From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. plicit 01:32, 6 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Parde Mein Rehne Do

Parde Mein Rehne Do (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Future film, fails WP:NFF, should be deleted or moved to draft until release.

PROD removed by creator with no improvements added. DonaldD23 talk to me 14:54, 20 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless ( talk) 04:34, 28 February 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Keep- It meets the wikipedia criteria to remain published. It has strong resources. ( Ak131001 talk) 16:43, 28 February 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per above arguments, there is no point in removing an article if the article has been improved to meet WP standards. Looking at it, it has what you can expect from the article for an unreleased film, and it has sigcov from WP:RS. ( JayPlaysStuff | talk to me | What I've been up to) 11:54, 2 March 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. plicit 01:32, 6 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Parde Mein Rehne Do

Parde Mein Rehne Do (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Future film, fails WP:NFF, should be deleted or moved to draft until release.

PROD removed by creator with no improvements added. DonaldD23 talk to me 14:54, 20 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless ( talk) 04:34, 28 February 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Keep- It meets the wikipedia criteria to remain published. It has strong resources. ( Ak131001 talk) 16:43, 28 February 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per above arguments, there is no point in removing an article if the article has been improved to meet WP standards. Looking at it, it has what you can expect from the article for an unreleased film, and it has sigcov from WP:RS. ( JayPlaysStuff | talk to me | What I've been up to) 11:54, 2 March 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook