The article was removed by YellowAssessmentMonkey 00:21, 25 February 2010 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this featured article for review because this article was promoted in November 2005 and since then the criteria have became more stringent. This article is currently lacking in its referencing (1c) with several sections lacking any in-line citations and those which do still need more. There are also issues with the inconsistent format of the referencing (2c) and with lists of content which should either be removed and/or replaced with prose in the Bases and Facilities section (3b). - MBK 004 11:27, 16 January 2010 (UTC) reply
There are three links to disambig pages, two broken external links and none of the images has alt-text. bamse ( talk) 12:52, 16 January 2010 (UTC) reply
There are a lot of images, so my comments on each will be brief.
The template showing the First ships of the IJN isn't directly relevant and can be removed. The See also and External links sections should also be trimmed; only very relevant links should be listed. The IJN template should probably be moved down so that it's next to the JapanEmpireNavbox. DrKiernan ( talk) 09:30, 20 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The article was removed by YellowAssessmentMonkey 00:21, 25 February 2010 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this featured article for review because this article was promoted in November 2005 and since then the criteria have became more stringent. This article is currently lacking in its referencing (1c) with several sections lacking any in-line citations and those which do still need more. There are also issues with the inconsistent format of the referencing (2c) and with lists of content which should either be removed and/or replaced with prose in the Bases and Facilities section (3b). - MBK 004 11:27, 16 January 2010 (UTC) reply
There are three links to disambig pages, two broken external links and none of the images has alt-text. bamse ( talk) 12:52, 16 January 2010 (UTC) reply
There are a lot of images, so my comments on each will be brief.
The template showing the First ships of the IJN isn't directly relevant and can be removed. The See also and External links sections should also be trimmed; only very relevant links should be listed. The IJN template should probably be moved down so that it's next to the JapanEmpireNavbox. DrKiernan ( talk) 09:30, 20 January 2010 (UTC) reply