The article was promoted by Sarastro1 via FACBot ( talk) 13:00, 31 December 2017 [1].
This article is about a pretty reasonable home-grown Yugoslav fighter aircraft of which only 12 were produced. Their pilots fought bravely against the April 1941 invasion of their country, but most if not all were destroyed in the fighting. The design was used as the basis for the locally built post-war S-49 fighter. This article went through Milhist A-Class review a year or so ago, and has been stable since then. Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 09:49, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Image review
The only thing I can find is that you need to lose "England" from the location of the Green & Swanborough book. Otherwise, sources look in good order and of appropriate quality/reliability. Brianboulton ( talk) 19:04, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Kudos for writing an interesting article about a relatively obscure plane. It isn't there yet. Fuller review to follow. -- John ( talk) 23:12, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
No disrespect to John, but "it isn't here yet" is not a particularly helpful comment, and doesn't leave a lot to go on.
— HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:35, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
@ FAC coordinators: this looks good to go, can I nominate a new one please? Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 03:47, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Having checked changes since my last edit around the time of the article's ACR, and performed a minor ce, I see nothing preventing elevation to FA status -- well done. Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 03:35, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
The article was promoted by Sarastro1 via FACBot ( talk) 13:00, 31 December 2017 [1].
This article is about a pretty reasonable home-grown Yugoslav fighter aircraft of which only 12 were produced. Their pilots fought bravely against the April 1941 invasion of their country, but most if not all were destroyed in the fighting. The design was used as the basis for the locally built post-war S-49 fighter. This article went through Milhist A-Class review a year or so ago, and has been stable since then. Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 09:49, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Image review
The only thing I can find is that you need to lose "England" from the location of the Green & Swanborough book. Otherwise, sources look in good order and of appropriate quality/reliability. Brianboulton ( talk) 19:04, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Kudos for writing an interesting article about a relatively obscure plane. It isn't there yet. Fuller review to follow. -- John ( talk) 23:12, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
No disrespect to John, but "it isn't here yet" is not a particularly helpful comment, and doesn't leave a lot to go on.
— HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:35, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
@ FAC coordinators: this looks good to go, can I nominate a new one please? Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 03:47, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Having checked changes since my last edit around the time of the article's ACR, and performed a minor ce, I see nothing preventing elevation to FA status -- well done. Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 03:35, 31 December 2017 (UTC)