Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2011 at 10:41:33 (UTC)
Reason
Yeah, the depth of field is a bit thin, but that is because it is a very small bird, and the photo was taken in technically challenging conditions (1/20th, 700mm, iso 1600 wide open!). The important part is in focus, and you can still see the plumage clearly. One of my favorite birds I think. I spent quite a long time in a hide to get it.
Support I agree these guys are hard to get close to. Nice. It's amazing you can get an iso1600 to look so good! --
99of9 (
talk) 11:37, 27 July 2011 (UTC)reply
Support Good posture, nice image. --
Elekhh (
talk) 23:33, 27 July 2011 (UTC)reply
Support the blur is not bad and if getting any better is near-impossible then this works for me.
Pine (was GreenPine)talk 09:03, 28 July 2011 (UTC)reply
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2011 at 10:41:33 (UTC)
Reason
Yeah, the depth of field is a bit thin, but that is because it is a very small bird, and the photo was taken in technically challenging conditions (1/20th, 700mm, iso 1600 wide open!). The important part is in focus, and you can still see the plumage clearly. One of my favorite birds I think. I spent quite a long time in a hide to get it.
Support I agree these guys are hard to get close to. Nice. It's amazing you can get an iso1600 to look so good! --
99of9 (
talk) 11:37, 27 July 2011 (UTC)reply
Support Good posture, nice image. --
Elekhh (
talk) 23:33, 27 July 2011 (UTC)reply
Support the blur is not bad and if getting any better is near-impossible then this works for me.
Pine (was GreenPine)talk 09:03, 28 July 2011 (UTC)reply