- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 19:18, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Steve Dabilz
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Steve Dabilz ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article lacks reliable sources, with a majority of its citations coming from Steve Dabilz's personal website. ZLEA T\ C 19:11, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ZLEA T\ C 19:11, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. ZLEA T\ C 19:11, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. ZLEA T\ C 19:11, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete No evidence of notability. Mccapra ( talk) 19:48, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Keep This person is famous and notable enough.
Arnobrac ( talk) 16:48, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
KeepThis person's name has been mentioned in different newspaper articles and this person looks notable.
Zahir1959( talk) 17:12,19 June 2020 (UTC)
-
Note: Struck comments from suspected sockpuppets. See
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ishita1119.
Mz7 (
talk) 23:10, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
-
- Delete Fails GNG. One reference is a primary source and the others have only passing mentions on the subject. – 2. O. Boxing 19:43, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: Does appear to fail GNG, no other useful sourcing found in my Google searches. Waggie ( talk) 19:53, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete for failing WP:GNG. It is unclear whether his last name is "Dabliz" or "Dabilz", both are used in the article. The title uses "Dabilz", but the award was given to "Dabliz". I have corrected some obvious grammatical, semantic and spelling errors. But as to notability, I found no claim other than the AMUST award, which by itself does not provide GNG notability. The "Virgin Mary" tempest-in-a-teapot does not either. There is a lack of adequate significant coverage. -- Bejnar ( talk) 01:58, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 19:18, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Steve Dabilz
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Steve Dabilz ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article lacks reliable sources, with a majority of its citations coming from Steve Dabilz's personal website. ZLEA T\ C 19:11, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ZLEA T\ C 19:11, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. ZLEA T\ C 19:11, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. ZLEA T\ C 19:11, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete No evidence of notability. Mccapra ( talk) 19:48, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Keep This person is famous and notable enough.
Arnobrac ( talk) 16:48, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
KeepThis person's name has been mentioned in different newspaper articles and this person looks notable.
Zahir1959( talk) 17:12,19 June 2020 (UTC)
-
Note: Struck comments from suspected sockpuppets. See
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ishita1119.
Mz7 (
talk) 23:10, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
-
- Delete Fails GNG. One reference is a primary source and the others have only passing mentions on the subject. – 2. O. Boxing 19:43, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: Does appear to fail GNG, no other useful sourcing found in my Google searches. Waggie ( talk) 19:53, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete for failing WP:GNG. It is unclear whether his last name is "Dabliz" or "Dabilz", both are used in the article. The title uses "Dabilz", but the award was given to "Dabliz". I have corrected some obvious grammatical, semantic and spelling errors. But as to notability, I found no claim other than the AMUST award, which by itself does not provide GNG notability. The "Virgin Mary" tempest-in-a-teapot does not either. There is a lack of adequate significant coverage. -- Bejnar ( talk) 01:58, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.