Home • Search • Translate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< March 6
March 8 >

March 7

Category:Baseball Card Adventures

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete ( non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 18:57, 15 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: delete per WP:NARROWCAT. Majority of the articles about individual books in the series were deleted/redirected to " Baseball Card Adventures" long ago ( see Afd here). Omnis Scientia ( talk) 23:45, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Stephen F. Austin Lumberjacks football games

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 15#Category:Stephen F. Austin Lumberjacks football games

Category:Zoos by year of disestablishment

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge and delete as nominated. ✗ plicit 04:17, 23 March 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Propose merging:
Nominator's rationale: WP:OCYEAR. There is no need to diffuse zoos by year of disestablishment at the moment. Upmerge to century-level for the 19th and 20th centuries and decade-level for the 21st century. Follows same rationale set forth in Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2024_February_2#Category:Zoos_established_in_1752. – Aidan721 ( talk) 18:29, 19 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Merge as proposed - writing as the creator of Category:Zoos disestablished in 1985, created in existing hierarchy while stub-sorting Southam Zoo in 2020. Pam D 19:34, 19 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Oppose. I think that most people would consider a zoo as a tourist attraction rather than an educational organisation - regardless of the educational potential of such places. OGBC1992 ( talk) 21:42, 19 February 2024 (UTC) reply
There is no tree for tourist attractions by year of disestablishment. This was mentioned by Marcocapelle in the linked discussion regarding the year of establishment tree. – Aidan721 ( talk) 22:48, 19 February 2024 (UTC) reply
True. But it seems to me (although it would inevitably create a lot more work) that that would be a truer categorisation, based on how the public not only view zoos but also use Wikipedia. OGBC1992 ( talk) 08:27, 20 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Merge per nom. Marcocapelle ( talk) 20:30, 19 February 2024 (UTC) reply
    Merge to the century level where we are not keeping the decade; no year-level categories with more than 4 pages. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 20:34, 19 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Merge to Category:Zoos disestablished in DECADE and keep the by existing categories. There are enough article to justify the by decade categories.-- User:Namiba 14:10, 20 February 2024 (UTC) reply
    Not really. The 19th century has just 5 articles. The 20th century has 32 articles. I wouldn't recommend diffusing 32 articles into 10 separate categories (3.2 / decade); it's just not as useful and way narrower. The 21st century has 29 articles (almost 10 / decade) which is much more reasonable to diffuse. – Aidan721 ( talk) 18:53, 20 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl talk 19:58, 27 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl talk 21:05, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Support per nom. No need to have sparely populated year categories. Mason ( talk) 02:39, 8 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Merge/delete as nominated. Agree with Mason. House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 21:01, 21 March 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:British horse racing writers and broadcasters

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: split. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 18:58, 15 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: split per precedent in this earlier discussion. Marcocapelle ( talk) 21:31, 27 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl talk 21:02, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Support per nom. Mason ( talk) 02:38, 8 March 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Palestinian people by descent

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 15#Category:Palestinian people by descent


Category:Nose-mounted intake jet fighter

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete ( non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 19:04, 15 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Non-defining category per WP:TRIVIALCAT, also incorrect terminology. Discussed at project level ( Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aviation#Category:Nose-mounted intake jet fighter) The aviation project's categories have been well established over 20 years. Created in good faith by a new user. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 14:37, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Agreed, per nom. — Cheers, Steelpillow ( Talk) 14:49, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Agreed, idem ditto. Jan olieslagers ( talk) 14:52, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom. Non defining, poorly-worded, and given the inevitable edge-cases, liable to be subjective. AndyTheGrump ( talk) 14:58, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom. Way too specific with incorrect terminology. - ZLEA T\ C 15:17, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply
  • I might have supported something based on single pitot intakes, but this also has (production) Lightnings and Mig-21s in it, where the radar body also acts as a shock cone. Andy Dingley ( talk) 17:12, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:18th century in Thailand by city

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 19:04, 15 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: These are not useful, containing only Chiang Mai. Centuries in Chiang Mai already facilitates navigation to the earlier dates. – Fayenatic London 14:30, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:21st-century Belize politicians

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 19:04, 15 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Per "XXth-century Fooian politicians" precedent, duplicate category. Chaotıċ Enby ( talk · contribs) 11:55, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:1617th-century judges

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 12:43, 16 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. Only one judge in each of these categories, which is unhelpful for navigation. Mason ( talk) 05:55, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:18th-century Maltese judges

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 12:42, 16 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. Only one judge in each of these categories, which is unhelpful for navigation. Mason ( talk) 05:44, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Polish painters of Jewish descent

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 16#Category:Polish painters of Jewish descent

Category:2nd-century novelists

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 19:14, 15 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: upmerge for now. not enough novelists to diffuse by century. It just makes it harder to navigation when you only have one or two people per cat Mason ( talk) 04:43, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:10th-century Danish clergy

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 15#Category:10th-century Danish clergy

Category:People from Seeb

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 19:14, 15 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. There's only one person in each of these categories. Mason ( talk) 01:14, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional game hunters

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 19:13, 15 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: merge, unnecessary distinction, there is no Category:Game hunters either. Marcocapelle ( talk) 01:01, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Support per nom. Mason ( talk) 04:46, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Support merging AHI-3000 ( talk) 21:52, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Palestinian sportspeople by populated place

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 15#Category:Palestinian sportspeople by populated place

Category:Turkmenistan sportspeople by populated place

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 19:13, 15 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: upmerge for now. There's only one category in each of these, which is unhelpful for navigation. Notably: the entire tree of Populated places in Barbados contains only one populated place category. Mason ( talk) 00:52, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2024_March_7&oldid=1215109981"
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< March 6
March 8 >

