- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. § FreeRangeFrog croak 06:12, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Mobogenie
- Mobogenie ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Declined PROD. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. 4 references have been added since the PROD, but most of these have no value at all in terms of establishing notability. Moswento talky 09:22, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:36, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:36, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Fails the notability guidelines on software as it does not have reliable independent sources. The article itself reads more like an advertisement than something suitable for an encyclopedia and a large portion of the first sentence is identical to a sentence on this website. MJ94 ( talk) 01:46, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination Ollieinc ( talk) 07:11, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. All current references apart from the Softpedia entry are clearly labeled as press release or company provided descriptions. Softpedia is a download site and not useful for establishing notability. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric ( talk) 14:04, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, notability not established in the article. I've edited the first sentence, which as MJ94 rightly notes, was a copyvio. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 01:12, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. § FreeRangeFrog croak 06:12, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Mobogenie
- Mobogenie ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Declined PROD. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. 4 references have been added since the PROD, but most of these have no value at all in terms of establishing notability. Moswento talky 09:22, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:36, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:36, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Fails the notability guidelines on software as it does not have reliable independent sources. The article itself reads more like an advertisement than something suitable for an encyclopedia and a large portion of the first sentence is identical to a sentence on this website. MJ94 ( talk) 01:46, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination Ollieinc ( talk) 07:11, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. All current references apart from the Softpedia entry are clearly labeled as press release or company provided descriptions. Softpedia is a download site and not useful for establishing notability. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric ( talk) 14:04, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, notability not established in the article. I've edited the first sentence, which as MJ94 rightly notes, was a copyvio. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 01:12, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.