From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Lakes of Grand Teton National Park. There were a few suggestions to merge to the target article. Any editor is welcome to check over the revision history if they feel that there is some abandoned material that needs to be incorporated into the target. Joyous! Noise! 19:54, 16 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Mica Lake

Mica Lake (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GEONATURAL which requires that ""information beyond statistics and coordinates is known to exist". BEFORE searched returned only passing mentions in hiking logs and various lists of natural features, none of which provide any information about the lake beyond its location and basic characteristics. – dlthewave 18:33, 9 July 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Redirect/Merge to Lakes of Grand Teton National Park: the lake does not pass any notability guideline so it does not deserve its own article. InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs) 10:02, 10 July 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to Lakes of Grand Teton National Park. There is simply not enough information to make an encyclopaedic article about this lake. The nom.'s case is correct, and GEOLAND says The number of known sources should be considered to ensure there is enough verifiable content for an encyclopedic article. If a Wikipedia article cannot be developed using known sources, information on the feature can instead be included in a more general article on local geography. The more general article exists and the lake is included in the redirect target. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 22:30, 10 July 2023 (UTC) reply
    Redirect per above. Okoslavia ( talk) 03:26, 11 July 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect per above to Lakes of Grand Teton National Park. This is one of a series of small Teton lake AfDs that share the same issues. Others have already been closed as redirects.
-- A. B. ( talkcontribsglobal count) 11:30, 14 July 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Lakes of Grand Teton National Park. There were a few suggestions to merge to the target article. Any editor is welcome to check over the revision history if they feel that there is some abandoned material that needs to be incorporated into the target. Joyous! Noise! 19:54, 16 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Mica Lake

Mica Lake (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GEONATURAL which requires that ""information beyond statistics and coordinates is known to exist". BEFORE searched returned only passing mentions in hiking logs and various lists of natural features, none of which provide any information about the lake beyond its location and basic characteristics. – dlthewave 18:33, 9 July 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Redirect/Merge to Lakes of Grand Teton National Park: the lake does not pass any notability guideline so it does not deserve its own article. InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs) 10:02, 10 July 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to Lakes of Grand Teton National Park. There is simply not enough information to make an encyclopaedic article about this lake. The nom.'s case is correct, and GEOLAND says The number of known sources should be considered to ensure there is enough verifiable content for an encyclopedic article. If a Wikipedia article cannot be developed using known sources, information on the feature can instead be included in a more general article on local geography. The more general article exists and the lake is included in the redirect target. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 22:30, 10 July 2023 (UTC) reply
    Redirect per above. Okoslavia ( talk) 03:26, 11 July 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect per above to Lakes of Grand Teton National Park. This is one of a series of small Teton lake AfDs that share the same issues. Others have already been closed as redirects.
-- A. B. ( talkcontribsglobal count) 11:30, 14 July 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook