Category:Items pending permission as of November 2022
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Speedy delete under
WP:G6. This should have been created with {{
SpeedyMaintanceCat}} like its later siblings. –
FayenaticLondon 12:13, 17 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: This is an empty dated maintenance category, it will not be repopulated, so it should be deleted. But @
Liz added {{
emptycat}}, so I won't speedy it. —
Mdaniels5757 (
talk •
contribs) 23:42, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete, the empty sibling categories are being speedily deleted, there is no point in making an exception for this particular category.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 07:12, 17 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Chadian people by occupation and century
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. There's only one category in here, and it's not helpful for navigation
Mason (
talk) 23:24, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Categories by town or city
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Ultimately I would support this, but I think it is too early now, since there are still so many categories by town or city around in lower levels.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 23:14, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment. This rename would facilitate renaming the child categories in the lower levels, as the reasoning still applies. Several of the child categories are being speedied over the next day or so.
Mason (
talk) 23:30, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Ok, in that case by all means merge.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 07:14, 17 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Hungarian forestry engineers
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:merge, a single-article category is not helpful for navigation. This is without prejudice to recreation of the category when a handful articles can be added.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 22:26, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
support per nom.
Mason (
talk) 01:13, 17 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Arab people of Belgian descent
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: It is better to use regional container people categories such as Middle Eastern people or North African people. Per
WP:CATDEF and
WP:EGRS it is better to use ethnic categories only for people who identify with an ethnicity and are consistently defined as Arabs by reliable sources.
Yorkporter (
talk) 21:14, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
support per nom.
Mason (
talk) 01:33, 17 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete. Ethnic categories should be for individuals who are defined as Arabs in reliable sources, not containers for countries.
Place Clichy (
talk) 10:39, 17 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete Incorrect juxtaposition of ethnicity and geography. –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄) 14:22, 17 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Television episodes directed by cast member
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:WP:SMALLCAT newly created for just one person. As always, every university does not automatically get one of these the moment one alumnus of that university has an article to file it in; there would have to be at least five alumni to file in it before a category for them was warranted, and navigation of Wikipedia is not assisted by creating thousands and thousands of one-person microcategories.
Bearcat (
talk) 20:22, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom, without objection to recreate the category when more articles can be added.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 22:35, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Turkish people by location and occupation
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Turkish philosophers by century
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep, it was easy to create and populate the C21 category. –
FayenaticLondon 12:28, 17 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Even so, with two subcategories it is an equally redundant category layer.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 08:11, 18 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fictional Qatari people
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Not useful for navigation. The sole content is redirect
Orry (mascot), mascot of the 2006 Asian Games. Note that the mascot represents an
Arabian oryx, which are not even specific to Qatar but to the Arabian peninsula.
Place Clichy (
talk) 14:32, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Support per nom.
Mason (
talk) 20:39, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
All things considered, this is "just" a redirect. Can't we acknowledge that nothing currently fits in
Category:Fictional Qatari people, move on and leave good-faith editors place redirects in the most appropriate eligible categories per
WP:RCAT? If you ask me, this belongs in
Category:Sports mascots and nowhere else. Mascots aren't really fictional characters, they don't really have a story to them and are more akin to a logotype.
Place Clichy (
talk) 16:57, 19 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Journalists killed while covering the 2023 Israel–Hamas war
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Per
WP:NONDEF. Would also allow the subcategories to be renamed.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 12:26, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Question: Can you please explain why
WP:NONDEF applies here? To me, none of the Definingness test bullets seem to apply to this category. Sorry if I'm missing the obvious; I'm not a regular on CFD. ◅
Sebastian Helm🗨 12:54, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
There is general consensus that "so and so in fiction" allows anything to be included as long as it has a trivial mention of that thing. Thus, they have built up tons of unrelated articles.
There's a broad overall trend of any "in fiction" categories being moved, because "about X" is much more clear on what they should contain.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 12:57, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Thanks. Reducing trivia cruft is a goal I support. One might question whether this naming pattern is really the best possible fix; I prefer the main topic to come first, and only later the “in fiction”. But this is not the place to discuss this, and I trust you that there's general consensus to name such cats "Fiction about ...". If that is so, please add that to
WP:NONDEF, ideally with the rationale you just gave, so others understand what you mean when you refer to it. You might also want to mention the analogy to
Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Trivia sections. ◅
Sebastian Helm🗨 14:21, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Support, the proposed rename emphasizes that physics should be a defining characteristic of articles in the category.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 20:29, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Support per nom and Marcocapelle
Mason (
talk) 22:18, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Support We should get around to renaming all of the categories of this type. –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄) 14:25, 17 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Fictional people by ethnicity
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Merge Per
WP:NARROWCAT. As the guideline says, "if an article is in category "A" and in category "B" - a category A and B does not necessarily need to be created for this article". This is clear category clutter.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 13:00, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Merge per nom
Mason (
talk) 20:40, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: This category largely appears to refer to social media as a modern or sci-fi concept rather than people's reputations in general. I suggest merging per
WP:OVERLAPCAT.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 09:16, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Merge per Marcocapelle; it has not been established that there should be a fiction category for
reputation in general. –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄) 14:31, 17 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Violence in video games
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: What exactly this category refers to is unclear. It appears to contain video games people arbitrarily think are violent, and a few controversies about video game violence. I think it is unnecessary and
WP:SUBJECTIVECAT, as
Category:Video game controversies works well enough.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 09:09, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete, per the nomination. Subjective and unnecessary.
🌿MtBotany (
talk) 17:48, 23 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete, violence occurs too frequently in (any kind of) fiction, it is not a clear differentiator.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 22:18, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete There is a whole spectrum of fictional violece, from the cartoony to the gory. –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄) 14:28, 17 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Assyrian Egyptian
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:delete, the articles are about religion, not about diaspora, for background see
Chaldean Catholic Church.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 07:11, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The point of the nomination is that these articles would not belong in
Category:Iraqi diaspora in Egypt. "Chaldean" is just the name of the church in this case.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 22:21, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Notes: The two articles now have links to each other. If the merge happens,
Category:Eastern Catholicism in Egypt will be the lowest common parent, which is considerably broader e.g. Coptic Catholic, Armenian Catholic, Maronite Catholic. –
FayenaticLondon 12:43, 17 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Indo-European archaeology
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Split per nom. The link between language families and archaeology has been much challenged.
Place Clichy (
talk) 15:23, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Split per nom. Geography is definitely easier to understand for users searching for an article, and far less likely to be controversial, fuzzy, or frequently needing to be changed whenever someone publishes a new hypothesis.--
Andrew Lancaster (
talk) 16:25, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Which is fine because
Proto-Indo-Europeans is a hypothesis, we do not have confirmed archaeological findings of them.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 08:23, 18 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:People educated at Licensed Victuallers' School
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: LVS Ascot is the current name of the school which was formerly known as formerly known as Licensed Victuallers' School. I erroneously thought that doing a manual transfer across followed by a redirect would be ok - apologies. --
Uhooep (
talk) 19:55, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Items pending permission as of November 2022
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Speedy delete under
WP:G6. This should have been created with {{
SpeedyMaintanceCat}} like its later siblings. –
FayenaticLondon 12:13, 17 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: This is an empty dated maintenance category, it will not be repopulated, so it should be deleted. But @
Liz added {{
emptycat}}, so I won't speedy it. —
Mdaniels5757 (
talk •
contribs) 23:42, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete, the empty sibling categories are being speedily deleted, there is no point in making an exception for this particular category.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 07:12, 17 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Chadian people by occupation and century
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. There's only one category in here, and it's not helpful for navigation
Mason (
talk) 23:24, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Categories by town or city
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Ultimately I would support this, but I think it is too early now, since there are still so many categories by town or city around in lower levels.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 23:14, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment. This rename would facilitate renaming the child categories in the lower levels, as the reasoning still applies. Several of the child categories are being speedied over the next day or so.
Mason (
talk) 23:30, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Ok, in that case by all means merge.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 07:14, 17 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Hungarian forestry engineers
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:merge, a single-article category is not helpful for navigation. This is without prejudice to recreation of the category when a handful articles can be added.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 22:26, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
support per nom.
Mason (
talk) 01:13, 17 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Arab people of Belgian descent
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: It is better to use regional container people categories such as Middle Eastern people or North African people. Per
WP:CATDEF and
WP:EGRS it is better to use ethnic categories only for people who identify with an ethnicity and are consistently defined as Arabs by reliable sources.
Yorkporter (
talk) 21:14, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
support per nom.
Mason (
talk) 01:33, 17 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete. Ethnic categories should be for individuals who are defined as Arabs in reliable sources, not containers for countries.
Place Clichy (
talk) 10:39, 17 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete Incorrect juxtaposition of ethnicity and geography. –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄) 14:22, 17 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Television episodes directed by cast member
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:WP:SMALLCAT newly created for just one person. As always, every university does not automatically get one of these the moment one alumnus of that university has an article to file it in; there would have to be at least five alumni to file in it before a category for them was warranted, and navigation of Wikipedia is not assisted by creating thousands and thousands of one-person microcategories.
