The article was promoted by Karanacs 16:29, 13 September 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because I feel it's of appropriate length, provides necessary and concise information on the topic, is well-researched and -referenced, and is of a generally high quality. Thanks. — Anonymous Dissident Talk 05:39, 16 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Comment Support: An engrossing, comprehensive article on an interesting corner of literary history. The prose is not quite there, yet, but I believe it can quite quickly be brought up to standard. Sources look good. Here are my detailed comments:-
Exceptions were those in numbers 42, 50 and 58. No. 42 mocked the Country Tories by imagining how an Ancient Greek or Roman would react to party politics: "...convey [him] to a Hunting-Match, or Horse Race, or any other Meeting of Patriots. Will he not immediately conclude from all the Roaring and Ranting, the Hallowing and the Hazzaing, the Gaming and Drinking, [...] that he is actually present at the Orgia of Bacchus, or the Celebration of some such Festival?". Number 50 blamed the growth of the London mob on poverty laws, while number 58 targeted the "Independent Electors of Westminster"
Altogether, engaging and good. - User:Brianboulton ( talk) 17:54, 16 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Note: I am happy with the responses to my queries, and have upgraded my comments to "support". Brianboulton ( talk) 14:52, 26 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Comment. Alt text is done; thanks. For more on the why images need alt text, please see WP:ALT and the "alt text" entry in the toolbox at the upper right of this review page. Eubulides ( talk) 07:28, 17 August 2009 (UTC) reply
The article was promoted by Karanacs 16:29, 13 September 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because I feel it's of appropriate length, provides necessary and concise information on the topic, is well-researched and -referenced, and is of a generally high quality. Thanks. — Anonymous Dissident Talk 05:39, 16 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Comment Support: An engrossing, comprehensive article on an interesting corner of literary history. The prose is not quite there, yet, but I believe it can quite quickly be brought up to standard. Sources look good. Here are my detailed comments:-
Exceptions were those in numbers 42, 50 and 58. No. 42 mocked the Country Tories by imagining how an Ancient Greek or Roman would react to party politics: "...convey [him] to a Hunting-Match, or Horse Race, or any other Meeting of Patriots. Will he not immediately conclude from all the Roaring and Ranting, the Hallowing and the Hazzaing, the Gaming and Drinking, [...] that he is actually present at the Orgia of Bacchus, or the Celebration of some such Festival?". Number 50 blamed the growth of the London mob on poverty laws, while number 58 targeted the "Independent Electors of Westminster"
Altogether, engaging and good. - User:Brianboulton ( talk) 17:54, 16 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Note: I am happy with the responses to my queries, and have upgraded my comments to "support". Brianboulton ( talk) 14:52, 26 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Comment. Alt text is done; thanks. For more on the why images need alt text, please see WP:ALT and the "alt text" entry in the toolbox at the upper right of this review page. Eubulides ( talk) 07:28, 17 August 2009 (UTC) reply