Home • Search • Translate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< December 18
December 20 >

December 19

Category:Anti-anarchism in Japan

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: dual merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 12:20, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: This category has near-complete topical overlap with its parent, Category:Anarchism in Japan. The parent topic is sufficient for addressing the history of anarchism (and by extension, anti-anarchism) in Japan. czar 23:06, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Question: Shouldn't it be upmerged then? Mason ( talk) 00:14, 20 December 2023 (UTC) reply
They were already in the parent category at the time. But per the below edit, now they'd have to be dual-merged. czar 04:13, 22 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People from the British Central Africa Protectorate

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 27#Category:People from the British Central Africa Protectorate

Category:Emigrants from the Grand Duchy of Tuscany to France

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 13:23, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Dual merge, these categories are a small intersection that doesn't help navigation. In the same spirit as Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2023_May_7#Emigrants_from_former_countries Mason ( talk) 22:09, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Support per nom, with regret, since Italian is rather anachronistic. Marcocapelle ( talk) 05:46, 20 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Support -- Italy was not a nation at the time, but the term was in contemporary use, e.g. by British Customs. Peterkingiron ( talk) 17:57, 25 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional intergovernmental organization personnel

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 13:23, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: WP:NARROWCAT made, predictably, by a blocked user. Unnecessary. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 22:07, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Merge Only two subcategories and no top-level articles. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 02:01, 20 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Merge, redundant category layer with only two subcategories. Marcocapelle ( talk) 05:47, 20 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional nihilists

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 13:24, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: delete, not a defining characteristic. Marcocapelle ( talk) 21:19, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete I don't think it's defining - I can see the idea of someone becoming a villain, criminal or what have you because of a nihilistic perspective, but that in itself is overly vague and incredibly subjective. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 21:31, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional torturers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 13:24, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Delete per WP:NONDEF. This is not defining, or a character could be part of a more defining category (such as executioners, spies, soldiers or what have you). ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 21:08, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete, it is an aspect of the story, not a defining characteristic of the characters. Marcocapelle ( talk) 21:21, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete the ones I checked had verifiability issues, so this is clearly attracting many inappropriate entries though it may be defining for some fictional characters. ( t · c) buidhe 08:11, 20 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional illeists

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 13:24, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Can this possibly be defining? It's generally just a character quirk, if that. It is far too minor to be a defining trait for a fictional character. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 20:54, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Pirates Constructible Strategy Game

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 13:26, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Contains only the main article and a redirect to that article. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 20:02, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • I removed the redirect, because even if the category would be kept the redirect would be unneeded in it. Now it simply becomes a matter of WP:C2F. Marcocapelle ( talk) 20:54, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People from Midtown Manhattan

