The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep, even while there is no separate article (yet) it is still a defining characteristic.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 20:17, 20 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep Best to build the structure connected to it before we build an article as the company ramps up. No issue with this category. Nate•(
chatter) 23:44, 20 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment Despite the socking, my vote! remains the same. Nate•(
chatter) 02:59, 26 August 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Defunct code search engines
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Agree in principle but merge to parent categories instead of a plain deletion.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 20:19, 20 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Indeed, upmerging was my intended resolution; it's more of a
WP:NARROWCAT than completely inappropriate.
Retro (
talk |
contribs) 11:26, 21 August 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: merge, this is a very poorly populated tree (many raions are not even represented in this tree), it is better to organize this at oblast level than at raion level.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 10:49, 20 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions.
GiantSnowman 18:31, 22 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Support per nom, this feels like over categorisation.
GiantSnowman 18:33, 22 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Support Good analysis.
Orientls (
talk) 17:06, 23 August 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fiction about monsters
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗plicit 01:03, 12 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Oppose The current title has a clearer definition.
Dimadick (
talk) 06:04, 13 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 09:04, 20 August 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:People from Löbau (Lubawa)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:merge, we do not need a separate category by every former name of a populated place (with some exceptions like Byzantium/Constantinople/Istanbul).
Marcocapelle (
talk) 16:38, 12 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 09:02, 20 August 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:People from Prussia
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 09:01, 20 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Support - seems reasonable.
Oculi (
talk) 10:48, 20 August 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose I believe cause of death categories to be more defining than categories by ethnicity or religious affiliation.
Dimadick (
talk) 06:00, 13 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Oppose Just because certain causes of death are extremely common doesn’t mean they’re aren’t notable. They just simply need to be segregated by location, e.g. by country, region, etc.
Giovanni 0331 (
talk) 19:33, 13 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Notability is only relevant to articles, not to categories. For categories
WP:OC is applicale, in this case
WP:TRIVIALCAT in particular.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 17:36, 16 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 09:01, 20 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete all per nom: An extremely common cause of death and non-notable as a result. If we had this, we would end up having a huge amount of similar categories to a point of drain on the project's servers. It also is not really a category that is going to ever be complete, as a result of how common it is.—
Shibbolethink(
♔♕) 14:08, 20 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete all per nom. Cause of death rarely defines a life.
Rathfelder (
talk) 21:07, 22 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete all per nom and Rathfelder. The nuances of a particular individual's death are probably better described in prose. And when the cause of death is a defining characteristic, the death event will usually have its own article. Looking at the articles that populate the categories in this nomination, they appear to be almost entirely biographies of individuals.
Retro (
talk |
contribs) 14:05, 26 August 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep, even while there is no separate article (yet) it is still a defining characteristic.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 20:17, 20 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep Best to build the structure connected to it before we build an article as the company ramps up. No issue with this category. Nate•(
chatter) 23:44, 20 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment Despite the socking, my vote! remains the same. Nate•(
chatter) 02:59, 26 August 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Defunct code search engines
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Agree in principle but merge to parent categories instead of a plain deletion.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 20:19, 20 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Indeed, upmerging was my intended resolution; it's more of a
WP:NARROWCAT than completely inappropriate.
Retro (
talk |
contribs) 11:26, 21 August 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: merge, this is a very poorly populated tree (many raions are not even represented in this tree), it is better to organize this at oblast level than at raion level.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 10:49, 20 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions.
GiantSnowman 18:31, 22 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Support per nom, this feels like over categorisation.
GiantSnowman 18:33, 22 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Support Good analysis.
Orientls (
talk) 17:06, 23 August 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fiction about monsters
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗plicit 01:03, 12 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Oppose The current title has a clearer definition.
Dimadick (
talk) 06:04, 13 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 09:04, 20 August 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:People from Löbau (Lubawa)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:merge, we do not need a separate category by every former name of a populated place (with some exceptions like Byzantium/Constantinople/Istanbul).
Marcocapelle (
talk) 16:38, 12 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 09:02, 20 August 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:People from Prussia
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 09:01, 20 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Support - seems reasonable.
Oculi (
talk) 10:48, 20 August 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose I believe cause of death categories to be more defining than categories by ethnicity or religious affiliation.
Dimadick (
talk) 06:00, 13 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Oppose Just because certain causes of death are extremely common doesn’t mean they’re aren’t notable. They just simply need to be segregated by location, e.g. by country, region, etc.
Giovanni 0331 (
talk) 19:33, 13 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Notability is only relevant to articles, not to categories. For categories
WP:OC is applicale, in this case
WP:TRIVIALCAT in particular.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 17:36, 16 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 09:01, 20 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete all per nom: An extremely common cause of death and non-notable as a result. If we had this, we would end up having a huge amount of similar categories to a point of drain on the project's servers. It also is not really a category that is going to ever be complete, as a result of how common it is.—
Shibbolethink(
♔♕) 14:08, 20 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete all per nom. Cause of death rarely defines a life.
Rathfelder (
talk) 21:07, 22 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete all per nom and Rathfelder. The nuances of a particular individual's death are probably better described in prose. And when the cause of death is a defining characteristic, the death event will usually have its own article. Looking at the articles that populate the categories in this nomination, they appear to be almost entirely biographies of individuals.
Retro (
talk |
contribs) 14:05, 26 August 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.