The article was promoted by Ian Rose ( talk) 23:50, 19 August 2014 [1].
The Bread-Winners ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Toolbox |
---|
This article is about... a rather dated book by John Hay, subject of my last nomination. Controversial as it presented a hostile view of organized labor, Hay prudently published the book anonymously, which led to quite a guessing game that is now entirely forgotten, but that was one of the literary events of 1883. Enjoy. Wehwalt ( talk) 01:16, 10 August 2014 (UTC) reply
Support: I, too, carried out a detailed peer review. I have reread the article and picked up a few minor points that I either missed or have arisen since my earlier review:
These points are easily dealt with, and I see no reason to withhold support meantime. An interesting study of a forgotten literary work (which perhaps had best remain forgotten). Brianboulton ( talk) 23:40, 13 August 2014 (UTC) reply
Support on prose per standard disclaimer. These are my edits. As always, feel free to revert my copyediting. - Dank ( push to talk) 22:02, 14 August 2014 (UTC) reply
Source review
Only one wrinkle, around caps, with Dalrymple having lower case text after the colon: all the other sources are capitalised throughout. - SchroCat ( talk) 10:53, 15 August 2014 (UTC) reply
Images All images are OK: PD and with appropriate descriptions. - SchroCat ( talk) 10:59, 15 August 2014 (UTC) reply
The article was promoted by Ian Rose ( talk) 23:50, 19 August 2014 [1].
The Bread-Winners ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Toolbox |
---|
This article is about... a rather dated book by John Hay, subject of my last nomination. Controversial as it presented a hostile view of organized labor, Hay prudently published the book anonymously, which led to quite a guessing game that is now entirely forgotten, but that was one of the literary events of 1883. Enjoy. Wehwalt ( talk) 01:16, 10 August 2014 (UTC) reply
Support: I, too, carried out a detailed peer review. I have reread the article and picked up a few minor points that I either missed or have arisen since my earlier review:
These points are easily dealt with, and I see no reason to withhold support meantime. An interesting study of a forgotten literary work (which perhaps had best remain forgotten). Brianboulton ( talk) 23:40, 13 August 2014 (UTC) reply
Support on prose per standard disclaimer. These are my edits. As always, feel free to revert my copyediting. - Dank ( push to talk) 22:02, 14 August 2014 (UTC) reply
Source review
Only one wrinkle, around caps, with Dalrymple having lower case text after the colon: all the other sources are capitalised throughout. - SchroCat ( talk) 10:53, 15 August 2014 (UTC) reply
Images All images are OK: PD and with appropriate descriptions. - SchroCat ( talk) 10:59, 15 August 2014 (UTC) reply