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 13:28, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Not really necessary. Midtown is a collection of neighborhoods in central Manhattan. It isn't a neighborhood itself. Omnis Scientia ( talk) 19:58, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Comment: there were a few people whom I've moved to the appropriate subcategories in Category:People from Manhattan. Omnis Scientia ( talk) 20:02, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Merge per nom. Marcocapelle ( talk) 20:56, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
    merge per nom Mason ( talk) 22:32, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Merge as this category now only contains subcategories. However, this is emphatically not per nom, since our article on Midtown Manhattan clearly says that this is also a neighborhood, and "Midtown" refers both to a central business district and to the wider collection of neighborhoods around that district. At some point in the future, a new subcategory may need to be created for people from the central business district, including Charles K. Eagle, but this is outside the scope of this CfD. Epicgenius ( talk) 15:28, 20 December 2023 (UTC) (Edited. Epicgenius ( talk) 21:35, 20 December 2023 (UTC)) reply
    @ Epicgenius, Midtown Manhattan is a district with several neighborhoods within it. Since there are categories for New York City for boroughs Category:People from New York City by borough and neighborhoods Category:People from New York City by neighborhood, it would not make sense to create ANOTHER category for people who live in business districts in New York City (see Category:Central business districts in New York City) when the other two cover them sufficiently. Omnis Scientia ( talk) 10:19, 23 December 2023 (UTC) reply
    @ Omnis Scientia, yes, Midtown Manhattan can be considered to consist of several neighborhoods. This includes the neighborhood roughly bounded by Eighth Avenue, 59th Street, Park/Lexington Avenue, and 42nd Street. With the exception of the blocks surrounding Times Square, this area doesn't really have a separate identity and is known merely as "Midtown Manhattan". This makes up the central business district I was talking about. There is no category for this area, but other midtown neighborhoods such as Hell's Kitchen and Chelsea have their own subcategories.
    Since there is no category for people from the area I was talking about, I am not convinced that "it would not make sense to create another category" for this area. If there exist categories for people from the Upper West Side and Upper East Side (which are larger), I think it makes sense to have a category for people from central Midtown, for greater precision. Epicgenius ( talk) 15:46, 23 December 2023 (UTC) reply
    @ Epicgenius, Upper West Side and Upper East Side are explicitly labled as neighborhoods. Meanwhile, Midtown Manhattan's article lists neighborhoods within it. Also, there are unofficial boundaries on maps in the three articles and the Midtown Manhattan one shows it is a collection of neighborhoods. Clearly not the same. Omnis Scientia ( talk) 15:54, 23 December 2023 (UTC) reply
    Okay, but you still haven't addressed my point that there is, at present, no category for people in the central portion of Midtown. I'm sorry, but I'm still not seeing why this particular part of Midtown should not have a category.
    Also, if you are using the maps in the infoboxes as a basis for nominating this category for deletion, it's worth noting that the maps are simplified. Both the UWS and UES have sub-neighborhoods, but these were all consolidated into one shape when the maps were created. The UES contains sub-neighborhoods such as Yorkville and Lenox Hill, while the UWS includes Lincoln Square and Manhattan Valley. Epicgenius ( talk) 15:57, 23 December 2023 (UTC) reply
    I'm assuming it is because they partially overlap since neighborhoods tend not to have boundaries. And there are former historic neighborhoods as well. I should also add, I'm going by the Template:Manhattan which lists Midtown as a section and the remaining you have listed as neighborhoods.
    Additionally, not every neighborhood in the New York City has a category for people. Omnis Scientia ( talk) 23:35, 24 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Lists of festivals in the United States by state or region

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename.
Nominator's rationale: Adding to older nom Mason ( talk) 19:36, 17 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: rename per actual content, "region" is redundant. Marcocapelle ( talk) 06:45, 11 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Support in principle, but I think renaming it to be Category:Lists of festivals in the United States by state or territory would be capture the broader intent and mean that Puerto rico and other territories could be added if they were to ever exist Mason ( talk) 22:34, 11 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting in light of the late addition.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, House Blaster talk 19:07, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Rename with territory in both instances (it's currently specified only in the music category and not in the lists one). Even if the likes of Puerto Rico and Guam and the US Virgin Islands don't already have lists yet, the category should be consistent with other like categories so that PR and Guam and USVI lists can be added to them, instead of having to go through another round of follow-up renaming, when somebody gets around to creating them. Bearcat ( talk) 16:50, 20 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Rename both per Bearcat. – Aidan721 ( talk) 03:54, 22 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Sports coaches

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 27#Sports coaches

Category:Immigrants to the South African Republic

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 13:31, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: The political regime isn't defining and effectively this category serves to remove people from more specific categories. For example, https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Harry_Struben&oldid=1189382104 Mason ( talk) 23:09, 11 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, House Blaster talk 19:04, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Oppose -- This refers to the Africaans republic also known as Transvaal, existing 1852-1902. This would need to be distinguished from settlers in Cape Colony and Natal, which were British colonies. Peterkingiron ( talk) 18:01, 25 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Boston sportscasters

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Apparently all already in merge target suncats. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 13:33, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Category seems trivial. Additionally, I don't see any similar category for other cities. Omnis Scientia ( talk) 18:55, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Manually merge, much of the content will already be in other subcategories of Category:American sports announcers. Marcocapelle ( talk) 20:59, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
    merge per nom Mason ( talk) 22:33, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Merge per nom (with caution not to duplicate-categorize people who are already in other subcategories of the target, per Marcocapelle). The thing about broadcasters is that they can move around from one city to another over the course of their careers, so if we catted them for individual city-worked-in, they could potentially have to be bloated into numerous city broadcaster categories. So individual city just isn't a useful point of categorization here. Bearcat ( talk) 16:53, 20 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

X in fiction VI

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 13:34, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Conversion from X in fiction to Fiction about X, as this must be a defining trait. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 18:22, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

