- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 08:39, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Studiometry
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Studiometry ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NSOFT, not notable, no reliable independent sources, just one random old product review. Deltaspace42 ( talk • contribs) 13:29, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software. Deltaspace42 ( talk • contribs) 13:29, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:55, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:55, 27 December 2023 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:40, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Meets WP:PRODUCT. "Just one random old product review" is factually inaccurate as the article already cites three reviews, at least two of which are in reliable sources. It looks like most versions back to at least 1.1 received reviews in 2000-era Macintosh magazines; see this archive.org search. Jfire ( talk) 05:48, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Source 1 is pretty weak, but sources 2 and 3 in the article along with the source Jfire found establishes WP:NPRODUCT. As a remark, I'm surprised that archive.org even has the executables available for download online (although I had to remove the "&sin=TXT" from Jfire's search link for it to work for me). Darcyisverycute ( talk) 18:30, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 08:39, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Studiometry
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Studiometry ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NSOFT, not notable, no reliable independent sources, just one random old product review. Deltaspace42 ( talk • contribs) 13:29, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software. Deltaspace42 ( talk • contribs) 13:29, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:55, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:55, 27 December 2023 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:40, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Meets WP:PRODUCT. "Just one random old product review" is factually inaccurate as the article already cites three reviews, at least two of which are in reliable sources. It looks like most versions back to at least 1.1 received reviews in 2000-era Macintosh magazines; see this archive.org search. Jfire ( talk) 05:48, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Source 1 is pretty weak, but sources 2 and 3 in the article along with the source Jfire found establishes WP:NPRODUCT. As a remark, I'm surprised that archive.org even has the executables available for download online (although I had to remove the "&sin=TXT" from Jfire's search link for it to work for me). Darcyisverycute ( talk) 18:30, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.