The article was not promoted by GrahamColm 12:14, 3 September 2012 [1].
.hack (video game series) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
It has been a year and a half since the previous FAC. In the intervening time, the article passed GA. I believe it is ready to become a featured article. This article is unique because it discusses a series of four games as if they were one, which is true in a sense. As such, it features the infobox for a single game (because the VG series infobox is missing some relevant parameters) but a review box for a game series (to show review trends across releases). The development section, a sticking point of the previous nomination, is more than double the size it was before the 2nd nom and I believe it represents everything that the internet has to offer about the subject. I merged a stub article on .hack//fragment to this article because I think it is properly part of this series: it features an identical game engine, graphics, story, and gameplay, but with some online components. If there are any other editorial decisions that seem confusing about the article, please feel free to ask. Regards, Axem Titanium ( talk) 21:26, 20 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Comment - what makes this a high-quality reliable source? This? This? Nikkimaria ( talk) 19:24, 21 July 2012 (UTC) reply
-- Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs( talk) 13:43, 4 August 2012 (UTC) reply
Delegate's comment: Spotchecks of sources for verification and close-paraphrasing are needed. Graham Colm ( talk) 09:39, 12 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The article was not promoted by GrahamColm 12:14, 3 September 2012 [1].
.hack (video game series) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
It has been a year and a half since the previous FAC. In the intervening time, the article passed GA. I believe it is ready to become a featured article. This article is unique because it discusses a series of four games as if they were one, which is true in a sense. As such, it features the infobox for a single game (because the VG series infobox is missing some relevant parameters) but a review box for a game series (to show review trends across releases). The development section, a sticking point of the previous nomination, is more than double the size it was before the 2nd nom and I believe it represents everything that the internet has to offer about the subject. I merged a stub article on .hack//fragment to this article because I think it is properly part of this series: it features an identical game engine, graphics, story, and gameplay, but with some online components. If there are any other editorial decisions that seem confusing about the article, please feel free to ask. Regards, Axem Titanium ( talk) 21:26, 20 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Comment - what makes this a high-quality reliable source? This? This? Nikkimaria ( talk) 19:24, 21 July 2012 (UTC) reply
-- Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs( talk) 13:43, 4 August 2012 (UTC) reply
Delegate's comment: Spotchecks of sources for verification and close-paraphrasing are needed. Graham Colm ( talk) 09:39, 12 August 2012 (UTC) reply