X in fiction V

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 13:35, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Conversion from X in fiction to Fiction about X, as this must be a defining trait. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 18:08, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Rename per nom. Marcocapelle ( talk) 21:00, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
    support per nom. Mason ( talk) 22:33, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Question: Should some end with plurals? crises, burglaries, invasions, robberies Fuddle ( talk) 03:43, 22 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:French colonial empire war fiction

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 13:48, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary intermediate layer. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 17:55, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Merge, redundant category layer with only two subcategories. Marcocapelle ( talk) 21:02, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
    support per nom. Mason ( talk) 22:33, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Older versions of cartoon characters

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete * Pppery * it has begun... 23:44, 30 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Rename per actual contents and for being unnecessarily specific. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 17:50, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete This and Category:Child versions of cartoon characters, which you should consider nominating. This category is akin to a "Cartoons with flashbacks" category. The idea of flashbacks in fiction is not defining, and while they may feature things like time travel they should be evaluated separately. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 17:59, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
    Added. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 18:12, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
    @ LaundryPizza03, any opinion on deletion? Qwerfjkl talk 13:49, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
    No opinion. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 00:32, 28 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete both. Characters (well, most of them) age in each episode/novel/chapter/page. Categorizing every episode/novel/etc. except the first (for older versions) and last (for younger versions) respectively is not useful; any time "cutoff" (e,g, must be at least five years in the future) would be arbitrary. Zxcvbnm also makes a good argument. House Blaster talk 22:24, 28 December 2023 (UTC) reply
    Delete per nom. Omnis Scientia ( talk) 18:51, 29 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional female domestic workers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 13:49, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Dual merge to Category:Fictional domestic workers, and Category:Fictional females by occupation for the subcategories. There is no obvious need for this WP:NARROWCAT created by a blocked user. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 17:45, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional male domestic workers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 13:51, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Dual merge to Category:Fictional domestic workers, and Category:Fictional males by occupation for the subcategories. There is no obvious need for this WP:NARROWCAT created by a blocked user. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 17:43, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
No merge unless Category:Fictional female domestic workers is merged as well. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 17:45, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
@ LaundryPizza03: I was about to nominate it above, I guess this is a case of jumping the gun slightly :P ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 17:46, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Merge both per nom. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 17:47, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Works by setting

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 27#Category:Works by setting

Category:Turkish arms traffickers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 13:53, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Only two articles, with no other nationality subcategories in the parent. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 17:25, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional characters by beliefs or ideologies

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 27#Category:Fictional characters by beliefs or ideologies

Category:21st-century African-American sportspeople

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 27#Category:21st-century African-American sportspeople

Category:Fictional yogis

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 13:57, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Contains only Dhalsim. It can possibly be merged somewhere, but I am not sure where. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 17:13, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional deserters

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 13:58, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Only has one member. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 17:09, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Oppose AHI-3000 ( talk) 17:56, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Nations at the Maccabiah

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 27#Category:Nations at the Maccabiah

Category:Jewish organizations based in New Jersey

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: triple merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 14:01, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Such organizations are not (as far as I can tell) divided by state AND is very small. There were two pages which were, in fact, based in New York City which I've moved accordingly. Omnis Scientia ( talk) 16:26, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional natural scientists

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge all. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 14:02, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: WP:NARROWCAT that only contains two smaller categories. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 16:10, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Merge we don't need to divide Category:Fictional scientists any further than by occupation. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 17:04, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Oppose. By the way, Category:Fictional characters by occupation looks like a gigantic chaotic mess right now. AHI-3000 ( talk) 17:55, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
I have subcategorized dozens of categories already, so it was an even more chaotic mess before. Though it should be said that a lot of the categories were originally in the right place before they were removed to go into the now-deleted categories and now have to be recategorized. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 18:07, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
And I still feel like we need Category:Fictional people in law enforcement as a layer. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 18:53, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Deleting Category:Fictional characters by occupational types was one thing, but I think we should've kept most of the subcategories within it, especially the subcategories for illegal occupations, judicial/penal system, law enforcement, military, etc. And regarding these scientist subcategories, I think we also at least should've kept "Fictional scientists by field" to contain them. AHI-3000 ( talk) 20:52, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Jewish Community Center

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Jewish Community Centers. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 14:05, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Merge category; basically serves the same purpose. WP:OVERLAP probably applies here. Omnis Scientia ( talk) 15:42, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional characters who break the fourth wall

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 27#Category:Fictional characters who break the fourth wall

Category:Fictional nuclear engineers

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 27#Category:Fictional nuclear engineers

Category:Time travel in Star Trek

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 27#Category:Time travel in Star Trek

X in fiction IV

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 14:09, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Conversion from X in fiction to Fiction about X, as this must be a defining trait. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 09:16, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Time travel and multiple reality role-playing games

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: manual merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 14:09, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Mixture of time travel and multiverse concepts. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 09:13, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Multiple time paths in fiction

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 14:13, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Undefined mixture of multiverse and time travel concepts; for example, Final Destination and The Minority Report are about precognition, while Category:Time loop is self-explanatory. The entries and subcategories are, or should be, in other branches of Category:Time in fiction or Category:Parallel universes in fiction, but the merge targets are not necessarily the same in all cases. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 08:42, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Per nom while adding to any other category that may be relevant. This, however, is overly vague to be a category. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 13:28, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Neurotrauma

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 27#Category:Neurotrauma

Category:History of Chitral

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 27#Category:History of Chitral

Category:Ancient Greeks by death

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 27#Category:Ancient Greeks by death

Category:Fiction about mermaids

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 16:52, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: I recently closed this discussion to move Category:Fictional mermen and mermaids to Category:Fictional merfolk, and to split other entries into a new category, Category:Fiction about merfolk. However, Category:Fiction about mermaids already exists as the parent to "Fictional merfolk". I'd like to suggest that "Fiction about mermaids" be renamed and the split redirected to the newly renamed category instead. bibliomaniac 1 5 05:51, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Support per nom. Mason ( talk) 06:01, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Support for the sake of consistency with the Fictional merfolk category. AHI-3000 ( talk) 18:33, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Support per precedent. Marcocapelle ( talk) 06:57, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Oppose Category is primarily for mermaids, not other merpeople. InfiniteNexus ( talk) 19:43, 21 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Support There is a gender-neutral term available. After this, we can probably use WP:CFDS for the rest. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 19:11, 22 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Suburban Minneapolis School Districts

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 27#Category:Suburban Minneapolis School Districts

Category:Masonic buildings in Norway

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 16:52, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SMALLCAT (1 article). It's already in the Norway subcategory. User:Namiba 01:58, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Support per nom. Mason ( talk) 06:00, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Merge for now, without objection to recreate the category when it can be better populated. Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:10, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional characters with neurological or psychological disorders

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: combine to Category:Fictional characters with mental disorders (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 18:01, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Propose merging or renaming these related categories into each other:
Nominator's rationale: So we have this set of four categories connected together, which are all about mental/neurological/psychiatric/psychological disorders. I don't have a formal plan yet, but I think we can all agree that at least one or more of these categories are redundant or superfluous. They certainly need to be merged and simplified somehow. AHI-3000 ( talk) 02:04, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Update: per LaundryPizza03's suggestion, my current proposal is to keep Category:Fictional characters with mental disorders, and merge the other three categories into it. Any subcategories that are not about mental disorders should be removed. AHI-3000 ( talk) 06:55, 21 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Support in principle: I think that we should model the names after the people with disabilities categories. Mason ( talk) 06:01, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Going by Smasongarrison's suggestion, we should merge all to Category:Fictional characters with mental disorders, which is the fictional counterpart of Category:People with mental disorders, and then purge subcategories that are not for mental disorders. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 08:22, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
I like Laundry's suggestion. If the real-life counterpart is about people with mental disorders, then the combined fictional character category should follow a similar naming pattern. AHI-3000 ( talk) 18:40, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional characters with density control abilities

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 27#Category:Fictional characters with density control abilities

Category:Uzbeksitan navigational boxes

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy delete. CSD C1, G7 Liz Read! Talk! 03:58, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Misspelled, duplicate to Category:Uzbekistan navigational boxes. Recategorize contents to the correctly spelled category and delete. DB1729 talk 00:18, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Sorry, my bad. I've recategorized the contents of the cat with the typo. It should now be deleted. Nataev talk 02:53, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2023_December_19&oldid=1192721760"
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< December 18
December 20 >

December 19

Category:Anti-anarchism in Japan

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: dual merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 12:20, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: This category has near-complete topical overlap with its parent, Category:Anarchism in Japan. The parent topic is sufficient for addressing the history of anarchism (and by extension, anti-anarchism) in Japan. czar 23:06, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Question: Shouldn't it be upmerged then? Mason ( talk) 00:14, 20 December 2023 (UTC) reply
They were already in the parent category at the time. But per the below edit, now they'd have to be dual-merged. czar 04:13, 22 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People from the British Central Africa Protectorate

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 27#Category:People from the British Central Africa Protectorate

Category:Emigrants from the Grand Duchy of Tuscany to France

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 13:23, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Dual merge, these categories are a small intersection that doesn't help navigation. In the same spirit as Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2023_May_7#Emigrants_from_former_countries Mason ( talk) 22:09, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Support per nom, with regret, since Italian is rather anachronistic. Marcocapelle ( talk) 05:46, 20 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Support -- Italy was not a nation at the time, but the term was in contemporary use, e.g. by British Customs. Peterkingiron ( talk) 17:57, 25 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional intergovernmental organization personnel

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 13:23, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: WP:NARROWCAT made, predictably, by a blocked user. Unnecessary. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 22:07, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Merge Only two subcategories and no top-level articles. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 02:01, 20 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Merge, redundant category layer with only two subcategories. Marcocapelle ( talk) 05:47, 20 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional nihilists

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 13:24, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: delete, not a defining characteristic. Marcocapelle ( talk) 21:19, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete I don't think it's defining - I can see the idea of someone becoming a villain, criminal or what have you because of a nihilistic perspective, but that in itself is overly vague and incredibly subjective. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 21:31, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional torturers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 13:24, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Delete per WP:NONDEF. This is not defining, or a character could be part of a more defining category (such as executioners, spies, soldiers or what have you). ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 21:08, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete, it is an aspect of the story, not a defining characteristic of the characters. Marcocapelle ( talk) 21:21, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete the ones I checked had verifiability issues, so this is clearly attracting many inappropriate entries though it may be defining for some fictional characters. ( t · c) buidhe 08:11, 20 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional illeists

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 13:24, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Can this possibly be defining? It's generally just a character quirk, if that. It is far too minor to be a defining trait for a fictional character. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 20:54, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Pirates Constructible Strategy Game

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 13:26, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Contains only the main article and a redirect to that article. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 20:02, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • I removed the redirect, because even if the category would be kept the redirect would be unneeded in it. Now it simply becomes a matter of WP:C2F. Marcocapelle ( talk) 20:54, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People from Midtown Manhattan

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 13:28, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Not really necessary. Midtown is a collection of neighborhoods in central Manhattan. It isn't a neighborhood itself. Omnis Scientia ( talk) 19:58, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Comment: there were a few people whom I've moved to the appropriate subcategories in Category:People from Manhattan. Omnis Scientia ( talk) 20:02, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Merge per nom. Marcocapelle ( talk) 20:56, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
    merge per nom Mason ( talk) 22:32, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Merge as this category now only contains subcategories. However, this is emphatically not per nom, since our article on Midtown Manhattan clearly says that this is also a neighborhood, and "Midtown" refers both to a central business district and to the wider collection of neighborhoods around that district. At some point in the future, a new subcategory may need to be created for people from the central business district, including Charles K. Eagle, but this is outside the scope of this CfD. Epicgenius ( talk) 15:28, 20 December 2023 (UTC) (Edited. Epicgenius ( talk) 21:35, 20 December 2023 (UTC)) reply
    @ Epicgenius, Midtown Manhattan is a district with several neighborhoods within it. Since there are categories for New York City for boroughs Category:People from New York City by borough and neighborhoods Category:People from New York City by neighborhood, it would not make sense to create ANOTHER category for people who live in business districts in New York City (see Category:Central business districts in New York City) when the other two cover them sufficiently. Omnis Scientia ( talk) 10:19, 23 December 2023 (UTC) reply
    @ Omnis Scientia, yes, Midtown Manhattan can be considered to consist of several neighborhoods. This includes the neighborhood roughly bounded by Eighth Avenue, 59th Street, Park/Lexington Avenue, and 42nd Street. With the exception of the blocks surrounding Times Square, this area doesn't really have a separate identity and is known merely as "Midtown Manhattan". This makes up the central business district I was talking about. There is no category for this area, but other midtown neighborhoods such as Hell's Kitchen and Chelsea have their own subcategories.
    Since there is no category for people from the area I was talking about, I am not convinced that "it would not make sense to create another category" for this area. If there exist categories for people from the Upper West Side and Upper East Side (which are larger), I think it makes sense to have a category for people from central Midtown, for greater precision. Epicgenius ( talk) 15:46, 23 December 2023 (UTC) reply
    @ Epicgenius, Upper West Side and Upper East Side are explicitly labled as neighborhoods. Meanwhile, Midtown Manhattan's article lists neighborhoods within it. Also, there are unofficial boundaries on maps in the three articles and the Midtown Manhattan one shows it is a collection of neighborhoods. Clearly not the same. Omnis Scientia ( talk) 15:54, 23 December 2023 (UTC) reply
    Okay, but you still haven't addressed my point that there is, at present, no category for people in the central portion of Midtown. I'm sorry, but I'm still not seeing why this particular part of Midtown should not have a category.
    Also, if you are using the maps in the infoboxes as a basis for nominating this category for deletion, it's worth noting that the maps are simplified. Both the UWS and UES have sub-neighborhoods, but these were all consolidated into one shape when the maps were created. The UES contains sub-neighborhoods such as Yorkville and Lenox Hill, while the UWS includes Lincoln Square and Manhattan Valley. Epicgenius ( talk) 15:57, 23 December 2023 (UTC) reply
    I'm assuming it is because they partially overlap since neighborhoods tend not to have boundaries. And there are former historic neighborhoods as well. I should also add, I'm going by the Template:Manhattan which lists Midtown as a section and the remaining you have listed as neighborhoods.
    Additionally, not every neighborhood in the New York City has a category for people. Omnis Scientia ( talk) 23:35, 24 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Lists of festivals in the United States by state or region

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename.
Nominator's rationale: Adding to older nom Mason ( talk) 19:36, 17 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: rename per actual content, "region" is redundant. Marcocapelle ( talk) 06:45, 11 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Support in principle, but I think renaming it to be Category:Lists of festivals in the United States by state or territory would be capture the broader intent and mean that Puerto rico and other territories could be added if they were to ever exist Mason ( talk) 22:34, 11 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting in light of the late addition.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, House Blaster talk 19:07, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Rename with territory in both instances (it's currently specified only in the music category and not in the lists one). Even if the likes of Puerto Rico and Guam and the US Virgin Islands don't already have lists yet, the category should be consistent with other like categories so that PR and Guam and USVI lists can be added to them, instead of having to go through another round of follow-up renaming, when somebody gets around to creating them. Bearcat ( talk) 16:50, 20 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Rename both per Bearcat. – Aidan721 ( talk) 03:54, 22 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Sports coaches

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 27#Sports coaches

Category:Immigrants to the South African Republic

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 13:31, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: The political regime isn't defining and effectively this category serves to remove people from more specific categories. For example, https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Harry_Struben&oldid=1189382104 Mason ( talk) 23:09, 11 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, House Blaster talk 19:04, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Oppose -- This refers to the Africaans republic also known as Transvaal, existing 1852-1902. This would need to be distinguished from settlers in Cape Colony and Natal, which were British colonies. Peterkingiron ( talk) 18:01, 25 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Boston sportscasters

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Apparently all already in merge target suncats. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 13:33, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Category seems trivial. Additionally, I don't see any similar category for other cities. Omnis Scientia ( talk) 18:55, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Manually merge, much of the content will already be in other subcategories of Category:American sports announcers. Marcocapelle ( talk) 20:59, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
    merge per nom Mason ( talk) 22:33, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Merge per nom (with caution not to duplicate-categorize people who are already in other subcategories of the target, per Marcocapelle). The thing about broadcasters is that they can move around from one city to another over the course of their careers, so if we catted them for individual city-worked-in, they could potentially have to be bloated into numerous city broadcaster categories. So individual city just isn't a useful point of categorization here. Bearcat ( talk) 16:53, 20 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

X in fiction VI

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 13:34, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Conversion from X in fiction to Fiction about X, as this must be a defining trait. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 18:22, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

X in fiction V

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 13:35, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Conversion from X in fiction to Fiction about X, as this must be a defining trait. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 18:08, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Rename per nom. Marcocapelle ( talk) 21:00, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
    support per nom. Mason ( talk) 22:33, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Question: Should some end with plurals? crises, burglaries, invasions, robberies Fuddle ( talk) 03:43, 22 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:French colonial empire war fiction

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 13:48, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary intermediate layer. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 17:55, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Merge, redundant category layer with only two subcategories. Marcocapelle ( talk) 21:02, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
    support per nom. Mason ( talk) 22:33, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Older versions of cartoon characters

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete * Pppery * it has begun... 23:44, 30 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Rename per actual contents and for being unnecessarily specific. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 17:50, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete This and Category:Child versions of cartoon characters, which you should consider nominating. This category is akin to a "Cartoons with flashbacks" category. The idea of flashbacks in fiction is not defining, and while they may feature things like time travel they should be evaluated separately. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 17:59, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
    Added. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 18:12, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
    @ LaundryPizza03, any opinion on deletion? Qwerfjkl talk 13:49, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
    No opinion. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 00:32, 28 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete both. Characters (well, most of them) age in each episode/novel/chapter/page. Categorizing every episode/novel/etc. except the first (for older versions) and last (for younger versions) respectively is not useful; any time "cutoff" (e,g, must be at least five years in the future) would be arbitrary. Zxcvbnm also makes a good argument. House Blaster talk 22:24, 28 December 2023 (UTC) reply
    Delete per nom. Omnis Scientia ( talk) 18:51, 29 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional female domestic workers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 13:49, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Dual merge to Category:Fictional domestic workers, and Category:Fictional females by occupation for the subcategories. There is no obvious need for this WP:NARROWCAT created by a blocked user. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 17:45, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional male domestic workers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 13:51, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Dual merge to Category:Fictional domestic workers, and Category:Fictional males by occupation for the subcategories. There is no obvious need for this WP:NARROWCAT created by a blocked user. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 17:43, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
No merge unless Category:Fictional female domestic workers is merged as well. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 17:45, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
@ LaundryPizza03: I was about to nominate it above, I guess this is a case of jumping the gun slightly :P ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 17:46, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Merge both per nom. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 17:47, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Works by setting

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 27#Category:Works by setting

Category:Turkish arms traffickers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 13:53, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Only two articles, with no other nationality subcategories in the parent. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 17:25, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional characters by beliefs or ideologies

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 27#Category:Fictional characters by beliefs or ideologies

Category:21st-century African-American sportspeople

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 27#Category:21st-century African-American sportspeople

Category:Fictional yogis

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 13:57, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Contains only Dhalsim. It can possibly be merged somewhere, but I am not sure where. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 17:13, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional deserters

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 13:58, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Only has one member. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 17:09, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Oppose AHI-3000 ( talk) 17:56, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Nations at the Maccabiah

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 27#Category:Nations at the Maccabiah

Category:Jewish organizations based in New Jersey

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: triple merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 14:01, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Such organizations are not (as far as I can tell) divided by state AND is very small. There were two pages which were, in fact, based in New York City which I've moved accordingly. Omnis Scientia ( talk) 16:26, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional natural scientists

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge all. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 14:02, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: WP:NARROWCAT that only contains two smaller categories. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 16:10, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Merge we don't need to divide Category:Fictional scientists any further than by occupation. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 17:04, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Oppose. By the way, Category:Fictional characters by occupation looks like a gigantic chaotic mess right now. AHI-3000 ( talk) 17:55, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
I have subcategorized dozens of categories already, so it was an even more chaotic mess before. Though it should be said that a lot of the categories were originally in the right place before they were removed to go into the now-deleted categories and now have to be recategorized. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 18:07, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
And I still feel like we need Category:Fictional people in law enforcement as a layer. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 18:53, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Deleting Category:Fictional characters by occupational types was one thing, but I think we should've kept most of the subcategories within it, especially the subcategories for illegal occupations, judicial/penal system, law enforcement, military, etc. And regarding these scientist subcategories, I think we also at least should've kept "Fictional scientists by field" to contain them. AHI-3000 ( talk) 20:52, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Jewish Community Center

