The article was not promoted by GrahamColm 19:01, 4 May 2012 [1].
Jim Carrey ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because I feel that it gives a thoroughly detailed and insightful look into the career of Jim Carrey, while maintaining the high standards similar to other featured articles. The information is frequently referenced with highly reliable sources, and is well written. The article does not go into unneccessary detail, staying completely on-topic. Moreover, the article is expanded through different media including images, giving the article a balanced structure that is extremely engaging and colourful to read. Samgibbs ( talk) 22:45, 29 April 2012 (UTC) reply
Oppose for now. Someone may help with the prose, but if not, it's not ready. - Dank ( push to talk)
Oppose: By no means a bad article, but the prose is certainly rough in places (see above comments), and the lead needs to be more than a roll-call of Carrey's films and awards. As far as I can see this article has never been subject to formal review. It has been compiled by hundreds of different editors (3000+ edits with no single editor contributing more than 90), and looks to me to need some careful shepherding through the review processes before it is ready for FAC nomination. I suggest that peer review is an appropriate route here, and should it be nominated there I will be happy to take on the review and help prepare the article for an FAC resubmission. Brianboulton ( talk) 10:03, 30 April 2012 (UTC) reply
Oppose. Lots of problems.
I agree with Brian: The nominator should have made an effort to obtain feedback on the article before coming to FAC. -- Cryptic C62 · Talk 21:03, 2 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The article was not promoted by GrahamColm 19:01, 4 May 2012 [1].
Jim Carrey ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because I feel that it gives a thoroughly detailed and insightful look into the career of Jim Carrey, while maintaining the high standards similar to other featured articles. The information is frequently referenced with highly reliable sources, and is well written. The article does not go into unneccessary detail, staying completely on-topic. Moreover, the article is expanded through different media including images, giving the article a balanced structure that is extremely engaging and colourful to read. Samgibbs ( talk) 22:45, 29 April 2012 (UTC) reply
Oppose for now. Someone may help with the prose, but if not, it's not ready. - Dank ( push to talk)
Oppose: By no means a bad article, but the prose is certainly rough in places (see above comments), and the lead needs to be more than a roll-call of Carrey's films and awards. As far as I can see this article has never been subject to formal review. It has been compiled by hundreds of different editors (3000+ edits with no single editor contributing more than 90), and looks to me to need some careful shepherding through the review processes before it is ready for FAC nomination. I suggest that peer review is an appropriate route here, and should it be nominated there I will be happy to take on the review and help prepare the article for an FAC resubmission. Brianboulton ( talk) 10:03, 30 April 2012 (UTC) reply
Oppose. Lots of problems.
I agree with Brian: The nominator should have made an effort to obtain feedback on the article before coming to FAC. -- Cryptic C62 · Talk 21:03, 2 May 2012 (UTC) reply