The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment: I found one ref:
a review on NPR of a compilation they put out. NPR's definitely something, but that's only one piece of coverage, and it's about one of their products and not the label itself. —
Gwalla |
Talk 04:49, 26 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → Call meHahc21 00:35, 1 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete. I can't find substantial RS coverage to meet GNG, or that it otherwise meets our notability criteria. Some other articles, which likely should be deleted, depend on this article for notability. We can't have an otherwise NN band depend on an otherwise NN record producer for notability.--
Epeefleche (
talk) 03:44, 1 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NorthAmerica1000 01:31, 9 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete, the NPR article, while reliable, doesn't have this label as it's prime topic, only one of its releases. I was able to find some scattered coverage of material that the label has released, but nothing about the label itself, which would lead me to believe they don't meet
WP:CORP.
Lankiveil(
speak to me) 12:56, 17 April 2014 (UTC).reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment: I found one ref:
a review on NPR of a compilation they put out. NPR's definitely something, but that's only one piece of coverage, and it's about one of their products and not the label itself. —
Gwalla |
Talk 04:49, 26 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → Call meHahc21 00:35, 1 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete. I can't find substantial RS coverage to meet GNG, or that it otherwise meets our notability criteria. Some other articles, which likely should be deleted, depend on this article for notability. We can't have an otherwise NN band depend on an otherwise NN record producer for notability.--
Epeefleche (
talk) 03:44, 1 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NorthAmerica1000 01:31, 9 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete, the NPR article, while reliable, doesn't have this label as it's prime topic, only one of its releases. I was able to find some scattered coverage of material that the label has released, but nothing about the label itself, which would lead me to believe they don't meet
WP:CORP.
Lankiveil(
speak to me) 12:56, 17 April 2014 (UTC).reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.