The result of the debate was no consensus to delete, so kept. Johnleemk | Talk 12:03, 28 November 2005 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. why wasn't this closed long ago? (non-admin closure) L293D ( ☎ • ✎) 23:55, 18 May 2018 (UTC) reply
Okay, I originally flagged this as a cleanup-verify about two weeks ago, but seeing as there's been no further verification (and since I can't verify it with Google myself), I'm moving it here because it sounds pretty much like a hoax. So, Delete per nom. -
LichYoshi 01:51, 22 November 2005 (UTC) See my vote below. -03:47, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was no consensus to delete, so kept. Johnleemk | Talk 12:03, 28 November 2005 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. why wasn't this closed long ago? (non-admin closure) L293D ( ☎ • ✎) 23:55, 18 May 2018 (UTC) reply
Okay, I originally flagged this as a cleanup-verify about two weeks ago, but seeing as there's been no further verification (and since I can't verify it with Google myself), I'm moving it here because it sounds pretty much like a hoax. So, Delete per nom. -
LichYoshi 01:51, 22 November 2005 (UTC) See my vote below. -03:47, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
reply