- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. There is consensus that clearly there is suitable coverage, even if it has not yet been included in the current article. Nosebagbear ( talk) 14:47, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Product Hunt
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Product Hunt ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
We should revisit the no consensus outcome of the 2018 AfD. Highly promotional article with heavy involvement of WP:UPE from User:Nivo0o0, USer:Tvlasenko, and others. Citations are all either to the company's own site, coverage of routine business transactions, or of questionable independence. FalconK ( talk) 00:34, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. FalconK ( talk) 00:34, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 01:54, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep obviously notable. ProcrastinatingReader ( talk) 04:07, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep extremely notable. See ProcrastinatingReader's links above. This is the most popular website for launching products.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.33.47.95 ( talk • contribs) 06:33, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — The Earwig talk 03:00, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- keep: Pragmatically. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 14:06, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. There is consensus that clearly there is suitable coverage, even if it has not yet been included in the current article. Nosebagbear ( talk) 14:47, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Product Hunt
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Product Hunt ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
We should revisit the no consensus outcome of the 2018 AfD. Highly promotional article with heavy involvement of WP:UPE from User:Nivo0o0, USer:Tvlasenko, and others. Citations are all either to the company's own site, coverage of routine business transactions, or of questionable independence. FalconK ( talk) 00:34, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. FalconK ( talk) 00:34, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 01:54, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep obviously notable. ProcrastinatingReader ( talk) 04:07, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep extremely notable. See ProcrastinatingReader's links above. This is the most popular website for launching products.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.33.47.95 ( talk • contribs) 06:33, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — The Earwig talk 03:00, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- keep: Pragmatically. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 14:06, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.