- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:33, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
The International Resource Privilege
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- The International Resource Privilege ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Incoherent start/stub article with a references list that despite its surface impressiveness doesn’t seem to demonstrate notability. While I personally agree completely with the sentiments expressed, it’s quite unclear that it passes encyclopedic muster, in my opinion. RadioactiveBoulevardier ( talk) 09:54, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. RadioactiveBoulevardier ( talk) 09:54, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:09, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:32, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:55, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete WP:NOTESSAY + WP:OR. Regards, -- Goldsztajn ( talk) 23:08, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:33, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
The International Resource Privilege
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- The International Resource Privilege ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Incoherent start/stub article with a references list that despite its surface impressiveness doesn’t seem to demonstrate notability. While I personally agree completely with the sentiments expressed, it’s quite unclear that it passes encyclopedic muster, in my opinion. RadioactiveBoulevardier ( talk) 09:54, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. RadioactiveBoulevardier ( talk) 09:54, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:09, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:32, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:55, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete WP:NOTESSAY + WP:OR. Regards, -- Goldsztajn ( talk) 23:08, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.