the "Heraldry of the World" links be used as the source of the image if the image is OK to be uploaded as non-free?
Thanks in advance. - Marchjuly ( talk) 04:36, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Courtesy pings: @ Marchjuly:@ Masem:. Oiyarbepsy ( talk) 04:33, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Hello. As the guilty party who uploaded this file many years ago, I seem to have been pulled into the loop on this discussion. I have the blazon of the arms (textual description if you will) in Scottish Civic Heraldry 2 by R M Urquhart (published by the Scottish Library Association, 2001, ISBN 9780900649233). I'll have to locate the book: I have moved house since 2007, but it's here somewhere. Lozleader ( talk) 10:26, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Rhondda Cynon Taff arms.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus to delete Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 07:28, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- File:Rhondda Cynon Taff arms.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lozleader ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Leftover from WP:NFCR. I have no opinion on the matter. Original discussion below. Oiyarbepsy ( talk) 04:36, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Image is licensed as non-free and is being used in Rhondda Cynon Taf, but I am not sure if the amount of information provided about it is sufficient to constitute a non-free use rationale or if it should be tagged with {{ Di-no fair use rationale}}. I am also not sure if WP:NFCC#1 is satisfied. - Marchjuly ( talk) 13:31, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
- The non-template rationale is reasonably fine to prevent an immediate di deletion, but it definitely would benefit from a more accurate source bit, and fleshing the rationale out more can't hurt. --
MASEM (
t) 14:12, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you for the clarification Masem. I've tried to flesh out the nfur as best as I could, but please correct any mistakes I might have made. Still not sure if this satisfies WP:NFCC#1 though since it includes heraldry elements. Also, from this webpage it appears that this is not really the coat of arms of the borough per se, but rather the coat of arms of the borough's mayor. I'm not sure how that affects the image's use in the article or if the image would be better suited for Rhondda Cynon Taf County Borough Council. Perhaps this logo from the borough's official website should be used instead of the COA? - Marchjuly ( talk) 05:13, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Hi, I'm not sure how old this discussion is, but I just received a message as I uploaded the file many years ago. Just to reply to a comment made above: the arms were granted to and belong to the council. There are no such thing as "the arms of the mayor" (unless the particular individual is armigerous in his own right). What has happened in the last few years is that councils are increasingly retiring their armorial bearings, granted the by College of Arms, in favour of some graphic artist's squiggly "logo". They continue to be the property of the council but only used in somewhat limited ceremonial occasions. They, of course, form the centre piece of the mayoral chain of office, and I have seen a number of council websites that describe them as the "mayor's arms". However they are incorrect, although one would not expect a web designer to be familiar with the laws of arms. If one were to llook at the letters patent granting the arms, one would see that they were granted to the council itself. Anyway this all a bit obscure, but i hoope it adds a little clarity to the murk. Lozleader ( talk) 10:37, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Samsung Galaxy (esports) logos
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep File:Samsung Galaxy Pro-Game Team.png in the main infobox only and remove File:Samsung Khan.png as unopposed after almost two months. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 ( talk) 17:27, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
- File:Samsung Galaxy Pro-Game Team.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Fetx2002 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
- File:Samsung Khan.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Fetx2002 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
Non-free logos being used in Samsung Galaxy (esports). "File:Samsung Galaxy Pro-Game Team.png" is being used in the main infobox and in a gallery of logos, but only has a non-free use rationale for the infobox. "File:Samsung Khan.png" also has a non-free use rationale, but it's usage is purely decorative in a gallery of logos (See WP:NFG), so it lacks the contextual significance required by WP:NFCC#8. If these cannot be changed to public domain, I suggest for keep "Samsung Galaxy Pro-Game Team.png" in the main infobox only and remove for "Samsung Khan.png". -- Marchjuly ( talk) 05:06, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Mighty Morphin Power Rangers logo.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep in Mighty Morphin Power Rangers, remove all other instances. — ξ xplicit 04:47, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:Mighty Morphin Power Rangers logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Powergate92 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Non-free logo being used in Mighty Morphin Power Rangers, Mighty Morphin Power Rangers (season 1), Mighty Morphin Power Rangers (season 2), and Mighty Morphin Power Rangers (season 3). File has a non-free use rationale for each usage, but the usages in the individual season articles do not seem to comply with Nos. 14 and No. 17 of WP:NFC#UUI. Season specific logos are probably OK, but the logo for the show itself should not be being used. Suggest keep for "Mighty Morphin Power Rangers" and remove from the individual season articles. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 06:08, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Non-free Power Ranger logos in episode list articles
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep in main articles, remove from list articles. — ξ xplicit 04:47, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:PR Zeo logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Powergate92 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
- File:PR Turbo logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Powergate92 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
- File:PR Lost Galaxy logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Powergate92 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
- File:PR Lightspeed Rescue logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Powergate92 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
- File:PR Time Force logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Powergate92 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
- File:PR Wild Force logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Powergate92 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
- File:PR Ninja Storm logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Powergate92 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
- File:PR Dino Thunder logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Powergate92 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