Bearcat (
talk) 20:22, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom, without objection to recreate the category when more articles can be added.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 22:35, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Turkish people by location and occupation
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Turkish philosophers by century
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep, it was easy to create and populate the C21 category. –
FayenaticLondon 12:28, 17 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Even so, with two subcategories it is an equally redundant category layer.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 08:11, 18 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fictional Qatari people
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Not useful for navigation. The sole content is redirect
Orry (mascot), mascot of the 2006 Asian Games. Note that the mascot represents an
Arabian oryx, which are not even specific to Qatar but to the Arabian peninsula.
Place Clichy (
talk) 14:32, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Support per nom.
Mason (
talk) 20:39, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
All things considered, this is "just" a redirect. Can't we acknowledge that nothing currently fits in
Category:Fictional Qatari people, move on and leave good-faith editors place redirects in the most appropriate eligible categories per
WP:RCAT? If you ask me, this belongs in
Category:Sports mascots and nowhere else. Mascots aren't really fictional characters, they don't really have a story to them and are more akin to a logotype.
Place Clichy (
talk) 16:57, 19 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Journalists killed while covering the 2023 Israel–Hamas war
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Per
WP:NONDEF. Would also allow the subcategories to be renamed.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 12:26, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Question: Can you please explain why
WP:NONDEF applies here? To me, none of the Definingness test bullets seem to apply to this category. Sorry if I'm missing the obvious; I'm not a regular on CFD. ◅
Sebastian Helm🗨 12:54, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
There is general consensus that "so and so in fiction" allows anything to be included as long as it has a trivial mention of that thing. Thus, they have built up tons of unrelated articles.
There's a broad overall trend of any "in fiction" categories being moved, because "about X" is much more clear on what they should contain.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 12:57, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Thanks. Reducing trivia cruft is a goal I support. One might question whether this naming pattern is really the best possible fix; I prefer the main topic to come first, and only later the “in fiction”. But this is not the place to discuss this, and I trust you that there's general consensus to name such cats "Fiction about ...". If that is so, please add that to
WP:NONDEF, ideally with the rationale you just gave, so others understand what you mean when you refer to it. You might also want to mention the analogy to
Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Trivia sections. ◅
Sebastian Helm🗨 14:21, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Support, the proposed rename emphasizes that physics should be a defining characteristic of articles in the category.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 20:29, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Support per nom and Marcocapelle
Mason (
talk) 22:18, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Support We should get around to renaming all of the categories of this type. –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄) 14:25, 17 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Fictional people by ethnicity
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Merge Per
WP:NARROWCAT. As the guideline says, "if an article is in category "A" and in category "B" - a category A and B does not necessarily need to be created for this article". This is clear category clutter.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 13:00, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Merge per nom
Mason (
talk) 20:40, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: This category largely appears to refer to social media as a modern or sci-fi concept rather than people's reputations in general. I suggest merging per
WP:OVERLAPCAT.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 09:16, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Merge per Marcocapelle; it has not been established that there should be a fiction category for
reputation in general. –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄) 14:31, 17 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Violence in video games
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: What exactly this category refers to is unclear. It appears to contain video games people arbitrarily think are violent, and a few controversies about video game violence. I think it is unnecessary and
WP:SUBJECTIVECAT, as
Category:Video game controversies works well enough.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 09:09, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete, per the nomination. Subjective and unnecessary.
🌿MtBotany (
talk) 17:48, 23 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete, violence occurs too frequently in (any kind of) fiction, it is not a clear differentiator.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 22:18, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete There is a whole spectrum of fictional violece, from the cartoony to the gory. –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄) 14:28, 17 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Assyrian Egyptian
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:delete, the articles are about religion, not about diaspora, for background see
Chaldean Catholic Church.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 07:11, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The point of the nomination is that these articles would not belong in
Category:Iraqi diaspora in Egypt. "Chaldean" is just the name of the church in this case.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 22:21, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Notes: The two articles now have links to each other. If the merge happens,
Category:Eastern Catholicism in Egypt will be the lowest common parent, which is considerably broader e.g. Coptic Catholic, Armenian Catholic, Maronite Catholic. –
FayenaticLondon 12:43, 17 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Indo-European archaeology
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Split per nom. The link between language families and archaeology has been much challenged.
Place Clichy (
talk) 15:23, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Split per nom. Geography is definitely easier to understand for users searching for an article, and far less likely to be controversial, fuzzy, or frequently needing to be changed whenever someone publishes a new hypothesis.--
Andrew Lancaster (
talk) 16:25, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Which is fine because
Proto-Indo-Europeans is a hypothesis, we do not have confirmed archaeological findings of them.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 08:23, 18 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:People educated at Licensed Victuallers' School
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: LVS Ascot is the current name of the school which was formerly known as formerly known as Licensed Victuallers' School. I erroneously thought that doing a manual transfer across followed by a redirect would be ok - apologies. --
Uhooep (
talk) 19:55, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.