The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 17 September 2009 (UTC) reply

File:VisaFreeAccessforIndianCitizens.PNG ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Erasheed ( notify | contribs).

• orphaned, licensed as Wikipedia web page screenshot is clearly incorrect, no target article provided Skier Dude ( talk) 02:19, 10 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 17 September 2009 (UTC) reply

File:VisaFreeAccessForUsCitizens.PNG ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Erasheed ( notify | contribs).

• orphaned, licensed as Wikipedia web page screenshot is clearly incorrect, no target article provided Skier Dude ( talk) 02:20, 10 September 2009 (UTC) reply
• Delete Fails WP:NFCC, criteria 9. 67.150.51.32 ( talk) 01:18, 11 September 2009 (UTC) reply
• Comment I disagree that is fails non-free content criteria #9 as it has not been established as being non-free. The current license appears to be incorrect though.-- Rockfang ( talk) 08:47, 11 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 17 September 2009 (UTC) reply

File:VisaFreeAccessForEmiratiCitizens.PNG ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Erasheed ( notify | contribs).

• orphaned, licensed as Wikipedia web page screenshot is clearly incorrect, no target article provided Skier Dude ( talk) 02:20, 10 September 2009 (UTC) reply
• Delete orphaned image with incorrect tagging and no description. Cheers, I' ^mperator 20:56, 14 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 17 September 2009 (UTC) reply

File:VisaFreeAccessForIsraeliCitizens.PNG ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Erasheed ( notify | contribs).

• licensed as Wikipedia web page screenshot is clearly incorrect, no source provided Skier Dude ( talk) 02:20, 10 September 2009 (UTC) reply
• Delete orphaned image with incorrect tagging and no description. Cheers, I' ^mperator 20:56, 14 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 17 September 2009 (UTC) reply

File:VisaFreeAccessForChineseCitizens.PNG ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Erasheed ( notify | contribs).

• licensed as Wikipedia web page screenshot is clearly incorrect, no source provided Skier Dude ( talk) 02:21, 10 September 2009 (UTC) reply
• Delete orphaned image with incorrect tagging and no description. Cheers, I' ^mperator 20:56, 14 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 17 September 2009 (UTC) reply

File:UnitedStatesVisaFree.PNG ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Erasheed ( notify | contribs).

• licensed as Wikipedia web page screenshot is clearly incorrect, no source provided Skier Dude ( talk) 02:21, 10 September 2009 (UTC) reply
• Delete orphaned image with incorrect tagging and no description. Cheers, I' ^mperator 20:57, 14 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 17 September 2009 (UTC) reply

File:VisaFreeAccess.PNG ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Erasheed ( notify | contribs).

• orphaned, licensed as Wikipedia web page screenshot is clearly incorrect, no target article provided, no source provided Skier Dude ( talk) 02:22, 10 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 17 September 2009 (UTC) reply

File:Your Mother's Got a Penis.ogg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Estragons ( notify | contribs).

• File does not increase the readers' understanding and it is not discussed in the article. Audio clip also surpasses the limit listed at WP:SAMPLE. — Σ xplicit 05:30, 10 September 2009 (UTC) reply
• Delete Yep, fails WP:SAMPLE and there's no discussion whatsoever of the songs structure, sound, etc. The absence of the track would not detract from reader's understanding of the article (which essentially says the song exists, and what it was based on). -- Hammersoft ( talk) 21:46, 10 September 2009 (UTC) reply
• Delete per failure to comply w/ WP:SAMPLE. 1) "The sample is being used for commentary on the recording in question." 2)"It contributes significantly to the encyclopedia articles it is used in (listed under the heading "File links" below) in a way that cannot be duplicated by other forms of media." Yeah...no. Cheers, I' ^mperator 20:59, 14 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G3 by Graeme Bartlett ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 12 September 2009 (UTC) reply

File:Insectivorous Plants Drew's copy.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Drew R. Smith ( notify | contribs).

• Confirmed forgery. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:29, 10 September 2009 (UTC) reply
• Delete. Absolutely no need to keep an admitted forgery - which should never be used in an article - even for archival purposes. The V-Man ^{( Said · Done)} 20:40, 10 September 2009 (UTC) reply
• Delete User even admits that it is a forgery (and is blocked). How much more blatant can you get? He may as well put G7 on it... 67.150.51.32 ( talk) 01:07, 11 September 2009 (UTC) reply
• Sorry for interrupting the discussion, but I have speedy deleted it. Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 02:44, 12 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Russian copyright law from 1993 restored copyright to publications from 1943 or later. A 2004 amendment increased that to 70 years for anonymous works that were still copyrighted, which this phone book wasn't. - Nv8200p talk 18:36, 27 September 2009 (UTC) reply

File:Phone book.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mhym ( notify | contribs).

• Image hosted on LOC page, but there is no description page for it to confirm copyright status. Per license tag, should nom for deletion. εω ( talk) 23:44, 10 September 2009 (UTC) reply
• Delete Evidently not published before 1923, thus failing WP:PD. 67.150.51.32 ( talk) 01:11, 11 September 2009 (UTC) reply
• Keep book cover which is also in a LOC collection. Mhym ( talk) 01:28, 11 September 2009 (UTC) reply
• Keep - an anonymous work published more than 70 years ago {{ PD-old-70}} Alex Bakharev ( talk) 03:42, 11 September 2009 (UTC) reply

  Images on this site need to be free to use in the USA, and this one isn't. Stifle ( talk) 11:33, 19 September 2009 (UTC) reply

• Delete unless a proper copyright tag is applied. Note that {{ PD-old-70}} is not on its own sufficient, as the tag itself describes. Stifle ( talk) 08:14, 14 September 2009 (UTC) reply
• Delete. Actually, {{ PD-US-1996}} is what would apply. But it was published in 1930 (author unknown), so its copyright expired in 2000, which is too late to meet the US rule. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:51, 17 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.