- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Sulfurboy ( talk) 06:53, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Miller-Keane Encyclopedia & Dictionary of Medicine, Nursing, and Allied Health
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Miller-Keane Encyclopedia & Dictionary of Medicine, Nursing, and Allied Health ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nothing indicates WP:NBOOK notability. Gotitbro ( talk) 06:52, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Gotitbro ( talk) 06:52, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Gotitbro ( talk) 06:52, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Gotitbro ( talk) 06:52, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Looking at /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Notability_(books)#cite_note-textbooks-7 ,this Encyclopedia does not appear to be notable as a book, especially due to the fact that it isn't sufficiently important/groundbreaking to the medical field. Also, especially with the previous rule for determining the notability of books, it specifically excludes reference books, which this is- therefore even if some educational institutions use it as a resource, it should still be deleted. Stickymatch 16:08, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. This article meets WP:NBOOK, specifically WP:BOOKCRIT #1. I have updated the article to include book reviews from five different medical journals. MarkZusab ( talk) 14:07, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. seems an important and serious book, used as a ref in anatomical articles. Walidou47 ( talk) 17:11, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep on the basis of the sources added by MarkZusab. Mccapra ( talk) 00:54, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - All the sources are reliable. 🌺Kori🌺 - ( @) 05:07, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Sulfurboy ( talk) 06:53, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Miller-Keane Encyclopedia & Dictionary of Medicine, Nursing, and Allied Health
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Miller-Keane Encyclopedia & Dictionary of Medicine, Nursing, and Allied Health ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nothing indicates WP:NBOOK notability. Gotitbro ( talk) 06:52, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Gotitbro ( talk) 06:52, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Gotitbro ( talk) 06:52, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Gotitbro ( talk) 06:52, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Looking at /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Notability_(books)#cite_note-textbooks-7 ,this Encyclopedia does not appear to be notable as a book, especially due to the fact that it isn't sufficiently important/groundbreaking to the medical field. Also, especially with the previous rule for determining the notability of books, it specifically excludes reference books, which this is- therefore even if some educational institutions use it as a resource, it should still be deleted. Stickymatch 16:08, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. This article meets WP:NBOOK, specifically WP:BOOKCRIT #1. I have updated the article to include book reviews from five different medical journals. MarkZusab ( talk) 14:07, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. seems an important and serious book, used as a ref in anatomical articles. Walidou47 ( talk) 17:11, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep on the basis of the sources added by MarkZusab. Mccapra ( talk) 00:54, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - All the sources are reliable. 🌺Kori🌺 - ( @) 05:07, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.