- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 07:32, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Per Wickstrom
- Per Wickstrom ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Comes across as a self promotion. Granted there are some reliable sources though on the other hand. (I'm even iffy about putting up this AFD) Wgolf ( talk) 19:36, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: There are quite a few verifiable references. Should the page have additional information, rewritten with a more neutral point of view and add more citations, it could be notable enough to remain. Foxyhues ( talk) 17:34, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 23:20, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 23:20, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 23:20, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — kikichugirl oh hello! 05:52, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — kikichugirl oh hello! 05:52, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete this article, as it clearly tries to establish that a scientologist is a drug rehab specialist, which is promoting the Narconon fraud; if there are reliable independent sources looking at his business (i.e. not the recycled press releases and self-promotion that it currently contains) then fine, but this article is a gross violation of WP:NPOV. Any source discussing Narconon or its practitioners which does not draw attention to the fact that Narconon is a scam, is not a reliable independent source. Guy ( Help!) 15:09, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete the links above provide so far as I can tell only 2 links to a local newspaper, which don't establish notability, and a lot of press releases, none of which are necessarily sufficient to establish notability by our terms. John Carter ( talk) 16:24, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
- delete Local businessman being used as a Narconon WP:COATRACK. Mangoe ( talk) 17:25, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 07:32, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Per Wickstrom
- Per Wickstrom ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Comes across as a self promotion. Granted there are some reliable sources though on the other hand. (I'm even iffy about putting up this AFD) Wgolf ( talk) 19:36, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: There are quite a few verifiable references. Should the page have additional information, rewritten with a more neutral point of view and add more citations, it could be notable enough to remain. Foxyhues ( talk) 17:34, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 23:20, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 23:20, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 23:20, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — kikichugirl oh hello! 05:52, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — kikichugirl oh hello! 05:52, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete this article, as it clearly tries to establish that a scientologist is a drug rehab specialist, which is promoting the Narconon fraud; if there are reliable independent sources looking at his business (i.e. not the recycled press releases and self-promotion that it currently contains) then fine, but this article is a gross violation of WP:NPOV. Any source discussing Narconon or its practitioners which does not draw attention to the fact that Narconon is a scam, is not a reliable independent source. Guy ( Help!) 15:09, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete the links above provide so far as I can tell only 2 links to a local newspaper, which don't establish notability, and a lot of press releases, none of which are necessarily sufficient to establish notability by our terms. John Carter ( talk) 16:24, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
- delete Local businessman being used as a Narconon WP:COATRACK. Mangoe ( talk) 17:25, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.