The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at
WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Speedily Approved.
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):
Edit period(s): Twice a month
Estimated number of pages affected: A few hundreds (a dry run on
Wikipedia:CHECKWIKI/WPC 550 dump results in 162 modified pages out of the 671 pages found in the dump analysis)
Function details: The bot will remove links the form [[XXX|<nowiki/>]] because such links are useless and are probably a bug due to the Visual Editor (VE) or the Translation tool (CX). It will help fixing some issues not fixed with the
split links.
I already run a similar task on frwiki with
76 edits.
Discussion
Speedily Approved. Saw quite a few of these when looking over the previous task, so I know it works out.
Primefac (
talk) 21:53, 19 April 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at
WT:BRFA.
The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at
WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Speedily Approved.
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):
Edit period(s): Twice a month
Estimated number of pages affected: A few hundreds (a dry run on
Wikipedia:CHECKWIKI/WPC 550 dump results in 162 modified pages out of the 671 pages found in the dump analysis)
Function details: The bot will remove links the form [[XXX|<nowiki/>]] because such links are useless and are probably a bug due to the Visual Editor (VE) or the Translation tool (CX). It will help fixing some issues not fixed with the
split links.
I already run a similar task on frwiki with
76 edits.
Discussion
Speedily Approved. Saw quite a few of these when looking over the previous task, so I know it works out.
Primefac (
talk) 21:53, 19 April 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at
WT:BRFA.