The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Don't need two categories for the same language.
* Pppery *it has begun... 21:10, 13 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Support as both are the same.--
Mvqr (
talk) 10:48, 20 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:User nbl
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:User iii
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Don't need two categories for the same language.
* Pppery *it has begun... 21:10, 13 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:User sag
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Recreation of category previously deleted per
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2017 October 30#Category:Multilingual Wikipedians under a technically accurate but nonsensical name containing only one user who has been inactive since 2007. Actually emptying the category without changing the displayed appearance of the sole member's userpage will be a pain since the category is populated by the babel extension, but I am willing to handle implementing it myself when the time for that comes.
* Pppery *it has begun... 21:10, 13 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep unless empty. I created these categories to fill redlinks listed at
Special:WantedCategories. I have no substantive views on the merits of the categories; my only concern is that per
WP:REDNOT, populated categories should have a category page. --
BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (
contribs) 21:32, 13 April 2022 (UTC)reply
I understand that, and as I said above would be willing to empty the category if this discussion is closed as delete.
* Pppery *it has begun... 21:44, 13 April 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Pppery, my concern is not emptying the cat after deletion. The problem for me is keeping it empty, so that we dont end up in yet another of the cycles of deletion and re-creation which plagues all these wretched babel-populated categs.
It seems to me that this needs to start with the fixes to the babel system
BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (
contribs) 21:33, 14 April 2022 (UTC)reply
I don't see how that danger can occur if the sole member has not edited since 2007. The original population of this category was done during
Special:WantedTemplates cleanup and
Special:WantedTemplates is now cleared so that circumstance can't recur.
* Pppery *it has begun... 21:38, 14 April 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Pppery: if you can amend the babel stuff so that {{#Babel:en|mul}} no longer populates a category, then I will withdraw my objection. Can you do that?
BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (
contribs) 10:10, 20 April 2022 (UTC)reply
My original goal was to edit the user page to not contain that markup. But that seems unlikely to get consensus here, so I've instead filed
phab:T306539 to fix the babel system and closing this CfD.
* Pppery *it has begun... 15:14, 20 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep unless empty. I created 2 of these categories to fill redlinks listed at
Special:WantedCategories. I have no substantive views on the merits of the categories; my only concern is that per
WP:REDNOT, populated categories should have a category page. --
BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (
contribs) 21:35, 13 April 2022 (UTC)reply
I of course understand that, and thus did the work of emptying the categories in the template sandbox (it's inappropriate to empty categories before bringing them to CfD - that renders the discussion meaningless).
* Pppery *it has begun... 21:44, 13 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep unless empty. Exactly the same stance and rationale as BrownHairedGirl. I created the latn-5 one for the same reasons, as well. /ˈswɛ̹͡yn/78 05:06, 14 April 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Marcocapelle: I think I am satisfied. If closing as delete, pls make sure to alert @
Pppery to implement the template fixes, and thereby empty the category.
BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (
contribs) 10:05, 20 April 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Marcocapelle: Aye, I suppose so. I'm fine either way. If the categories are going to be deleted, they need to first be emptied of all contents, which
User:Pppery has offered to do. /ˈswɛ̹͡yn/78 04:29, 21 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Songs about walking
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete. ♠
PMC♠
(talk) 22:48, 2 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale:WP:IINFO. Just songs with "walk" in the title, regardless of whether or not any actual walking happens. This is not a defining trait of any of the songs. Ten Pound Hammer • (
What did I screw up now?) 04:43, 13 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete, I checked a dozen articles and neither of the songs in these articles was clearly about walking.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 04:52, 13 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete This is a category of how many different meanings to 'walk' there are, so hardly defining.--
Richhoncho (
talk) 07:26, 13 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete It made me laugh, so that's not nothing. But clearly not an encyclopedic category.
Nohomersryan (
talk) 18:09, 13 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete, a small minority of them might be about walking, or dog walking, but it's really just a shared name.--
Mvqr (
talk) 10:53, 20 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Don't need two categories for the same language.