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Jewish Community Centers. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 14:05, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Merge category; basically serves the same purpose. WP:OVERLAP probably applies here. Omnis Scientia ( talk) 15:42, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional characters who break the fourth wall

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 27#Category:Fictional characters who break the fourth wall

Category:Fictional nuclear engineers

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 27#Category:Fictional nuclear engineers

Category:Time travel in Star Trek

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 27#Category:Time travel in Star Trek

X in fiction IV

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 14:09, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Conversion from X in fiction to Fiction about X, as this must be a defining trait. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 09:16, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Time travel and multiple reality role-playing games

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: manual merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 14:09, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Mixture of time travel and multiverse concepts. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 09:13, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Multiple time paths in fiction

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 14:13, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Undefined mixture of multiverse and time travel concepts; for example, Final Destination and The Minority Report are about precognition, while Category:Time loop is self-explanatory. The entries and subcategories are, or should be, in other branches of Category:Time in fiction or Category:Parallel universes in fiction, but the merge targets are not necessarily the same in all cases. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 08:42, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Per nom while adding to any other category that may be relevant. This, however, is overly vague to be a category. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 13:28, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Neurotrauma

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 27#Category:Neurotrauma

Category:History of Chitral

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 27#Category:History of Chitral

Category:Ancient Greeks by death

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 27#Category:Ancient Greeks by death

Category:Fiction about mermaids

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 16:52, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: I recently closed this discussion to move Category:Fictional mermen and mermaids to Category:Fictional merfolk, and to split other entries into a new category, Category:Fiction about merfolk. However, Category:Fiction about mermaids already exists as the parent to "Fictional merfolk". I'd like to suggest that "Fiction about mermaids" be renamed and the split redirected to the newly renamed category instead. bibliomaniac 1 5 05:51, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Support per nom. Mason ( talk) 06:01, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Support for the sake of consistency with the Fictional merfolk category. AHI-3000 ( talk) 18:33, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Support per precedent. Marcocapelle ( talk) 06:57, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Oppose Category is primarily for mermaids, not other merpeople. InfiniteNexus ( talk) 19:43, 21 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Support There is a gender-neutral term available. After this, we can probably use WP:CFDS for the rest. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 19:11, 22 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Suburban Minneapolis School Districts

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 27#Category:Suburban Minneapolis School Districts

Category:Masonic buildings in Norway

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 16:52, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SMALLCAT (1 article). It's already in the Norway subcategory. User:Namiba 01:58, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Support per nom. Mason ( talk) 06:00, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Merge for now, without objection to recreate the category when it can be better populated. Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:10, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional characters with neurological or psychological disorders

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: combine to Category:Fictional characters with mental disorders (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 18:01, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Propose merging or renaming these related categories into each other:
Nominator's rationale: So we have this set of four categories connected together, which are all about mental/neurological/psychiatric/psychological disorders. I don't have a formal plan yet, but I think we can all agree that at least one or more of these categories are redundant or superfluous. They certainly need to be merged and simplified somehow. AHI-3000 ( talk) 02:04, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Update: per LaundryPizza03's suggestion, my current proposal is to keep Category:Fictional characters with mental disorders, and merge the other three categories into it. Any subcategories that are not about mental disorders should be removed. AHI-3000 ( talk) 06:55, 21 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Support in principle: I think that we should model the names after the people with disabilities categories. Mason ( talk) 06:01, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Going by Smasongarrison's suggestion, we should merge all to Category:Fictional characters with mental disorders, which is the fictional counterpart of Category:People with mental disorders, and then purge subcategories that are not for mental disorders. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 08:22, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
I like Laundry's suggestion. If the real-life counterpart is about people with mental disorders, then the combined fictional character category should follow a similar naming pattern. AHI-3000 ( talk) 18:40, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional characters with density control abilities

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 27#Category:Fictional characters with density control abilities

Category:Uzbeksitan navigational boxes

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy delete. CSD C1, G7 Liz Read! Talk! 03:58, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Misspelled, duplicate to Category:Uzbekistan navigational boxes. Recategorize contents to the correctly spelled category and delete. DB1729 talk 00:18, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Sorry, my bad. I've recategorized the contents of the cat with the typo. It should now be deleted. Nataev talk 02:53, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2023_December_19&oldid=1192721760"

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook




Top Of Page

Home • Search • Translate

© CSE