- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. NORTH AMERICA 1000 19:00, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Schirmer Abduction
- Schirmer Abduction ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails our WP:FRINGE inclusion guidelines. Unsourced and not-notable. jps ( talk) 06:51, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: Totally unsourced original research culled, presumably, from various fringe blogs and websites. No mention in reliable sources, never mind substantial coverage in multiple reliable independent secondary sources, our requirement for inclusion. Flush twice, and close the lid, please. Dominus Vobisdu ( talk) 07:03, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nebraska-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 08:32, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
- Do not keep. Unreferenced, and this cannot be considered to be a reliable source. -- 115ash →(☏) 16:16, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:24, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:24, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- Merge with main article on the report, which will have reliable sources regarding that part of their findings. Panyd The muffin is not subtle 11:14, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - does not meet our inclusion criteria and clearly fails content policies. St★lwart 111 01:49, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. NORTH AMERICA 1000 19:00, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Schirmer Abduction
- Schirmer Abduction ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails our WP:FRINGE inclusion guidelines. Unsourced and not-notable. jps ( talk) 06:51, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: Totally unsourced original research culled, presumably, from various fringe blogs and websites. No mention in reliable sources, never mind substantial coverage in multiple reliable independent secondary sources, our requirement for inclusion. Flush twice, and close the lid, please. Dominus Vobisdu ( talk) 07:03, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nebraska-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 08:32, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
- Do not keep. Unreferenced, and this cannot be considered to be a reliable source. -- 115ash →(☏) 16:16, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:24, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:24, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- Merge with main article on the report, which will have reliable sources regarding that part of their findings. Panyd The muffin is not subtle 11:14, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - does not meet our inclusion criteria and clearly fails content policies. St★lwart 111 01:49, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.