From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 21

Category:Shamili's films

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete...and already empty. The Bushranger One ping only 02:09, 28 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Delete. Overcategorization of performer by performance. We don't categorize films by what actors appeared in them. Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:58, 21 June 2012 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Per the multiple similar categories already deleted for the same reason. Lugnuts ( talk) 10:19, 22 June 2012 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Kyrgyz literature

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. The Bushranger One ping only 02:09, 28 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Rename. This category is for Kyrgyz-language literature. The category for literature of Kyrgyzstan is at Category:Kyrgyzstani literature. We need to add the "language" because sometimes "Kyrgyz" is used as a synonym for "Kyrgyzstani". Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:23, 21 June 2012 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Dance pogging

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: SPEEDY DELETE, empty "category." postdlf ( talk) 02:42, 22 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: This is a draft article, not a category. The draft cites no reliable sources and states that "pogging" was invented yesterday, so this isn't a viable article either, per WP:NOTNEO. John of Reading ( talk) 21:24, 21 June 2012 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Wikipedians interested in regiving

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. The Bushranger One ping only 02:10, 28 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Rename. The main topic seems to be freecycling rather than regiving; the latter is narrower and somewhat deprecated. (See also Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2012 June 16#Category:Regiving re the head category.) – Fayenatic L ondon 07:28, 21 June 2012 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Modern aerobatic teams

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge. Timrollpickering ( talk) 19:42, 28 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: This is a classic example of a "current" category of the sort that is discouraged. The header notes: "currently flying aerobatic teams". Yet some of these teams come and go; some in the category are no doubt defunct. This category should be merged into its parent (then redifussed as necessary), as the "modern" (misnamed as well as inappropriate) lable is not useful to Wikipedia's readers, nor is it defining. The Bushranger One ping only 06:06, 21 June 2012 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 21

Category:Shamili's films

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete...and already empty. The Bushranger One ping only 02:09, 28 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Delete. Overcategorization of performer by performance. We don't categorize films by what actors appeared in them. Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:58, 21 June 2012 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Per the multiple similar categories already deleted for the same reason. Lugnuts ( talk) 10:19, 22 June 2012 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Kyrgyz literature

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. The Bushranger One ping only 02:09, 28 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Rename. This category is for Kyrgyz-language literature. The category for literature of Kyrgyzstan is at Category:Kyrgyzstani literature. We need to add the "language" because sometimes "Kyrgyz" is used as a synonym for "Kyrgyzstani". Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:23, 21 June 2012 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Dance pogging

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: SPEEDY DELETE, empty "category." postdlf ( talk) 02:42, 22 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: This is a draft article, not a category. The draft cites no reliable sources and states that "pogging" was invented yesterday, so this isn't a viable article either, per WP:NOTNEO. John of Reading ( talk) 21:24, 21 June 2012 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Wikipedians interested in regiving

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. The Bushranger One ping only 02:10, 28 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Rename. The main topic seems to be freecycling rather than regiving; the latter is narrower and somewhat deprecated. (See also Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2012 June 16#Category:Regiving re the head category.) – Fayenatic L ondon 07:28, 21 June 2012 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Modern aerobatic teams

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge. Timrollpickering ( talk) 19:42, 28 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: This is a classic example of a "current" category of the sort that is discouraged. The header notes: "currently flying aerobatic teams". Yet some of these teams come and go; some in the category are no doubt defunct. This category should be merged into its parent (then redifussed as necessary), as the "modern" (misnamed as well as inappropriate) lable is not useful to Wikipedia's readers, nor is it defining. The Bushranger One ping only 06:06, 21 June 2012 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook