The result of the debate was rename -- Drini 15:20, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 15:52, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 15:45, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Danish directors to Category:Danish film directors
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:44, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Calgary Hitmen players ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 15:41, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Merge into Category:Hindu temples in India (for subsequent recategorisation by state). These are informal regions and it makes more sense to divide these up by state of territory, which process has already been started. This matches what is being done for other topic areas, including Category:Buildings and structures in India by state or territory. Indian states and territories have an average population of 30 million and there are umpteen thousand Hindu temples in the country, many of them ancient and spiritually important, so I don't think state level subdivision is excessive. Brammen 19:55, 23 September 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:40, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Scottish immigrants to England ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The result of the debate was already deleted -- Kbdank71 15:19, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:00s births ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The result of the debate was already deleted -- Kbdank71 15:17, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Non-Scottish St Johnstone F.C. managers ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 15:37, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was already deleted -- Kbdank71 15:08, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was already deleted -- Kbdank71 14:57, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was already renamed/merged as nominated -- Kbdank71 14:57, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Universal films to Category:Universal Pictures films
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 14:55, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Historic County of Cheshire ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Category:Ceremonial County of Cheshire
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 15:34, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Oz actors to Category:Oz (fictional region) actors
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 15:28, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 15:27, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 15:26, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 15:24, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was already deleted -- Kbdank71 14:53, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 14:53, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 14:52, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Specialised user block templates ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The result of the debate was delete 132.248.196.191 04:01, 1 October 2006 (UTC) Category:Anal porn actress ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 14:31, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 14:16, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Scottish market towns to Category:Market towns in Scotland
The result of the debate was Withdrawn (would have been no consensus). Runcorn 17:03, 30 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Withdrawn
Rename:
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 13:53, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Rename:
This is related to the other fictional chararacter powers nominations below. The idea is to standardise the use of "power" rather than "ability" in order to remove confusion. For example, category:Fictional aviators is included under category:Fictional characters who can fly. While that is true, this opens the category up to anyone who was on a plane, or used a Legion flight ring, or any other device that allows flight. Since the category is about characters (a subcategory of category:Fictional characters), the abilities should be character abilities, rather than abilities stemming from devices. (Which may or may not be worthy of their own categories, but that's beyond the scope of this nomination.) Using "superhuman" in order to differentiate between Fictional abilities (such as Fictional linguists - of which "polyglot" is a notable ability), and actual superhuman powers (compare to: Superhuman strength).- jc37 00:00, 23 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Splitting them into sub-sections for ease of discussion. Please comment by sub-section, not "at the bottom", since that turned out to be confusing in a previous CfD. (Also, due to the complexity of some of these nominations, please do not depopulate/populate the categories until after this CfD has been closed.)
