The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:10, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Fair use not used in any articles, used in a AfC, but AfC has been declined three times and was last edited in March Sven Manguard Wha? 01:12, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Fair use not used in any articles, used in a AfC, but AfC has been declined two times and was last edited in March Sven Manguard Wha? 01:14, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Fair use not used in any articles, used in a AfC, but AfC has been declined two times and was last edited in March Sven Manguard Wha? 01:14, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: keep, now used in article space. — ξ xplicit 00:53, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Fair use not used in any articles, used in a AfC, but AfC has been declined three times Sven Manguard Wha? 01:16, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Kept - I sense an editorial discussion that is needed on the article's talk page - Peripitus (Talk) 10:50, 22 June 2012 (UTC) reply
There is a free image File:Casi discovery channel.jpg of the Discovery channel logo (sans the small globe), and thus serves the same purpose as a logo. Unless there is specific discussion as the importance of the globe in the non-free version, the non-free is replaceable. MASEM ( t) 01:20, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The infobox should include the network logo, and File:Casi discovery channel.jpg isn't the logo used by Discovery Channel. The globe is an integrated part of the Discovery logo, and displaying something that isn't an actual logo used by the organization in question is misleading readers. Väsk ( talk) 16:07, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
non-free image not used in article space, used in a userspace draft, but draft not touched in 2 months Sven Manguard Wha? 03:53, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-free image not used in an article. Used in an AfC submission that was declined and hasn't been touched since April. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:16, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-free image not used in the article space. Used in a userpage draft not touched since April. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:50, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-free image not used in the article space. Used in a userpage draft not touched since April. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:50, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-free image not used in the article space. Used in a userpage (which isn't allowed). Sven Manguard Wha? 04:51, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-free image not used in the article space. Used in a AfC draft not touched since April. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:52, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-free image not used in the article space. Used in a userpage draft not touched since April. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:52, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-free image not used in the article space. Used in a userpage draft not touched since March. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:53, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
non-free image not used in the article space. Used in a userpage draft that has not been touched since April Sven Manguard Wha? 04:59, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Probably is actually PD-text/PD-textlogo rather than non-free, but is orphaned and too small to be of use Sven Manguard Wha? 05:00, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Web resolution, without description, unused Bulwersator ( talk) 07:14, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Uploader asserts fair use in the summary although it's tagged public domain (appears they were having difficulty with the upload wizard), but it doesn't qualify as either – the site it's taken from has a copyright notice (Copyright @ 2012. Dolores Cannon. All Rights Reserved), and as a non-free image of a living person it would fall foul of WP:NFC#UUI. January ( talk) 09:43, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Seemingly corrupt file. J Milburn ( talk) 10:14, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused... Doubt it will ever be used. MGA73 ( talk) 15:48, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused userpage image (I think). MGA73 ( talk) 15:51, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Still needed? MGA73 ( talk) 16:01, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. It's a cover so we may need a permission anyway. MGA73 ( talk) 16:02, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. We would probably need a permission to keep it. MGA73 ( talk) 16:03, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused map for now deleted article MAG (computer game). MGA73 ( talk) 16:04, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. No good source and we would probably need a permission. MGA73 ( talk) 16:05, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Low res. Is uploader = photographer? MGA73 ( talk) 16:08, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Is this person notable? Is uploader = copyright holder? MGA73 ( talk) 16:09, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused userpage image. MGA73 ( talk) 16:13, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused userpage image. MGA73 ( talk) 16:14, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Low res. MGA73 ( talk) 16:15, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 6 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Low res. MGA73 ( talk) 16:16, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. No description. Not usable? MGA73 ( talk) 16:17, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused userpage image. MGA73 ( talk) 16:18, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused userpage image. MGA73 ( talk) 16:18, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused userpage image. MGA73 ( talk) 16:19, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused userpage image or copyrighted cartoon? MGA73 ( talk) 16:25, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Zzapamiga removed an image that marginally met NFCC #8 and replaced it with this, a generic image that does not meet NFCC #8. I have undone the change, which orphans this non-free image Sven Manguard Wha? 16:26, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Zzapamiga removed an image that marginally met NFCC #8 and replaced it with this, a generic image that does not meet NFCC #8. I have undone the change, which orphans this non-free image Sven Manguard Wha? 16:27, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: delete all. — ξ xplicit 00:53, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Related to Prophecy of the Popes but new versions of the "Papal coats of arms" have been made in svg.
All files:
MGA73 ( talk) 16:33, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Uploader removed an identical but properly shrunk image, in favor of this, which is too large. The change has been reverted, however that orphans this non-free file. Sven Manguard Wha? 16:37, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused cover of a book. MGA73 ( talk) 16:50, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Low res. No longer needed? MGA73 ( talk) 16:51, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. No description. MGA73 ( talk) 16:52, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused userpage image (I think). MGA73 ( talk) 16:53, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Not a usable format on wiki. MGA73 ( talk) 16:54, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused userpage image (I think). MGA73 ( talk) 16:56, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused userpage image (I think). MGA73 ( talk) 16:56, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused userpage image (I think). MGA73 ( talk) 16:57, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Yes, it's true, it's an unused userpage photo to go with my sadly underused userpage. Delete away! Or should I delete it to save you the trouble? BearMachine ( talk) 21:35, 7 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Low res. No forseen usage. MGA73 ( talk) 16:57, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused userpage image? No forseen usage. MGA73 ( talk) 16:58, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. No forseen usage. MGA73 ( talk) 16:59, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. No forseen usage. MGA73 ( talk) 17:00, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused userpage image. MGA73 ( talk) 17:01, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Low res. Does not look good as a thumb. Also no evidence of permission. MGA73 ( talk) 17:03, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused... Usable? MGA73 ( talk) 18:42, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphan userpage image. MGA73 ( talk) 18:46, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused... If we want to keep it we should have a permission. MGA73 ( talk) 18:46, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Uploader = author? I would think so but a permission would be nice. And would it be usable? MGA73 ( talk) 18:50, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Uploader = author? I would think so but a permission would be nice. And would it be usable? MGA73 ( talk) 18:51, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Uploader = author? I would think so but a permission would be nice. And would it be usable? MGA73 ( talk) 18:51, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Uploader = author? I would think so but a permission would be nice. And would it be usable? MGA73 ( talk) 18:52, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Uploader = author? I would think so but a permission would be nice. And would it be usable? MGA73 ( talk) 18:53, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Uploader = author? I would think so but a permission would be nice. And would it be usable? MGA73 ( talk) 18:53, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Uploader = author? I would think so but a permission would be nice. And would it be usable? MGA73 ( talk) 18:53, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Not usable? Who created the images used in the collage? MGA73 ( talk) 18:56, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unfree orphaned image - article has been deleted per CSD. Image Not uploaded by the creator. No evidence of permission. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 18:59, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Not a notable person? MGA73 ( talk) 19:00, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused userpage image. MGA73 ( talk) 19:01, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Nyttend ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:13, 5 June 2012 (UTC) reply
See File talk:Unstoppable-McClain.jpg: "I recently made this cover on piZap.com to make the section of the article look more expanded and detailed. This is not the official cover of the song. ~ RomeAntic14 16:26, 2 June 2012 (UTC)" This is thus a fake cover, so it fails WP:NFCC#8. Besides, the article already has another image ( File:ANT Farm Soundtrack Cover.jpg) which illustrates the same soundtrack, so the image also fails WP:NFCC#3a in the article. The excessive resolution additionally makes it fail WP:NFCC#3b. Stefan2 ( talk) 19:42, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Musicfreak7676 uploaded this non-free image and replaced an existing non-free image in the article. Because the new one is of lower quality and they're otherwise about equal, I undid the change. That orphaned this non-free file. Sven Manguard Wha? 19:45, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-free image just showing two characters standing together. Fails NFCC 8 Sven Manguard Wha? 19:51, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-free image just showing two characters standing together. Fails NFCC 8 Sven Manguard Wha? 19:52, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-free image just showing three characters standing together. Fails NFCC 8 Sven Manguard Wha? 19:52, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Creativity97 uploaded this non-free image and replaced an existing non-free image in the article. Because the new one is of lower quality and they're otherwise about equal, I undid the change. That orphaned this non-free file Sven Manguard Wha? 20:01, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
No need for three non-free images of the same couple. Sven Manguard Wha? 20:02, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Kept. Note that a former version of the same idea was kept at a discussion back in 2007 Wikipedia:Images_and_media_for_deletion/2007_December_30#Image:10dr19.jpg - Peripitus (Talk) 12:19, 13 June 2012 (UTC) reply
This file could be replaced by a version just showing the voice actors using a collage comprising the images from their respective articles. Sent to DI, but DI was removed. C3F2k ( Questions, comments, complaints?) 20:05, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Kept - the other image has already been deleted as a non-free orphan - Peripitus (Talk) 12:23, 13 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Musicfreak7676 uploaded this non-free image and replaced an existing non-free image in the article. Because the new one is of lower quality and they're otherwise about equal, I undid the change. That orphaned this non-free file. Sven Manguard Wha? 20:07, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G5 by Kww ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 11 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:NFCC#3a since the article already has a different cover for the product: File:AYearWithoutRain.jpg. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:13, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G5 by Kww ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 11 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:NFCC#3a since the article already contains an almost identical item: File:RadioRebel.jpg. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:21, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:05, 13 June 2012 (UTC) reply
T.V Screenshot Invalid for license that it has - NOT FREE - - Jrobb525 22:45, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:10, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Fair use not used in any articles, used in a AfC, but AfC has been declined three times and was last edited in March Sven Manguard Wha? 01:12, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Fair use not used in any articles, used in a AfC, but AfC has been declined two times and was last edited in March Sven Manguard Wha? 01:14, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Fair use not used in any articles, used in a AfC, but AfC has been declined two times and was last edited in March Sven Manguard Wha? 01:14, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: keep, now used in article space. — ξ xplicit 00:53, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Fair use not used in any articles, used in a AfC, but AfC has been declined three times Sven Manguard Wha? 01:16, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Kept - I sense an editorial discussion that is needed on the article's talk page - Peripitus (Talk) 10:50, 22 June 2012 (UTC) reply
There is a free image File:Casi discovery channel.jpg of the Discovery channel logo (sans the small globe), and thus serves the same purpose as a logo. Unless there is specific discussion as the importance of the globe in the non-free version, the non-free is replaceable. MASEM ( t) 01:20, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The infobox should include the network logo, and File:Casi discovery channel.jpg isn't the logo used by Discovery Channel. The globe is an integrated part of the Discovery logo, and displaying something that isn't an actual logo used by the organization in question is misleading readers. Väsk ( talk) 16:07, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
non-free image not used in article space, used in a userspace draft, but draft not touched in 2 months Sven Manguard Wha? 03:53, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-free image not used in an article. Used in an AfC submission that was declined and hasn't been touched since April. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:16, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-free image not used in the article space. Used in a userpage draft not touched since April. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:50, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-free image not used in the article space. Used in a userpage draft not touched since April. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:50, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-free image not used in the article space. Used in a userpage (which isn't allowed). Sven Manguard Wha? 04:51, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-free image not used in the article space. Used in a AfC draft not touched since April. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:52, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-free image not used in the article space. Used in a userpage draft not touched since April. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:52, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-free image not used in the article space. Used in a userpage draft not touched since March. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:53, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
non-free image not used in the article space. Used in a userpage draft that has not been touched since April Sven Manguard Wha? 04:59, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Probably is actually PD-text/PD-textlogo rather than non-free, but is orphaned and too small to be of use Sven Manguard Wha? 05:00, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Web resolution, without description, unused Bulwersator ( talk) 07:14, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Uploader asserts fair use in the summary although it's tagged public domain (appears they were having difficulty with the upload wizard), but it doesn't qualify as either – the site it's taken from has a copyright notice (Copyright @ 2012. Dolores Cannon. All Rights Reserved), and as a non-free image of a living person it would fall foul of WP:NFC#UUI. January ( talk) 09:43, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Seemingly corrupt file. J Milburn ( talk) 10:14, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused... Doubt it will ever be used. MGA73 ( talk) 15:48, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused userpage image (I think). MGA73 ( talk) 15:51, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Still needed? MGA73 ( talk) 16:01, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. It's a cover so we may need a permission anyway. MGA73 ( talk) 16:02, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. We would probably need a permission to keep it. MGA73 ( talk) 16:03, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused map for now deleted article MAG (computer game). MGA73 ( talk) 16:04, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. No good source and we would probably need a permission. MGA73 ( talk) 16:05, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Low res. Is uploader = photographer? MGA73 ( talk) 16:08, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Is this person notable? Is uploader = copyright holder? MGA73 ( talk) 16:09, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused userpage image. MGA73 ( talk) 16:13, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused userpage image. MGA73 ( talk) 16:14, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Low res. MGA73 ( talk) 16:15, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 6 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Low res. MGA73 ( talk) 16:16, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. No description. Not usable? MGA73 ( talk) 16:17, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused userpage image. MGA73 ( talk) 16:18, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused userpage image. MGA73 ( talk) 16:18, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused userpage image. MGA73 ( talk) 16:19, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused userpage image or copyrighted cartoon? MGA73 ( talk) 16:25, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Zzapamiga removed an image that marginally met NFCC #8 and replaced it with this, a generic image that does not meet NFCC #8. I have undone the change, which orphans this non-free image Sven Manguard Wha? 16:26, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Zzapamiga removed an image that marginally met NFCC #8 and replaced it with this, a generic image that does not meet NFCC #8. I have undone the change, which orphans this non-free image Sven Manguard Wha? 16:27, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: delete all. — ξ xplicit 00:53, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Related to Prophecy of the Popes but new versions of the "Papal coats of arms" have been made in svg.