* Pppery *it has begun... 21:10, 13 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Support as both are the same.--
Mvqr (
talk) 10:48, 20 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:User nbl
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:User iii
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Don't need two categories for the same language.
* Pppery *it has begun... 21:10, 13 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:User sag
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Recreation of category previously deleted per
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2017 October 30#Category:Multilingual Wikipedians under a technically accurate but nonsensical name containing only one user who has been inactive since 2007. Actually emptying the category without changing the displayed appearance of the sole member's userpage will be a pain since the category is populated by the babel extension, but I am willing to handle implementing it myself when the time for that comes.
* Pppery *it has begun... 21:10, 13 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep unless empty. I created these categories to fill redlinks listed at
Special:WantedCategories. I have no substantive views on the merits of the categories; my only concern is that per
WP:REDNOT, populated categories should have a category page. --
BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (
contribs) 21:32, 13 April 2022 (UTC)reply
I understand that, and as I said above would be willing to empty the category if this discussion is closed as delete.
* Pppery *it has begun... 21:44, 13 April 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Pppery, my concern is not emptying the cat after deletion. The problem for me is keeping it empty, so that we dont end up in yet another of the cycles of deletion and re-creation which plagues all these wretched babel-populated categs.
It seems to me that this needs to start with the fixes to the babel system
BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (
contribs) 21:33, 14 April 2022 (UTC)reply
I don't see how that danger can occur if the sole member has not edited since 2007. The original population of this category was done during
Special:WantedTemplates cleanup and
Special:WantedTemplates is now cleared so that circumstance can't recur.
* Pppery *it has begun... 21:38, 14 April 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Pppery: if you can amend the babel stuff so that {{#Babel:en|mul}} no longer populates a category, then I will withdraw my objection. Can you do that?
BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (
contribs) 10:10, 20 April 2022 (UTC)reply
My original goal was to edit the user page to not contain that markup. But that seems unlikely to get consensus here, so I've instead filed
phab:T306539 to fix the babel system and closing this CfD.
* Pppery *it has begun... 15:14, 20 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep unless empty. I created 2 of these categories to fill redlinks listed at
Special:WantedCategories. I have no substantive views on the merits of the categories; my only concern is that per
WP:REDNOT, populated categories should have a category page. --
BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (
contribs) 21:35, 13 April 2022 (UTC)reply
I of course understand that, and thus did the work of emptying the categories in the template sandbox (it's inappropriate to empty categories before bringing them to CfD - that renders the discussion meaningless).
* Pppery *it has begun... 21:44, 13 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep unless empty. Exactly the same stance and rationale as BrownHairedGirl. I created the latn-5 one for the same reasons, as well. /ˈswɛ̹͡yn/78 05:06, 14 April 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Marcocapelle: I think I am satisfied. If closing as delete, pls make sure to alert @
Pppery to implement the template fixes, and thereby empty the category.
BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (
contribs) 10:05, 20 April 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Marcocapelle: Aye, I suppose so. I'm fine either way. If the categories are going to be deleted, they need to first be emptied of all contents, which
User:Pppery has offered to do. /ˈswɛ̹͡yn/78 04:29, 21 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Songs about walking
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete. ♠
PMC♠
(talk) 22:48, 2 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale:WP:IINFO. Just songs with "walk" in the title, regardless of whether or not any actual walking happens. This is not a defining trait of any of the songs. Ten Pound Hammer • (
What did I screw up now?) 04:43, 13 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete, I checked a dozen articles and neither of the songs in these articles was clearly about walking.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 04:52, 13 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete This is a category of how many different meanings to 'walk' there are, so hardly defining.--
Richhoncho (
talk) 07:26, 13 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete It made me laugh, so that's not nothing. But clearly not an encyclopedic category.
Nohomersryan (
talk) 18:09, 13 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete, a small minority of them might be about walking, or dog walking, but it's really just a shared name.--
Mvqr (
talk) 10:53, 20 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.