The result of the debate was no change -- Kbdank71 13:57, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 13:55, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Rename:
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 14:00, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Rename:
...with the power to...:
...with the power to manipulate...:
likely additions:
For disambiguation. These are all sub-categories of
category:Fictional characters by special ability (See that nomination above), which is a sub-category of
category:Fictional characters. Important words: Fictional, character, power, manipulate. This also removes the various neologisms (including the -kineticist ones), and broadens the categories to other origins of the character utilizing the specific power (magic or whatever). -
jc37 00:00, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 14:00, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Rename
The result of the debate was option A as nominated (someone else will need to take care of it, I don't know what subcats to put them in; let me know when it's done and I'll delete the cat) -- Kbdank71 14:11, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
A.) Merge:
OR
B.) Rename:
The trouble is that there were/are many definitions of what consists of an element, and it's an additional categorisation level that might lessen "ease of use". (Note that the "ice characters" sub-category is listed in both.) This is further complicated due to elemental, which is different than being able to manipulate the elements. (To reiterate from above: due to the complexity of this nom, please do not depopulate/populate the category during this CfD.) - jc37 00:00, 23 September 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename -- Drini 15:20, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 15:52, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 15:45, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Danish directors to Category:Danish film directors
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:44, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Calgary Hitmen players ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 15:41, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Merge into Category:Hindu temples in India (for subsequent recategorisation by state). These are informal regions and it makes more sense to divide these up by state of territory, which process has already been started. This matches what is being done for other topic areas, including Category:Buildings and structures in India by state or territory. Indian states and territories have an average population of 30 million and there are umpteen thousand Hindu temples in the country, many of them ancient and spiritually important, so I don't think state level subdivision is excessive. Brammen 19:55, 23 September 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:40, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Scottish immigrants to England ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The result of the debate was already deleted -- Kbdank71 15:19, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:00s births ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The result of the debate was already deleted -- Kbdank71 15:17, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Non-Scottish St Johnstone F.C. managers ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 15:37, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was already deleted -- Kbdank71 15:08, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was already deleted -- Kbdank71 14:57, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was already renamed/merged as nominated -- Kbdank71 14:57, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Universal films to Category:Universal Pictures films
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 14:55, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Historic County of Cheshire ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Category:Ceremonial County of Cheshire
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 15:34, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Oz actors to Category:Oz (fictional region) actors
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 15:28, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 15:27, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 15:26, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 15:24, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was already deleted -- Kbdank71 14:53, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 14:53, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 14:52, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Specialised user block templates ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The result of the debate was delete 132.248.196.191 04:01, 1 October 2006 (UTC) Category:Anal porn actress ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 14:31, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 14:16, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Scottish market towns to Category:Market towns in Scotland
The result of the debate was Withdrawn (would have been no consensus). Runcorn 17:03, 30 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Withdrawn
Rename:
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 13:53, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Rename:
This is related to the other fictional chararacter powers nominations below. The idea is to standardise the use of "power" rather than "ability" in order to remove confusion. For example, category:Fictional aviators is included under category:Fictional characters who can fly. While that is true, this opens the category up to anyone who was on a plane, or used a Legion flight ring, or any other device that allows flight. Since the category is about characters (a subcategory of category:Fictional characters), the abilities should be character abilities, rather than abilities stemming from devices. (Which may or may not be worthy of their own categories, but that's beyond the scope of this nomination.) Using "superhuman" in order to differentiate between Fictional abilities (such as Fictional linguists - of which "polyglot" is a notable ability), and actual superhuman powers (compare to: Superhuman strength).- jc37 00:00, 23 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Splitting them into sub-sections for ease of discussion. Please comment by sub-section, not "at the bottom", since that turned out to be confusing in a previous CfD. (Also, due to the complexity of some of these nominations, please do not depopulate/populate the categories until after this CfD has been closed.)
The result of the debate was no change -- Kbdank71 13:57, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 13:55, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Rename:
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 14:00, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Rename:
...with the power to...:
...with the power to manipulate...:
likely additions:
For disambiguation. These are all sub-categories of
category:Fictional characters by special ability (See that nomination above), which is a sub-category of
category:Fictional characters. Important words: Fictional, character, power, manipulate. This also removes the various neologisms (including the -kineticist ones), and broadens the categories to other origins of the character utilizing the specific power (magic or whatever). -
jc37 00:00, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 14:00, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Rename
The result of the debate was option A as nominated (someone else will need to take care of it, I don't know what subcats to put them in; let me know when it's done and I'll delete the cat) -- Kbdank71 14:11, 2 October 2006 (UTC) reply
A.) Merge:
OR
B.) Rename:
The trouble is that there were/are many definitions of what consists of an element, and it's an additional categorisation level that might lessen "ease of use". (Note that the "ice characters" sub-category is listed in both.) This is further complicated due to elemental, which is different than being able to manipulate the elements. (To reiterate from above: due to the complexity of this nom, please do not depopulate/populate the category during this CfD.) - jc37 00:00, 23 September 2006 (UTC) reply