The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
✗plicit 23:52, 2 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete — I’m afraid I don’t see how NPOL is met, I am in agreement with the nominator. Celestina007 (
talk) 22:59, 26 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete. Completely fails
WP:NPOL. Except for his own self-published campaign 'manifesto' for an election at the lowest tier of local government, the provided sources contain only fleeting mentions or a name on a list, and are in no way about the subject. Incidentally, created by a user later blocked as a sock, this article also has the hallmarks of UPE or at least a very strong COI..
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (
talk) 00:08, 27 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. All the sources mentioning him are the very briefest of passing mentions, stating just his name and the constituency he represents. Doesn't pass NPOL or GNG.
AryKun (
talk) 10:40, 27 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete. County government is not a level of office that confers an automatic free pass of
WP:NPOL, but the substance and sourcing here are nowhere near where they would need to be to make him a special case.
Bearcat (
talk) 18:06, 31 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete, is far from our notability standards.--ChukaChieftalk 17:08, 1 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
✗plicit 23:52, 2 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete — I’m afraid I don’t see how NPOL is met, I am in agreement with the nominator. Celestina007 (
talk) 22:59, 26 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete. Completely fails
WP:NPOL. Except for his own self-published campaign 'manifesto' for an election at the lowest tier of local government, the provided sources contain only fleeting mentions or a name on a list, and are in no way about the subject. Incidentally, created by a user later blocked as a sock, this article also has the hallmarks of UPE or at least a very strong COI..
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (
talk) 00:08, 27 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. All the sources mentioning him are the very briefest of passing mentions, stating just his name and the constituency he represents. Doesn't pass NPOL or GNG.
AryKun (
talk) 10:40, 27 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete. County government is not a level of office that confers an automatic free pass of
WP:NPOL, but the substance and sourcing here are nowhere near where they would need to be to make him a special case.
Bearcat (
talk) 18:06, 31 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete, is far from our notability standards.--ChukaChieftalk 17:08, 1 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.