- File:PR Jungle Fury logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Powergate92 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
- File:PR RPM logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Powergate92 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
- File:PR Samurai logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Powergate92 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
- File:Power Rangers Megaforce logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Powergate92 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
- File:PR S.P.D. logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Powergate92 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
- File:PRIS.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ryulong ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
- File:Super samurai.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ryulong ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
- File:PR Operation Overdrive logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ryūkotsusei ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
- File:Mystic Force logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Paulcmnt ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
- File:Power Rangers Super Megaforce logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by MarcoPolo250 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
- File:Power Rangers Dino Charge logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Strongjam ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
Non-free Power Rangers logos being used in various TV show articles and episode list article. Each usage has a non-free use rationale for each respective usage, but I only think the usages in the main articles about the shows themselves comply with WP:NFCC#8. Usage in the list article does not seem to comply with WP:NFCC#3 since the logo can be seen in the main article, and WP:NFCC#8 since the contextual significance required by WP:NFCC#8 is lacking. For reference, the usage of a similar logo in a list article was previously discussed in Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 January 27#File:Power Rangers Dino Super Charge logo.png and the result was to remove from the list article. I don't see how these are any different, so I suggest keep for the main articles and remove from the list articles. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 07:27, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: Unable to notify the uploader Ryulong because their user talk is protected and cannot be edited. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 07:27, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Sample RASD RUP & RAD.gif
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:Sample RASD RUP & RAD.gif ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Itsme01 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
This image was used in an article 9 years ago that was deleted fairly swiftly after creation, and it has been sitting around ever since. Such content should be created as a table in an article, not as a very blurry, contextless, jargon-laden GIF image. — This, that and the other (talk) 12:41, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:A Light Dependent Resistor schematic symbol.gif
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:A Light Dependent Resistor schematic symbol.gif ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Neilgravir ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 ( talk) 13:57, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Bowie-Blackstar-vinylcover.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:Bowie-Blackstar-vinylcover.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Electro Ultra 217 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8, no concrete criteria for understanding in context of the presence of a similar non-free image in the parent article. Easily replaceable by words. — IB [ Poke ] 14:21, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Nextbit Robin.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:Nextbit Robin.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ayub407 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Delete: As a non-free image of a phone which is not yet available to the public does not mean a free image could not be made, so it fails the first criteria of WP:NFCC. It only requires someone to gain access to one of these phones at a trade show or promotional event for an image to be made that could be freely licenced. ww2censor ( talk) 14:43, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Can't the copyrighted image be used until someone gain access to device to create a free licenced version of it? Ayub407 talk 15:49, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:DJKhaledICALDlx.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:DJKhaledICALDlx.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by BlaccCrab ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Redundant extra cover. Fails WP:NFCC#3a. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:00, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:JMW Turner Kenilworth Castle 1830.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: kept, changed to {{ PD-Art}}. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:51, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:JMW Turner Kenilworth Castle 1830.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by BrEdWhite ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Does this reproduction of a painting made in 1830 by an artist who died in 1851 fall under the scope of {{ PD-art}}? That is, a slavish reproduction of a work of art whose copyright has almost certainly expired. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 20:11, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The photograph of the painting doesn't seem to be copyrightable. The uploader seems to claim that the painting itself is copyrighted, though. I wonder why. Sure, if the painting was published for the first time approximately 200 years after it was painted, then it could be unfree, but this situation sounds unlikely. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 21:42, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Lotte Hotels & Resorts logo.gif
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Tagged as {{ PD-ineligible-USonly}}. The status of the image's copyright status in its originating country is currently unknown as it was not able to be definitively determined during the course of this discussion. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 ( talk) 22:08, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- File:Lotte Hotels & Resorts logo.gif ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mrhotelier ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
This fairly clearly is not copyrightable in the US - a line and text are not original enough. Would it be copyrightable in South Korea? If yes, this needs the PD-USonly tag, otherwise it should be moved to Commons. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 20:18, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Obviously not copyrightable in the United States. The South Korean copyright law seems to be similar to the Japanese copyright law, and logos like this are not copyrighted in Japan, so presumably they aren't copyrighted in South Korea either.
- There are probably thousands of mistagged textlogos on Wikipedia. Do you plan to list all of them on this page? Generally, it only seems useful to retag a mistagged logo if the logo has some foreseeable use outside the use already permitted under
WP:NFCI §2. --
Stefan2 (
talk) 21:46, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- @
Stefan2: (Offtopic) No, I don't plan to list each mistagged logo here. I am evaluating when it's appropriate to boldly change the license and when discussion is needed. One might make a point that not all these mistaggings are a problem and that I should just leave them.
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk,
contributions) 21:58, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- I come across these files all of the time, for example when searching for
WP:NFCC#9 violations. I tend to retag them (usually by uploading a cleaned up copy to Commons) if their use somehow comes in conflict with the
WP:NFCC policy (for example, because the image is used outside the article namespace), but typically ignore the file if leaving the file alone wouldn't cause any damage (all use compliant with
WP:NFCI §2) or if the only page using the image is likely to be deleted (declined AfC submission, listed as AfD or similar). --
Stefan2 (
talk) 22:06, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- For this, I commend you,
Stefan2. I don't feel confident enough to make analysis of TOO, so I just remove them when they violate NFCC#9 or NFCC#10c. I wish there was a process for this other than FFD, which I don't find ideal. Those lawyers at WMF should do something useful and devise a checklist for TOO status in Commons. –
Finnusertop (
talk ⋅
contribs) 13:26, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- I think that the main problem is that there is no fast method for converting a FUR template into a standard information template, so to save time, I only fix mistagged textlogos if it's absolutely necessary to convert the template and the logo isn't likely to be deleted as "out of scope" after an AfD closes or similar. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 21:36, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- For this, I commend you,
Stefan2. I don't feel confident enough to make analysis of TOO, so I just remove them when they violate NFCC#9 or NFCC#10c. I wish there was a process for this other than FFD, which I don't find ideal. Those lawyers at WMF should do something useful and devise a checklist for TOO status in Commons. –
Finnusertop (
talk ⋅
contribs) 13:26, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- I come across these files all of the time, for example when searching for
WP:NFCC#9 violations. I tend to retag them (usually by uploading a cleaned up copy to Commons) if their use somehow comes in conflict with the
WP:NFCC policy (for example, because the image is used outside the article namespace), but typically ignore the file if leaving the file alone wouldn't cause any damage (all use compliant with
WP:NFCI §2) or if the only page using the image is likely to be deleted (declined AfC submission, listed as AfD or similar). --
Stefan2 (
talk) 22:06, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- @
Stefan2: (Offtopic) No, I don't plan to list each mistagged logo here. I am evaluating when it's appropriate to boldly change the license and when discussion is needed. One might make a point that not all these mistaggings are a problem and that I should just leave them.
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk,
contributions) 21:58, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:NewUBClogo.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:NewUBClogo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ILCS07 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFC#UUI §17. Stefan2 ( talk) 23:02, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Bowie-Blackstar-vinylcover.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:Bowie-Blackstar-vinylcover.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Electro Ultra 217 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
The album was include the vinyl cover which it was design ith the new artwork by David Bowie after he died from liver cancer at aged of 69 Electro Ultra 217 ( talk) 23:32, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.