- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. The sentiment here is that, while the article has its problems, AFD is not cleanup. ✗ plicit 03:43, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Mutual fund trust
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mutual fund trust ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article feels very poorly written. Chunks of the article seem to be copied from the sole reference word-for-word. RPI2026F1 ( talk) 03:39, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Canada. RPI2026F1 ( talk) 03:39, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Earwig shows that the article is assembled from chunks of text taken verbatim from half a dozen sources. The amount taken from each source is not large, but hardly any of the article text is original language. Not sure what the appropriate action is on this, but I’m guessing TNT and rewrite from a fresh start. Mccapra ( talk) 05:39, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:14, 22 October 2022 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:46, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep article seems to be copied from several sources per user:Mccapra’s assessment. Article needs work, but deletion is not the answer. Frank Anchor 03:37, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Agreed the article as written is very poor and needs work, however if this reference from a law firm is reliable then approximately a third of all Canadians hold MFTs - which as a 'thing' is notable.[ [1]] ResonantDistortion ( talk) 19:35, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep the article needs to be tidied up Devoke water 18:24, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. The sentiment here is that, while the article has its problems, AFD is not cleanup. ✗ plicit 03:43, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Mutual fund trust
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mutual fund trust ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article feels very poorly written. Chunks of the article seem to be copied from the sole reference word-for-word. RPI2026F1 ( talk) 03:39, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Canada. RPI2026F1 ( talk) 03:39, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Earwig shows that the article is assembled from chunks of text taken verbatim from half a dozen sources. The amount taken from each source is not large, but hardly any of the article text is original language. Not sure what the appropriate action is on this, but I’m guessing TNT and rewrite from a fresh start. Mccapra ( talk) 05:39, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:14, 22 October 2022 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:46, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep article seems to be copied from several sources per user:Mccapra’s assessment. Article needs work, but deletion is not the answer. Frank Anchor 03:37, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Agreed the article as written is very poor and needs work, however if this reference from a law firm is reliable then approximately a third of all Canadians hold MFTs - which as a 'thing' is notable.[ [1]] ResonantDistortion ( talk) 19:35, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep the article needs to be tidied up Devoke water 18:24, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.