March 7

Category:Baseball Card Adventures

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete ( non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 18:57, 15 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: delete per WP:NARROWCAT. Majority of the articles about individual books in the series were deleted/redirected to " Baseball Card Adventures" long ago ( see Afd here). Omnis Scientia ( talk) 23:45, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Stephen F. Austin Lumberjacks football games

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 15#Category:Stephen F. Austin Lumberjacks football games

Category:Zoos by year of disestablishment

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge and delete as nominated. ✗ plicit 04:17, 23 March 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Propose merging:
Nominator's rationale: WP:OCYEAR. There is no need to diffuse zoos by year of disestablishment at the moment. Upmerge to century-level for the 19th and 20th centuries and decade-level for the 21st century. Follows same rationale set forth in Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2024_February_2#Category:Zoos_established_in_1752. – Aidan721 ( talk) 18:29, 19 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Merge as proposed - writing as the creator of Category:Zoos disestablished in 1985, created in existing hierarchy while stub-sorting Southam Zoo in 2020. Pam D 19:34, 19 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Oppose. I think that most people would consider a zoo as a tourist attraction rather than an educational organisation - regardless of the educational potential of such places. OGBC1992 ( talk) 21:42, 19 February 2024 (UTC) reply
There is no tree for tourist attractions by year of disestablishment. This was mentioned by Marcocapelle in the linked discussion regarding the year of establishment tree. – Aidan721 ( talk) 22:48, 19 February 2024 (UTC) reply
True. But it seems to me (although it would inevitably create a lot more work) that that would be a truer categorisation, based on how the public not only view zoos but also use Wikipedia. OGBC1992 ( talk) 08:27, 20 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Merge per nom. Marcocapelle ( talk) 20:30, 19 February 2024 (UTC) reply
    Merge to the century level where we are not keeping the decade; no year-level categories with more than 4 pages. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 20:34, 19 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Merge to Category:Zoos disestablished in DECADE and keep the by existing categories. There are enough article to justify the by decade categories.-- User:Namiba 14:10, 20 February 2024 (UTC) reply
    Not really. The 19th century has just 5 articles. The 20th century has 32 articles. I wouldn't recommend diffusing 32 articles into 10 separate categories (3.2 / decade); it's just not as useful and way narrower. The 21st century has 29 articles (almost 10 / decade) which is much more reasonable to diffuse. – Aidan721 ( talk) 18:53, 20 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl talk 19:58, 27 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl talk 21:05, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Support per nom. No need to have sparely populated year categories. Mason ( talk) 02:39, 8 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Merge/delete as nominated. Agree with Mason. House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 21:01, 21 March 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:British horse racing writers and broadcasters

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: split. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 18:58, 15 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: split per precedent in this earlier discussion. Marcocapelle ( talk) 21:31, 27 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl talk 21:02, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Support per nom. Mason ( talk) 02:38, 8 March 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Palestinian people by descent

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 15#Category:Palestinian people by descent


Category:Nose-mounted intake jet fighter

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete ( non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 19:04, 15 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Non-defining category per WP:TRIVIALCAT, also incorrect terminology. Discussed at project level ( Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aviation#Category:Nose-mounted intake jet fighter) The aviation project's categories have been well established over 20 years. Created in good faith by a new user. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 14:37, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Agreed, per nom. — Cheers, Steelpillow ( Talk) 14:49, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Agreed, idem ditto. Jan olieslagers ( talk) 14:52, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom. Non defining, poorly-worded, and given the inevitable edge-cases, liable to be subjective. AndyTheGrump ( talk) 14:58, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom. Way too specific with incorrect terminology. - ZLEA T\ C 15:17, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply
  • I might have supported something based on single pitot intakes, but this also has (production) Lightnings and Mig-21s in it, where the radar body also acts as a shock cone. Andy Dingley ( talk) 17:12, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:18th century in Thailand by city

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 19:04, 15 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: These are not useful, containing only Chiang Mai. Centuries in Chiang Mai already facilitates navigation to the earlier dates. – Fayenatic London 14:30, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:21st-century Belize politicians

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 19:04, 15 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Per "XXth-century Fooian politicians" precedent, duplicate category. Chaotıċ Enby ( talk · contribs) 11:55, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:1617th-century judges

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 12:43, 16 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. Only one judge in each of these categories, which is unhelpful for navigation. Mason ( talk) 05:55, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:18th-century Maltese judges

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 12:42, 16 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. Only one judge in each of these categories, which is unhelpful for navigation. Mason ( talk) 05:44, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Polish painters of Jewish descent

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 16#Category:Polish painters of Jewish descent

Category:2nd-century novelists

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 19:14, 15 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: upmerge for now. not enough novelists to diffuse by century. It just makes it harder to navigation when you only have one or two people per cat Mason ( talk) 04:43, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:10th-century Danish clergy

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 15#Category:10th-century Danish clergy

Category:People from Seeb

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 19:14, 15 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. There's only one person in each of these categories. Mason ( talk) 01:14, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional game hunters

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 19:13, 15 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: merge, unnecessary distinction, there is no Category:Game hunters either. Marcocapelle ( talk) 01:01, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Support per nom. Mason ( talk) 04:46, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Support merging AHI-3000 ( talk) 21:52, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Palestinian sportspeople by populated place

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 15#Category:Palestinian sportspeople by populated place

Category:Turkmenistan sportspeople by populated place

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 19:13, 15 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: upmerge for now. There's only one category in each of these, which is unhelpful for navigation. Notably: the entire tree of Populated places in Barbados contains only one populated place category. Mason ( talk) 00:52, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2024_March_7&oldid=1215109981"

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook




Top Of Page

Home • Search • Translate

© CSE