Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2023 at 19:36:28 (UTC)
Reason
High resolution, really popular image, high quality. Probably one of the most iconic portraits of all time, it even has
its own article. There was a
previous nomination for this image which failed to be promoted to featured picture status, however that was a lower quality and highly compressed
older version of the photo which was uploaded in 2006. It has since now been updated and I believe it deserves the status.
Compared to
File:Heroico1.jpg, it looks like a bunch of grain has been removed using a blur tool. Adam Cuerden(
talk)Has about 8.6% of all
FPs. 21:09, 29 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment: I did not create this image, I only performed some reverts. The lack of grain is claimed to be the result of AI cleanup, but I do not know if this is true or not. —
Huntster (
t@c) 22:34, 29 October 2023 (UTC)reply
I don't think AI cleanup is a good idea for old photos. AI does not understand film grain. OpposeAdam Cuerden(
talk)Has about 8.6% of all
FPs. 08:53, 30 October 2023 (UTC)reply
I've found what I think is the true source - that image definitely isn't the V&A image - given the appearance of lines and spots based on damage to it, especially the one on the cap. .
I'll clean that up later. Adam Cuerden(
talk)Has about 8.6% of all
FPs. 09:11, 30 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Restoration uploded. Support Alt 1Adam Cuerden(
talk)Has about 8.6% of all
FPs. 23:17, 30 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Support Alt 1 --
Yann (
talk) 13:15, 31 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Support Alt 1 that's pretty good! certainly better than the one i posted -
Howardcorn33 (
talk) 17:21, 31 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2023 at 19:36:28 (UTC)
Reason
High resolution, really popular image, high quality. Probably one of the most iconic portraits of all time, it even has
its own article. There was a
previous nomination for this image which failed to be promoted to featured picture status, however that was a lower quality and highly compressed
older version of the photo which was uploaded in 2006. It has since now been updated and I believe it deserves the status.
Compared to
File:Heroico1.jpg, it looks like a bunch of grain has been removed using a blur tool. Adam Cuerden(
talk)Has about 8.6% of all
FPs. 21:09, 29 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment: I did not create this image, I only performed some reverts. The lack of grain is claimed to be the result of AI cleanup, but I do not know if this is true or not. —
Huntster (
t@c) 22:34, 29 October 2023 (UTC)reply
I don't think AI cleanup is a good idea for old photos. AI does not understand film grain. OpposeAdam Cuerden(
talk)Has about 8.6% of all
FPs. 08:53, 30 October 2023 (UTC)reply
I've found what I think is the true source - that image definitely isn't the V&A image - given the appearance of lines and spots based on damage to it, especially the one on the cap. .
I'll clean that up later. Adam Cuerden(
talk)Has about 8.6% of all
FPs. 09:11, 30 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Restoration uploded. Support Alt 1Adam Cuerden(
talk)Has about 8.6% of all
FPs. 23:17, 30 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Support Alt 1 --
Yann (
talk) 13:15, 31 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Support Alt 1 that's pretty good! certainly better than the one i posted -
Howardcorn33 (
talk) 17:21, 31 October 2023 (UTC)reply