All files:
MGA73 ( talk) 16:33, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Uploader removed an identical but properly shrunk image, in favor of this, which is too large. The change has been reverted, however that orphans this non-free file. Sven Manguard Wha? 16:37, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused cover of a book. MGA73 ( talk) 16:50, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Low res. No longer needed? MGA73 ( talk) 16:51, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. No description. MGA73 ( talk) 16:52, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused userpage image (I think). MGA73 ( talk) 16:53, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Not a usable format on wiki. MGA73 ( talk) 16:54, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused userpage image (I think). MGA73 ( talk) 16:56, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused userpage image (I think). MGA73 ( talk) 16:56, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused userpage image (I think). MGA73 ( talk) 16:57, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Yes, it's true, it's an unused userpage photo to go with my sadly underused userpage. Delete away! Or should I delete it to save you the trouble? BearMachine ( talk) 21:35, 7 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Low res. No forseen usage. MGA73 ( talk) 16:57, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused userpage image? No forseen usage. MGA73 ( talk) 16:58, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. No forseen usage. MGA73 ( talk) 16:59, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. No forseen usage. MGA73 ( talk) 17:00, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused userpage image. MGA73 ( talk) 17:01, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Low res. Does not look good as a thumb. Also no evidence of permission. MGA73 ( talk) 17:03, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused... Usable? MGA73 ( talk) 18:42, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphan userpage image. MGA73 ( talk) 18:46, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused... If we want to keep it we should have a permission. MGA73 ( talk) 18:46, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Uploader = author? I would think so but a permission would be nice. And would it be usable? MGA73 ( talk) 18:50, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Uploader = author? I would think so but a permission would be nice. And would it be usable? MGA73 ( talk) 18:51, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Uploader = author? I would think so but a permission would be nice. And would it be usable? MGA73 ( talk) 18:51, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Uploader = author? I would think so but a permission would be nice. And would it be usable? MGA73 ( talk) 18:52, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Uploader = author? I would think so but a permission would be nice. And would it be usable? MGA73 ( talk) 18:53, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Uploader = author? I would think so but a permission would be nice. And would it be usable? MGA73 ( talk) 18:53, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Uploader = author? I would think so but a permission would be nice. And would it be usable? MGA73 ( talk) 18:53, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Not usable? Who created the images used in the collage? MGA73 ( talk) 18:56, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unfree orphaned image - article has been deleted per CSD. Image Not uploaded by the creator. No evidence of permission. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 18:59, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Not a notable person? MGA73 ( talk) 19:00, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused userpage image. MGA73 ( talk) 19:01, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Nyttend ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:13, 5 June 2012 (UTC) reply
See File talk:Unstoppable-McClain.jpg: "I recently made this cover on piZap.com to make the section of the article look more expanded and detailed. This is not the official cover of the song. ~ RomeAntic14 16:26, 2 June 2012 (UTC)" This is thus a fake cover, so it fails WP:NFCC#8. Besides, the article already has another image ( File:ANT Farm Soundtrack Cover.jpg) which illustrates the same soundtrack, so the image also fails WP:NFCC#3a in the article. The excessive resolution additionally makes it fail WP:NFCC#3b. Stefan2 ( talk) 19:42, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Musicfreak7676 uploaded this non-free image and replaced an existing non-free image in the article. Because the new one is of lower quality and they're otherwise about equal, I undid the change. That orphaned this non-free file. Sven Manguard Wha? 19:45, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-free image just showing two characters standing together. Fails NFCC 8 Sven Manguard Wha? 19:51, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-free image just showing two characters standing together. Fails NFCC 8 Sven Manguard Wha? 19:52, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-free image just showing three characters standing together. Fails NFCC 8 Sven Manguard Wha? 19:52, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Creativity97 uploaded this non-free image and replaced an existing non-free image in the article. Because the new one is of lower quality and they're otherwise about equal, I undid the change. That orphaned this non-free file Sven Manguard Wha? 20:01, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
No need for three non-free images of the same couple. Sven Manguard Wha? 20:02, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Kept. Note that a former version of the same idea was kept at a discussion back in 2007 Wikipedia:Images_and_media_for_deletion/2007_December_30#Image:10dr19.jpg - Peripitus (Talk) 12:19, 13 June 2012 (UTC) reply
This file could be replaced by a version just showing the voice actors using a collage comprising the images from their respective articles. Sent to DI, but DI was removed. C3F2k ( Questions, comments, complaints?) 20:05, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Kept - the other image has already been deleted as a non-free orphan - Peripitus (Talk) 12:23, 13 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Musicfreak7676 uploaded this non-free image and replaced an existing non-free image in the article. Because the new one is of lower quality and they're otherwise about equal, I undid the change. That orphaned this non-free file. Sven Manguard Wha? 20:07, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G5 by Kww ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 11 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:NFCC#3a since the article already has a different cover for the product: File:AYearWithoutRain.jpg. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:13, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G5 by Kww ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 11 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:NFCC#3a since the article already contains an almost identical item: File:RadioRebel.jpg. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:21, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:05, 13 June 2012 (UTC) reply
T.V Screenshot Invalid for license that it has - NOT FREE - - Jrobb525 22:45, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply